Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety of Kielland's rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) in comparison with other modes of delivery for the management of persistent fetal malposition in the second stage of labour. Objectives To derive estimates of risks of maternal and neonatal complications following KRFD, compared with rotational ventouse delivery (RVD), non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD) or a second-stage caesarean section (CS), from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Search Strategy Standard search methodology, as recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Selection Criteria Case series, prospective or retrospective cohort studies and population-based studies. Data Collection and Analysis A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to derive weighted pooled estimates of maternal and neonatal complications. Main Results Thirteen studies were included. For postpartum haemorrhage there was no significant difference between Kielland's and ventouse delivery; the rate was lower in Kielland's delivery compared with non-rotational forceps (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.95) and second-stage CS (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36–0.58). There were no differences in the rates of anal sphincter injuries or admission to neonatal intensive care. Rates of shoulder dystocia were higher with Kielland's delivery compared with ventouse delivery (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.08–2.98), but rates of neonatal birth trauma were lower (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.91). There were no differences seen in the rates of 5-min APGAR score < 7 between Kielland's delivery and other instrumental births, but they were lower when compared with second-stage CS (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.97). Conclusions Kielland's rotational forceps delivery is a safe option for the management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labour

Incidence of vasa praevia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives To derive accurate estimates of the incidence of vasa praevia (VP) in a routine population of unselected pregnancies. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database was performed to review relevant citations reporting outcomes in pregnancies with VP from January 2000 until 5 April 2023. Eligibility criteria for selection of studies Prospective or retrospective cohort or population studies that provided data regarding VP cases in routine unselected pregnancies during the study period. We included studies published in the English language after the year 2000 to reflect contemporary obstetric and neonatal practice. Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved citations and extracted data. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to ensure standardised reporting of studies. Results A total of 3847 citations were screened and 82 full-text manuscripts were retrieved for analysis. There were 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria, of which 12 studies reported prenatal diagnosis with a systematic protocol of screening. There were 1320 pregnancies with VP in a total population of 2 278 561 pregnancies; the weighted pooled incidence of VP was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.01) per 1000 pregnancies, corresponding to 1 case of VP per 1271 (95% CI: 990 to 1692) pregnancies. Nested subanalysis of studies reporting screening for VP based on a specific protocol identified 395 pregnancies with VP in a population of 732 654 pregnancies with weighted pooled incidence of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.53 to 1.18) per 1000 pregnancies (1 case of VP per 1218 (95% CI: 847 to 1901) pregnancies). Conclusion The incidence of VP in unselected pregnancies is 1 in 1218 pregnancies. This is higher than is previously reported and can be used as a basis to assess whether screening for this condition should be part of routine clinical practice. Incorporation of strategies to screen for VP in routine clinical practice is likely to prevent 5% of stillbirths

Case number 6 : narcolepsy and cataplexy

A 35-year-old woman from Serbia presented to the neurology department with a 20 year history of excessive daytime sleepiness and recurrent episodes of dropping to the floor whilst still retaining consciousness. These episodes were brought on by laughing or strong emotions.peer-reviewe

Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps

We compared complications in pregnancies that had Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) with non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD). Maternal outcomes included post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS); neonatal outcomes included admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 5-minute Apgar scores <7, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), jaundice, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma. The study population included 491 (2.1%) requiring KRFD, 1,257 (5.3%) requiring NRFD and 22,111 (93.0%) that had SVD. In pregnancies with NRFD compared to KRFD, there was higher incidence of OASIS (8.5% vs. 4.7%; p = .006) and a non-significant increased trend for PPH (15.0% vs. 12.4%; p = .173). There was no significant difference in rates of admission to NICU (p = .628), 5-minute Apgar score <7 (p = .375), HIE (p = .532), jaundice (p = .809), severe shoulder dystocia (p = .507) or birth trauma (p = .514). Our study demonstrates that KRFD has lower rates of maternal complications compared to NRFD whilst the rates of neonatal complications are similar.IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Kielland’s rotational forceps is used for achieving vaginal delivery in pregnancies with failure to progress in second stage of labour secondary to fetal malposition. The use of Kielland’s forceps has significantly declined in the last few decades due to concerns about an increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications, despite the absence of any major studies demonstrating this increased risk. What do the results of this study add? There are some studies which compare the risks in pregnancies delivering by Kiellands forceps with rotational ventouse deliveries but there is limited evidence comparing the risks of rotational with non-rotational forceps deliveries. Our study compares the major maternal and neonatal complications in a large cohort of pregnancies undergoing rotational vs. non-rotational forceps deliveries. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The results of our study demonstrate that maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies delivering by Kielland’s rotational forceps undertaken by appropriately trained obstetricians are either lower or similar to those delivering by non-rotational forceps. Consideration should be given to ensure that there is appropriate training provided to obstetricians to acquire skills in using Kielland’s forceps

Maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with and without pre-gestational diabetes mellitus

Objectives To compare pregnancy complications in pregnancies with and without pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (DM) managed in a multidisciplinary high-risk diabetes antenatal clinic. Methods This screening cohort study was undertaken at a large maternity unit in the United Kingdom between January 2010 and December 2022. We included singleton pregnancies that booked at our unit at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine risks of complications in pregnancies with type 1 and type 2 DM after adjusting for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Effect sizes were expressed as absolute risks (AR) and odds ratio (OR) (95 % confidence intervals [CI]). Results The study population included 53,649 singleton pregnancies, including 509 (1.0 %) with pre-existing DM and 49,122 (99.0 %) without diabetes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was a significant contribution from pre-existing DM in prediction of adverse outcomes, including antenatal complications such as fetal defects, stillbirth, preterm delivery, polyhydramnios, preeclampsia and delivery of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates; intrapartum complications such as caesarean delivery (CS) and post-partum haemorrhage; and neonatal complications including admission to neonatal intensive care unit, hypoglycaemia, jaundice and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). In particular, there was a 5-fold increased risk of stillbirth and HIE. Conclusions The maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with pre-existing DM are significantly increased compared to those without DM despite a decade of intensive multidisciplinary antenatal care. Further research is required to investigate strategies and interventions to prevent morbidity and mortality in pregnancies with pre-gestational DM

Efficiency of the Cerebroplacental Ratio in Identifying High-Risk Late-Term Pregnancies

Background and Objectives: Over the last few years, great interest has arisen in the role of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) to identify low-risk pregnancies at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to assess the predictive capacity of the CPR for adverse perinatal outcomes in all uncomplicated singleton pregnancies attending an appointment at 40–42 weeks. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive singleton pregnancies undergoing a routine prenatal care appointment after 40 weeks in three maternity units in Spain and the United Kingdom from January 2017 to December 2019. The primary outcome was adverse perinatal outcomes defined as stillbirth or neonatal death, cesarean section or instrumental delivery due to fetal distress during labor, umbilical arterial cord blood pH Results: A total of 3143 pregnancies were analyzed, including 537 (17.1%) with an adverse perinatal outcome. Maternal age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.04), body mass index (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06), racial origin (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.90 to 4.12), parity (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.45), and labor induction (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.35) were significant predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes with an area under the ROC curve of 0.743 (95% CI 0.720 to 0.766). The addition of the CPR to the previous model did not improve performance. Additionally, the CPR alone achieved a detection rate of only 11.9% (95% CI 9.3 to 15) when using the 10th centile as the screen-positive cutoff. Conclusions: Our data on late-term unselected pregnancies suggest that the CPR is a poor predictor of adverse perinatal outcomes