20 research outputs found

    Patients' and Observers' Perceptions of Involvement Differ. Validation Study on Inter-Relating Measures for Shared Decision Making

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: Patient involvement into medical decisions as conceived in the shared decision making method (SDM) is essential in evidence based medicine. However, it is not conclusively evident how best to define, realize and evaluate involvement to enable patients making informed choices. We aimed at investigating the ability of four measures to indicate patient involvement. While use and reporting of these instruments might imply wide overlap regarding the addressed constructs this assumption seems questionable with respect to the diversity of the perspectives from which the assessments are administered. METHODS: The study investigated a nested cohort (N = 79) of a randomized trial evaluating a patient decision aid on immunotherapy for multiple sclerosis. Convergent validities were calculated between observer ratings of videotaped physician-patient consultations (OPTION) and patients' perceptions of the communication (Shared Decision Making Questionnaire, Control Preference Scale & Decisional Conflict Scale). RESULTS: OPTION reliability was high to excellent. Communication performance was low according to OPTION and high according to the three patient administered measures. No correlations were found between observer and patient judges, neither for means nor for single items. Patient report measures showed some moderate correlations. CONCLUSION: Existing SDM measures do not refer to a single construct. A gold standard is missing to decide whether any of these measures has the potential to indicate patient involvement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pronounced heterogeneity of the underpinning constructs implies difficulties regarding the interpretation of existing evidence on the efficacy of SDM. Consideration of communication theory and basic definitions of SDM would recommend an inter-subjective focus of measurement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN25267500

    How do family physicians communicate about cardiovascular risk? Frequencies and determinants of different communication formats

    Get PDF
    Background: Patients understand information about risk better if it is communicated in numerical or visual formats (e.g. graphs) compared to verbal qualifiers only. How frequently different communication formats are used in clinical primary care settings is unknown. Methods: We collected socioeconomic and patient understanding data using questionnaires and audio-recorded consultations about cardiovascular disease risk. The frequencies of the communication formats were calculated and multivariate regression analysis of associations between communication formats, patient and general practitioner characteristics, and patient subjective understanding was performed. Results: In 73% of 70 consultations, verbal qualifiers were used exclusively to communicate cardiovascular risk, compared to numerical (11%) and visual (16%) formats. Female GPs and female patient's gender were significantly associated with a higher use of verbal formats compared to visual formats (p = 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively). Patient subjective understanding was significantly higher in visual counseling compared to verbal counseling (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Verbal qualifiers are the most often used communication format, though recommendations favor numerical and visual formats, with visual formats resulting in better understanding than others. Also, gender is associated with the choice of communication format. Barriers against numerical and visual communication formats among GPs and patients should be studied, including gender aspects. Adequate risk communication should be integrated into physicians' education

    The State Socialist Mortality Syndrome

    Get PDF
    Death rates for working-age men in European state socialist countries deviated from general improvements in survival observed in the rest of Europe during the 20th century. The magnitude of structural labor force changes across countries correlates with lagged increases in death rates for men in the working ages. This pattern is consistent with a hypothesis that hyper-development of heavy industry and stagnation (even contraction) of the service sector created anomic conditions leading to unhealthy lifestyles and self-destructive behavior among men moving from primary-sector to secondary-sector occupations. Occupational contrasts within countries similarly show concentration of rising male death rates among blue collar workers. Collapse of state socialist systems produced rapid corrections in labor force structure after 1990, again correlated with a fading of the state socialist mortality syndrome in following decades

    Cohort profile: the German Diabetes Study (GDS)

    Full text link

    Kompetenzzentrum fĆ¼r Lehrevaluation an den Medizinischen FakultƤten in Baden-WĆ¼rttemberg

    No full text
    In the following article the work of the Centre for Competence for teaching evaluation within the medical faculties in Baden-WĆ¼rttemberg will be presented. First of all the background for the establishment of the Centre for Competence will be explained. At the same time reference will be made to the embedding of the evaluation in a quality protection circuit. Using the Medical Faculty of the University of Freiburg as an example, the construction of an evaluation system will be explained. Subsequently, the tasks of the Centre for Competence for teaching evaluation will be outlined. The final section addresses the issue of overall faculty teaching evaluation of students in Baden-WĆ¼rttemberg.Im folgenden Beitrag wird die Arbeit des Kompetenzzentrums fĆ¼r Lehrevaluation an den Medizinischen FakultƤten in Baden-WĆ¼rttemberg dargestellt. Einleitend wird der Hintergrund fĆ¼r die Einrichtung des Kompetenzzentrums erlƤutert. Dabei wird auf die Einbettung der Evaluation in einen QualitƤtssicherungskreislauf verwiesen. Am Beispiel der Medizinischen FakultƤt Freiburg wird der Aufbau eines Evaluationssystems erklƤrt. Anschliessend werden die Aufgaben des Kompetenzzentrums fĆ¼r Lehrevaluation erlƤutert. Der letzte Abschnitt geht auf die fakultƤtsĆ¼bergreifende studentische Lehrevaluation in Baden-WĆ¼rttemberg ein

    Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Partizipativen Entscheidungsfindung

    No full text
    corecore