164 research outputs found
The Disruptive User - Internet Appliances and the Management of Complexity
Bringing networked computing to new users and new contexts entails a disruptive decrease in the level of user patience for
complexity. This paper discusses the tensions involved in making devices as easy to use as traditional appliances, within the
context of the open and rapidly changing Internet. It distinguishes class 1 appliances, whose function is fixed by the manufacturer,
from class 2 appliance, whose functionality is determined by an associated service provider, and posits a third class
of appliance that would achieve true ease of use by leaving control with the user while simultaneously automating much of
the complexity associated with that control
A Taxonomy of Internet Appliances
The world is evolving from one in which almost all access to the Internet comes from personal
computers (PCs) to one in which so-called Internet appliances (IAs) will make up a greater share
of end-user equipment. Today's PC is a general-purpose, highly configurable and extensible
device ? an "intelligent end-node" of the sort the Internet's designers had in mind. As such, it
allows users much freedom of choice (such as which service provider to use, which Web sites to
visit, and which new software to download) in exchange for dealing with associated complexity.
An IA is a device connected to the Internet, but beyond that there is little consensus on
functionality and target markets. There is, however, general agreement that it reduces the level
of complexity seen by the user. A variety of approaches to reducing complexity are being
pursued. These fall on a spectrum from totally fixing the function of devices, to automating the
configuration of more general purpose systems. In the middle are devices whose functions
appear more or less fixed to the user, but which retain some limited capability for upgrade
through their Internet connection
Measuring Broadband’s Economic Impact
Does broadband matter to the economy? Numerous studies have focused on whether there is a digital divide, on regulatory impacts and investment incentives, and on the factors influencing where broadband is available. However, given how recently broadband has been adopted, little empirical research has investigated its economic impact. This paper presents estimates of the effect of broadband on a number of indicators of economic activity, including employment, wages, and industry mix, using a cross-sectional panel data set of communities (by zip code) across the United States. We match data from the FCC (Form 477) on broadband availability with demographic and other economic data from the US Population Censuses and Establishment Surveys. We find support for the conclusion that broadband positively affects economic activity in ways that are consistent with the qualitative stories told by broadband advocates. Even after controlling for community-level factors known to influence broadband availability and economic activity, we find that between 1998 and 2002, communities in which mass-market broadband was available by December 1999 experienced more rapid growth in (1) employment, (2) the number of businesses overall, and (3) businesses in IT-intensive sectors. In addition, the effect of broadband availability by 1999 can be observed in higher market rates for rental housing in 2000. We compare state-level with zip-code level analyses to highlight data aggregation problems, and discuss a number of analytic and data issues that bear on further measurements of broadband’s economic impact. This analysis is perforce preliminary because additional data and experience are needed to more accurately address this important question; however, the early results presented here suggest that the assumed (and oft-touted) economic impacts of broadband are both real and measurable
Post-pandemic recovery: use of scientific advice to achieve social equity, planetary health, and economic benefits.
Every step you take, we’ll be watching you: nudging and the ramifications of GPS technology
The Total System Design (TSD) Framework: An Approach to the Development of Distributed Systems Design Methodologies
A methodological framework is an abstraction over a class of design methodologies. The framework characteristics the problem solving approach shared by the methodologies belonging to that class: it identifies the nature of their common design concerns and the fundamental logical interdependencies between these concerns. The paper proposes a particular framework called the Total System Design (TSD) Framework. It represents a specification for a class of design methodologies which view computer-based systems as potentially distributed hardware/software aggregates. As such, the TSD Framework consolidates under a unified perspective two traditionally separate concerns: software design and hardware design. Furthermore, it establishes the role played by hardware/software trade-offs in system design. A strategy for deriving methodologies from the TSD Framework is outlined and illustrated
An Integrated Approach to Understand Relationships Between Shallow Water Benthic Community Structure and Ecosystem Function SERDP Project SI-1335
Human activities along our nation\u27s coasts often lead to habitat modification, pollution, and overexploitation of living resources in coastal and estuarine waters (U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 2004). Coastal areas are the most developed regions of the United States. In addition to recreational and leisure activities, these areas support commercial fishing, aquaculture, shipping, and defense activities. Numerous human activities can have detrimental effects on biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services that support and sustain human populations. Given their proximity to the land and human population centers, nearshore estuarine ecosystems are especially vulnerable. Effective management can be improved with a better understanding of relationships between ecological integrity and human pressures in these ecosystems (National Estuary Program 2007). Ecologists, coastal managers, and policy-makers are working together to develop better ways to measure and manage human effects on estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Management strategies can be framed in the context of human actions (pressure or stressor), resulting effects on community structure and ecosystem functions (state or condition), and management response
An Automated Technique for the Measurement of Limb Occlusion Pressure During Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Is Equivalent to Previous Gold Standard
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of an automated pneumatic torniquet pump and its ability to automatically calculate the limb occlusion pressure (LOP), as compared with the manual Doppler ultrasound technique.
METHODS: Participants presenting to a Sports Medicine clinic were evaluated for study enrollment. Participants were fitted with a pneumatic tourniquet for the upper and lower extremity. LOP measurements were taken with a Doppler ultrasound or automated SmartCuffs PRO device in a randomized order.
RESULTS: Final analysis was performed on 96 limbs (48 upper extremities and 48 lower extremities). The study population had a mean age 37.1 ± 14.7 years old and a mean body mass index of 25.47 ± 3.80. The mean measured LOP pressure on the upper extremity with Doppler ultrasound was 174.0 ± 48.7 mm Hg with a range from 120 to 282 mm Hg, whereas the mean measured LOP by the automated pump was 184.0 ± 44.9 mm Hg with a range from 135 to 266 mm Hg. There was no statistically significant difference found between the Doppler LOP and the Smart Cuff upper extremity LOP (P = .29). When evaluating LOP pressure on the lower extremity the mean LOP found with the Doppler ultrasound was 195.0 ± 31.9 mm Hg with a range from 160 to 272 mm Hg, whereas the automated pump the mean LOP was 205.0 ± 27.1 mm Hg with a range from 168 to 278 mm Hg. There was no statistically significant difference found between the Doppler LOP and the automated pump lower extremity LOP (P = .09).
CONCLUSIONS: No difference in the personalized LOP measurement was found when comparing an automated pump with the current gold standard of manual Doppler ultrasound. No patients companied of pain or discomfort during the LOP measurement.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic: prospective cohort study
- …