16 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Environmentally-acquired bacteria influence microbial diversity and natural innate immune responses at gut surfaces
Background: Early microbial colonization of the gut reduces the incidence of infectious, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Recent population studies reveal that childhood hygiene is a significant risk factor for development of inflammatory bowel disease, thereby reinforcing the hygiene hypothesis and the potential importance of microbial colonization during early life. The extent to which early-life environment impacts on microbial diversity of the adult gut and subsequent immune processes has not been comprehensively investigated thus far. We addressed this important question using the pig as a model to evaluate the impact of early-life environment on microbe/host gut interactions during development. Results: Genetically-related piglets were housed in either indoor or outdoor environments or in experimental isolators. Analysis of over 3,000 16S rRNA sequences revealed major differences in mucosa-adherent microbial diversity in the ileum of adult pigs attributable to differences in early-life environment. Pigs housed in a natural outdoor environment showed a dominance of Firmicutes, in particular Lactobacillus, whereas animals housed in a hygienic indoor environment had reduced Lactobacillus and higher numbers of potentially pathogenic phylotypes. Our analysis revealed a strong negative correlation between the abundance of Firmicutes and pathogenic bacterial populations in the gut. These differences were exaggerated in animals housed in experimental isolators. Affymetrix microarray technology and Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction revealed significant gut-specific gene responses also related to early-life environment. Significantly, indoor-housed pigs displayed increased expression of Type 1 interferon genes, Major Histocompatibility Complex class I and several chemokines. Gene Ontology and pathway analysis further confirmed these results. Conclusion: Early-life environment significantly affects both microbial composition of the adult gut and mucosal innate immune function. We observed that a microbiota dominated by lactobacilli may function to maintain mucosal immune homeostasis and limit pathogen colonization
Recommended from our members
Restricting Microbial Exposure in Early Life Negates the Immune Benefits Associated with Gut Colonization in Environments of High Microbial Diversity
Background: Acquisition of the intestinal microbiota in early life corresponds with the development of the mucosal immune system. Recent work on caesarean-delivered infants revealed that early microbial composition is influenced by birthing method and environment. Furthermore, we have confirmed that early-life environment strongly influences both the adult gut microbiota and development of the gut immune system. Here, we address the impact of limiting microbial exposure after initial colonization on the development of adult gut immunity.
Methodology/Principal Findings: Piglets were born in indoor or outdoor rearing units, allowing natural colonization in the
immediate period after birth, prior to transfer to high-health status isolators. Strikingly, gut closure and morphological
development were strongly affected by isolator-rearing, independent of indoor or outdoor origins of piglets. Isolator-reared
animals showed extensive vacuolation and disorganization of the gut epithelium, inferring that normal gut closure requires
maturation factors present in maternal milk. Although morphological maturation and gut closure were delayed in isolatorreared
animals, these hard-wired events occurred later in development. Type I IFN, IL-22, IL-23 and Th17 pathways were
increased in indoor-isolator compared to outdoor-isolator animals during early life, indicating greater immune activation in
pigs originating from indoor environments reflecting differences in the early microbiota. This difference was less apparent
later in development due to enhanced immune activation and convergence of the microbiota in all isolator-reared animals.
This correlated with elevation of Type I IFN pathways in both groups, although T cell pathways were still more affected in
indoor-reared animals.
Conclusions/Significance: Environmental factors, in particular microbial exposure, influence expression of a large number
of immune-related genes. However, the homeostatic effects of microbial colonization in outdoor environments require
sustained microbial exposure throughout development. Gut development in high-hygiene environments negatively
impacts on normal succession of the gut microbiota and promotes innate immune activation which may impair immune
homeostasis
Recommended from our members
Establishment of Normal Gut Microbiota Is Compromised under Excessive Hygiene Conditions
Background: Early gut colonization events are purported to have a major impact on the incidence of infectious,
inflammatory and autoimmune diseases in later life. Hence, factors which influence this process may have important
implications for both human and animal health. Previously, we demonstrated strong influences of early-life environment on
gut microbiota composition in adult pigs. Here, we sought to further investigate the impact of limiting microbial exposure
during early life on the development of the pig gut microbiota.
