Sensitivity of Second-Generation Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection of Hepatitis C Virus Infection among Oncology Patients

Background: The second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA 2), an antibody-detection test, has high sensitivity and is one of the recommended screening tests for detecting HCV infection in the United States. However, its sensitivity among oncology patients is unknown. Objective: Assess the EIA 2 sensitivity among a group of oncology patients at a Nebraska clinic where an HCV outbreak occurred during 2000–2001 using nucleic acid testing (NAT) and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) as the gold standards. Study design: Serum specimens were collected from patients 16 months after transmission had stopped. We tested the specimens using EIA 2 (Abbott HCV EIA 2.0), a NAT assay based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) (Gen-Probe TMA assay) and RIBA (Chiron RIBA® HCV 3.0 SIA). HCV infection was defined as a positive RIBA or TMA test in an oncology patient. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were determined in EIA 2-negative/TMA-positive samples. Results: A total of 264 samples were included in the study.We identified 92 HCV infections, 76 of which were Abbott EIA 2 positive. Abbott EIA 2 sensitivity was 83% (76/92), lower than that reported among healthy adults (90%) (p = 0.01) and poor sensitivity was associated with receipt of chemotherapy during the outbreak period (p = 0.02). Only 1 (6%) of the 16 EIA 2-negative cases had elevated ALT. Conclusions: In this study, EIA 2 sensitivity among oncology patients was lower than that previously reported among immunocompetent persons. Impaired antibody production related to cancer and/or chemotherapy might explain the reduced sensitivity. These findings indicate that, when assessing HCV status in oncology patients, a NAT test should be routinely considered in addition to EIA

West Nile virus blood transfusion-related infection despite nucleic acid testing

BACKGROUND: A case of West Nile virus (WNV) encephalitis associated with transfusion of blood that did not react when tested for WNV by minipool (MP) nucleic acid testing (NAT) is described. A Nebraska man developed clinical encephalitis 13 days after surgery and transfusion of 26 blood components. Antibody testing confirmed WNV infection. An investigation was initiated to determine the source of this infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The patient’s family members were interviewed to identify risk factors for WNV infection. Residual samples were retested for WNV RNA using transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay and two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Blood donors’ follow-up serum samples were collected. All samples were tested for WNV-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies. RESULTS: The patient’s family denied recent mosquito exposure. The 20 blood components collected after July 2003 did not react when tested for WNV in a six-member MP-NAT at the time of donation. Retrospective individual testing identified one sample as WNV-reactive by the TMA assay and one of the PCR assays. Seroconversion was demonstrated in the donor associated with this sample. CONCLUSION: WNV RNA detection by individual donation NAT demonstrates viremic blood escaping MPNAT and supports transfusion-related WNV transmission. MP-NAT may not detect all WNV-infected blood donors, allowing WNV transmission to continue at low levels. WNV NAT assays might vary in sensitivity and pooling donations could further impact test performance. Understanding MP NAT limitations can improve strategies to maintain safety of the blood supply in the United States

Significant Closure of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Hepatitis C Virus Preseroconversion Detection Windows with a Transcription-Mediated-Amplification-Driven Assay

While the present generation of serology-based assays has significantly decreased the number of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections acquired by transfusion, the possibility of infected donations escaping detection still exists. The average seronegative viremic window duration during which immunological assays are unable to detect the virus is estimated to be between 16 and 22 days for HIV-1 and approximately 70 days for HCV. Significant reduction of detection window duration was demonstrated using a nucleic acid amplification assay, the Procleix HIV-1/HCV Assay, which utilizes transcription-mediated amplification technology to simultaneously detect HIV-1 and HCV RNAs. For 26 commercially available HIV-1 seroconversion panels tested, specimens were reactive in the HIV-1/HCV assay at the same time as or earlier than in serological assays. Overall, the HIV-1/HCV assay was able to reduce the detection window duration by an average of 14 days and 6 days compared to tests relying on recognition of HIV-1 antibody and p24 antigen, respectively. For 24 commercially available HCV seroconversion panels tested, the specimens were reactive in the HIV-1/HCV assay at an earlier blood sampling date than in serological assays, reducing the detection window duration by an average of 26 days. Similar results were obtained in testing the HIV-1 and HCV seroconversion panels in the virus-specific HIV-1- and HCV-discriminatory assays, respectively. In conclusion, the HIV-1/HCV assay and corresponding discriminatory assays significantly reduced detection window durations compared to immunoassays

Absence of HBV and HCV, HTLV-I and -II, and human herpes virus-8 activation after allogeneic RBC transfusion in patients with advanced HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND:The Viral Activation Transfusion Study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of transfusion with WBC-reduced versus non-WBC-reduced RBCs to HIV+ patients. The primary study characterized the effect of transfusion on HIV and CMV activation by monitoring viral load changes. The present study analyzed HBV, HCV, HTLV-I and -II, and human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8) viral load before and after transfusion to evaluate the further hypothesis that global immune stimulation following allogeneic RBC transfusion results in activation and increased viral proliferation of chronic viral infections other than HIV and CMV. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:Baseline samples from 519 to 523 subjects were screened for HBV, HCV, HTLV-I and -II, and HHV-8 infection, and baseline, serial weekly, and quarterly blood samples from infected subjects in the non-WBC-reduced arm were evaluated for changes from baseline in viral nucleic acid and ALT levels. RESULTS:Seroprevalence of HBV, HCV, HTLV-I and -II, and HHV-8 was 68, 25, 5, and 30 percent, respectively. No significant induction of HBV, HCV, HHV-8, or HTLV-I and -II viral replication following allogeneic transfusion of non-WBC-reduced blood was observed. A significant, albeit small, association was observed between transfusion and ALT. CONCLUSIONS:Based on these results and our previous finding that no adverse effect on HIV and CMV viral load and disease progression results from allogeneic transfusion, no evidence is found to support the selective use of WBC-reduced blood components for HIV-infected patients