Evaluation of platelet function in essential thrombocythemia under different analytical conditions

Background. Studies of platelet aggregation (PA) in essential thrombocythemia (ET) reported contrasting results, likely due to differences in analytical conditions. Objective. We investigated platelet aggregation using different techniques and analytical conditions. Patients and Methods. PA was studied by light-transmission aggregometry (LTA) in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and impedance aggregometry in PRP and whole blood (WB). ADP, collagen, thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP-14) and adrenaline were used as agonists. Since ET patients (n = 41) were on treatment with aspirin (100 mg/d), healthy controls (n = 29) were given aspirin (100 mg/d) for 5 days before testing: therefore, thromboxane A2-independent PA was tested in all subjects. Blood samples were collected in citrate (C) [low Ca2+] or lepirudin (L) [physiological Ca2+]; platelet count was adjusted to 250 x 109/L in a set of C-PRP (adjusted C-PRP) and left unmodified in the other samples. Results. Results of PA in 17 ET patients who were poor responders to aspirin (high serum thromboxane B2 levels) were not included in the analysis. With LTA, PA in ET was lower than in controls in adjusted C-PRP and normal in native C-PRP and L-PRP. With impedance aggregometry, PA in L-PRP and L-WB tended to be higher in ET than in controls. Platelet serotonin and ADP contents were reduced in ET. The percentages of circulating platelets expressing P-selectin and platelet-leukocyte hetero-aggregates were higher in ET. Conclusions. Analytical conditions dramatically affect in vitro PA of ET patients, which appears defective under the least physiological conditions and normal/supranormal under conditions that are closer to the physiological

Recurrent thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: incidence, risk factors, and effect of treatments

BACKGROUND: Prior thrombosis is a well-established risk factor for re-thrombosis in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia but scarce data are available on the rate of re-thrombosis and the optimal strategy for prevention of recurrence. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively estimated the rate of recurrence in a multicenter cohort of 494 patients (poly-cythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia 235/259) with previous arterial (67.6%) or venous thrombosis (31%) or both (1.4%). First thrombosis was cerebrovascular disease in 191 cases, acute coronary syndrome in 106, peripheral arterial thrombosis in 44, and venous thromboembolism in 160. Microcirculatory events were not computed. RESULTS: Thrombosis recurred in 166 patients (33.6%), with an incidence of 7.6% patient-years. Sex, diagnosis (polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia), and presence of vascular risk factors did not predict recurrence, whereas age >60 years did (multivariable hazard ratio [HR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.32). Increased leukocyte count at the time of the first thrombosis was a risk factor for recurrence in patients <60 years old (HR 3.55; 95% CI 1.02-12.25). Cytoreduction halved the risk in the overall cohort (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.38-0.73) and the combination with antiplatelet agents or oral anticoagulants was more effective than administration of single drugs. Significant prevention of rethrombosis was independently achieved in patients with venous thromboembolism by both oral anticoagulants (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15-0.64) and antiplatelet agents (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.77), in those with acute coronary syndrome by cytoreduction (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.13-0.68), and in those with cerebrovascular disease by antiplatelet agents (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.66). The overall incidence of major bleeding was 0.9% patient-years and rose to 2.8% in patients receiving both antiplatelet and anti-vitamin K agents. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, cytoreduction protects against recurrent thrombosis, particularly after acute coronary syndrome. The contemporary use of oral anticoagulants (after venous thromboembolism) or antiplatelet agents (after cerebrovascular disease or venous thromboembolism) further improves the protective effect. Such findings call for prospective studies aimed at investigating whether strategies tailored according to the type of first thrombosis could improve prevention of recurrences