34 research outputs found

    Circolare in tempo di Coronavirus. L'Italia, la Spagna e la prospettiva europea

    Get PDF
    È oggetto d’indagine l’iniziativa delle istituzioni italo-spagnole di fronte alla pandemia da Covid-19, con specifico riguardo alle limitazioni imposte alla libertà di circolazione. L’ulteriore intenzione del paper è quella di ricercare le opzioni offerte dalla governance europea per affrontare le difficoltà multilivello poste in campo dall’emergenza sanitaria in ordine alla libertà di spostamento. Di tal guisa, elevando l’attenzione del lettore al rango del diritto dell’Unione europea, nonché all’iniziativa coordinatrice proposta dalle istituzioni eurounitarie durante “la prima ondata” della pandemia. Nell’obiettivo di positivizzare un comportamento comune a tutti gli Stati membri in relazione alla libertà di circolazione, è proposta una verifica delle disposizioni esistenti. I principi di leale collaborazione ex art. 4.3 Trattato dell’Unione Europea e di non discriminazione effettuata in base alla nazionalità ex art. 18 Trattato sul Funzionamento dell’Unione Europea potrebbero essere posti “sotto stress” in assenza di una disposizione comunitaria che goda dei principi di efficacia diretta e di supremazia? Nel caso di effetti giuridici “in potenza”, l’atto in questione sarebbe comunque ammissibile al giudizio di legalità della CGUE ai sensi dell’art. 263 TFUE? Ove fosse confutata tale tesi, sarebbe perciò scongiurabile un’eventuale procedura di infrazione in caso di inadempimento? Sicché, se affermativo, la Commissione dovrebbe “monitorare attentamente gli sviluppi” sull’applicazione di Schengen a mero scopo informativo/esortativo? Sarebbe questo sufficiente ad eludere il ritorno dello spettro dell’innalzamento di “muri e barriere” motu proprio da parte degli Stati, così come avvenuto durante la prima ondata della pandemia?The subject of the research is the initiative of Italian-Spanish institutions behind the Covid-19 pandemic, looking specifically at the limitations imposed to the the freedom of circulation. Moreover, the intention is to review the options given from the European governance to cope with the sanitary emergency in order to deal with the multilevel difficulties especially in the field of the freedom of movement. Meanwhile, we will bring the attention of the reader to the European level of law, as well as to the coordinating initiative proposed by European institutions during the pandemic "first wave". With the idea of positivizing a common attitude to all the member States in relation with the freedom of circulation, a list viable measures will be shown. The principles of loyal cooperation ex art. 4.3 TEU and of non-discrimination based on nationality ex art. 18 TFEU could be pit under stress without a communitarian provision afforded by the principles of direct effect and supremacy? In case of "potential" judiciary effects, the act would be admissible to the judgement of legality of the CJEU through art. 263 TFEU? Should this thesis be contested, would a possible procedure of infraction in case of non-fulfilment be avoided? Furthermore, if this is the case, should the Commission "monitor carefully the development" of the Schengen application for mere informative and exhortatory purposes? Would this be sufficient to avoid the raise of "walls and barriers" motu proprio by the member States, as it happened during the first wave of the pandemic?La investigación abarcará la iniciativa de las instituciones ítalo-españolas durante la pandemia del Covid-19, con particular atención a las limitaciones que afectan a la libertad de circulación. El objeto es investigar las opciones que ofrece la gobernanza europea para abordar las dificultades multinivel que plantea la emergencia sanitaria en términos de libertad de circulación. De esta manera, se pretende centrar la atención del lector en el nivel del derecho de la Unión Europea, y en la iniciativa de coordinación propuesta por las instituciones de la UE durante la "primera ola" de la pandemia. Para positivizar el comportamiento común de todos los Estados miembros en relación con la libertad de circulación, se propone una revisión de las disposiciones vigentes. ¿Los principios de cooperación leal conforme al art. 4.3 del TUE y de no discriminación por razón de nacionalidad ex art. 18 TFUE podrían verse afectados en ausencia de una disposición comunitaria que goce de eficacia directa y de supremacía? En el caso de efectos jurídicos "en potencia", ¿el acto en cuestión sería admisible ante el juicio de legalidad del TJUE planteado conforme al art. 263 TFUE? Si esta tesis fuera refutada, ¿sería posible evitar un procedimiento de infracción en caso de incumplimiento? En definitiva, si esto se confirmara, ¿debería la Comisión "supervisar atentamente la evolución" de la aplicación de Schengen únicamente con fines informativos o exhortativos? ¿Sería esto suficiente para eludir el regreso del espectro del levantamiento de "muros y barreras" motu proprio por parte de los Estados, como aconteció durante la primera ola de la pandemia

    Could β-hemolytic, group B Enterococcus faecalis be mistaken for Streptococcus agalactiae?

    Get PDF
    AbstractA β-hemolytic Enterococcus faecalis strain agglutinating Lancefield group A, B, C, D, F, and G antisera was observed from a rectovaginal swab, in the context of antenatal screening for Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus [GBS]). This is the first multi-Lancefield antisera-agglutinating isolate of this species, and it raised particular concern, as it may mimic GBS, leading to false reporting and useless receipt of intrapartum antibiotics

    ABCC Multidrug Transporters in Childhood Neuroblastoma: Clinical and Biological Effects Independent of Cytotoxic Drug Efflux