Methodology/Principal Findings: Outdoor- and indoor-reared animals, exposed to the microbiota in their natural rearing
environment for the first two days of life, were transferred to an isolator facility and adult gut microbial diversity was
analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. From a total of 2,196 high-quality 16S rRNA gene sequences, 440 phylotypes were
identified in the outdoor group and 431 phylotypes in the indoor group. The majority of clones were assigned to the four
phyla Firmicutes (67.5% of all sequences), Proteobacteria (17.7%), Bacteroidetes (13.5%) and to a lesser extent,
Actinobacteria (0.1%). Although the initial maternal and environmental microbial inoculum of isolator-reared animals was
identical to that of their naturally-reared littermates, the microbial succession and stabilization events reported previously in
naturally-reared outdoor animals did not occur. In contrast, the gut microbiota of isolator-reared animals remained highly
diverse containing a large number of distinct phylotypes.
Conclusions/Significance: The results documented here indicate that establishment and development of the normal gut
microbiota requires continuous microbial exposure during the early stages of life and this process is compromised under
conditions of excessive hygiene
Estimation of the incidence of animal rabies in Punjab, India.
BACKGROUND:Rabies is a devastating zoonotic disease of mammals that causes encephalitis and death. It is endemic in India, with an estimated annual 20,000 human deaths (one-third of the global rabies burden). The magnitude of animal rabies incidence is unknown. METHODS:In four sub-districts of Punjab, India, we monitored canine and livestock populations from August 15, 2016 to August 14, 2017. Demographic, clinical and rabies diagnostic laboratory (RDL) data were collected from suspected cases of rabies. The annual incidence rate / 10,000 animal years at risk (95% CI) in each sub-district was estimated for each species. RESULTS:During 2016-2017, a total of 41 suspected rabies cases were detected in the four selected sub-districts in Punjab. Laboratory confirmed rabies (LCR) incidence was 2.03/10,000 dog years (0.69, 5.96) and 2.71/10,000 dog years (1.14, 6.43) in stray and pet dogs, respectively. The LCR incidence in farmed buffalo and cattle was 0.19/10,000 buffalo years (0.07, 0.57) and 0.23/10,000 cattle years (0.06, 0.88), respectively. The LCR incidence amongst equine was 4.28/10,000 equine years (0.48, 38.10). Stray cattle rabies incidence in the selected sub-districts was 9.49/10,000 cattle years (3.51, 25.67). If similar enhanced surveillance for rabies was conducted state-wide, we estimate that 98 (34-294) buffalo, 18 (2-156) equine, 56 (15-214) farmed cattle, 96 (35-259) stray cattle, 128 (54-303) pet dogs and 62 (21-182) stray dogs would be expected to be confirmed with rabies in Punjab annually. CONCLUSION:These results indicate that rabies incidence in animals, particularly in dogs and stray cattle, is much higher than previously suspected. We recommend that statewide enhanced disease surveillance should be conducted to obtain more accurate estimates of rabies incidence in Punjab to facilitate better control of this important disease
Table_1_Development of Immune Cells in the Intestinal Mucosa Can Be Affected by Intensive and Extensive Farm Environments, and Antibiotic Use.DOCX
<p>Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that exposure to farm environments during childhood can be linked to reductions in the incidence of immune disorders, but generating an appropriate model is difficult. 108 half-sibling piglets were born on either extensive (outdoor) or intensive (indoor) farms: at 1βday old, a subset of piglets from each litter were transferred to a high-hygiene isolator facility to create differences in rearing environment either during birth/first day or during the subsequent 56βdays of life. Interactions between CD14, CD16, MHCIIDR, and capillary endothelium were assessed using four-color quantitative fluorescence immunohistology. Effects of birth and rearing environment on the antigen-presenting microenvironment of the proximal and distal jejunum (professional and stromal) were apparent at 5, 28, and 56βdays after birth However, effects on CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>+</sup>Foxp3<sup>+</sup> regulatory T-cells (T<sub>regs</sub>) in the intestinal mucosa were apparent around weaning at 28βdays but had disappeared by 56βdays. These T<sub>regs</sub> were reduced in the isolator piglets compared to their farm-reared siblings, but this effect was less marked in piglets born on the extensive farm and required administration of antibiotics. Our results suggest that there may be at least two windows of opportunity in which different farm environments were influencing immune development: one during the perinatal period (up to the first day of life), and one during later infancy. Furthermore, the differences on T<sub>regs</sub> suggest that the effects of early life influences may be particularly critical around weaning.</p