    Get PDF
    Background Although the prognostic value of the ATP-binding cassette, subfamily C (ABCC) transporters in childhood neuroblastoma is usually attributed to their role in cytotoxic drug efflux, certain observations have suggested that these multidrug transporters might contribute to the malignant phenotype independent of cytotoxic drug efflux. Methods A v-myc myelocytomatosis viral related oncogene, neuroblastoma derived (MYCN)-driven transgenic mouse neuroblastoma model was crossed with an Abcc1-deficient mouse strain (658 hMYCN1/−, 205 hMYCN+/1 mice) or, alternatively, treated with the ABCC1 inhibitor, Reversan (n = 20). ABCC genes were suppressed using short interfering RNA or overexpressed by stable transfection in neuroblastoma cell lines BE(2)-C, SH-EP, and SH-SY5Y, which were then assessed for wound closure ability, clonogenic capacity, morphological differentiation, and cell growth. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to examine the clinical significance of ABCC family gene expression in a large prospectively accrued cohort of patients (n = 209) with primary neuroblastomas. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to test for associations with event-free and overall survival. Except where noted, all statistical tests were two-sided. Results Inhibition of ABCC1 statistically significantly inhibited neuroblastoma development in hMYCN transgenic mice (mean age for palpable tumor: treated mice, 47.2 days; control mice, 41.9 days; hazard ratio [HR] = 9.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.65 to 32; P < .001). Suppression of ABCC1 in vitro inhibited wound closure (P < .001) and clonogenicity (P = .006); suppression of ABCC4 enhanced morphological differentiation (P < .001) and inhibited cell growth (P < .001). Analysis of 209 neuroblastoma patient tumors revealed that, in contrast with ABCC1 and ABCC4, low rather than high ABCC3 expression was associated with reduced event-free survival (HR of recurrence or death = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.4 to 4.2; P = .001), with 23 of 53 patients with low ABCC3 expression experiencing recurrence or death compared with 31 of 155 patients with high ABCC3. Moreover, overexpression of ABCC3 in vitro inhibited neuroblastoma cell migration (P < .001) and clonogenicity (P = .03). The combined expression of ABCC1, ABCC3, and ABCC4 was associated with patients having an adverse event, such that of the 12 patients with the "poor prognosis” expression pattern, 10 experienced recurrence or death (HR of recurrence or death = 12.3, 95% CI = 6 to 27; P < .001). Conclusion ABCC transporters can affect neuroblastoma biology independently of their role in chemotherapeutic drug efflux, enhancing their potential as targets for therapeutic interventio

    SIRT1 Promotes N-Myc Oncogenesis through a Positive Feedback Loop Involving the Effects of MKP3 and ERK on N-Myc Protein Stability

    Get PDF
    The N-Myc oncoprotein is a critical factor in neuroblastoma tumorigenesis which requires additional mechanisms converting a low-level to a high-level N-Myc expression. N-Myc protein is stabilized when phosphorylated at Serine 62 by phosphorylated ERK protein. Here we describe a novel positive feedback loop whereby N-Myc directly induced the transcription of the class III histone deacetylase SIRT1, which in turn increased N-Myc protein stability. SIRT1 binds to Myc Box I domain of N-Myc protein to form a novel transcriptional repressor complex at gene promoter of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 3 (MKP3), leading to transcriptional repression of MKP3, ERK protein phosphorylation, N-Myc protein phosphorylation at Serine 62, and N-Myc protein stabilization. Importantly, SIRT1 was up-regulated, MKP3 down-regulated, in pre-cancerous cells, and preventative treatment with the SIRT1 inhibitor Cambinol reduced tumorigenesis in TH-MYCN transgenic mice. Our data demonstrate the important roles of SIRT1 in N-Myc oncogenesis and SIRT1 inhibitors in the prevention and therapy of N-Myc–induced neuroblastoma

    Global management of a common, underrated surgical task during the COVID-19 pandemic: Gallstone disease - An international survery

    Get PDF
    Background: Since the Coronavirus disease-19(COVID-19) pandemic, the healthcare systems are reallocating their medical resources, with consequent narrowed access to elective surgery for benign conditions such as gallstone disease(GD). This survey represents an overview of the current policies regarding the surgical management of patients with GD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A Web-based survey was conducted among 36 Hepato-Prancreato-Biliary surgeons from 14 Countries. Through a 17-item questionnaire, participants were asked about the local management of patients with GD since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The majority (n = 26,72.2%) of surgeons reported an alarming decrease in the cholecystectomy rate for GD since the start of the pandemic, regardless of the Country: 19(52.7%) didn't operate any GD, 7(19.4%) reduced their surgical activity by 50–75%, 10(27.8%) by 25–50%, 1(2.8%) maintained regular activity. Currently, only patients with GD complications are operated. Thirty-two (88.9%) participants expect these changes to last for at least 3 months. In 15(41.6%) Centers, patients are currently being screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection before cholecystectomy [in 10(27.8%) Centers only in the presence of suspected infection, in 5(13.9%) routinely]. The majority of surgeons (n = 29,80.6%) have adopted a laparoscopic approach as standard surgery, 5(13.9%) perform open cholecystectomy in patients with known/suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 2(5.6%) in all patients. Conclusion

    Myc-mediated control of gene transcription in cancer cells

    Get PDF
    The Myc oncoproteins belong to a family of transcription factors composed by Myc, N-Myc and L-Myc. The most studied components of this family are Myc and N-Myc because their expressions are frequently deregulated in a wide range of cancers. These oncoproteins can act both as activators or repressors of gene transcription. As activators, they heterodimerize with Max (Myc associated X-factor) and the heterodimer recognizes and binds a specific sequence elements (E-Box) onto gene promoters recruiting histone acetylase and inducing transcriptional activation. Myc-mediated transcriptional repression is a quite debated issue. One of the first mechanisms defined for the Myc-mediated transcriptional repression consisted in the interaction of Myc-Max complex Sp1 and/or Miz1 transcription factors already bound to gene promoters. This interaction may interfere with their activation functions by recruiting co-repressors such as Dnmt3 or HDACs. Moreover, in the absence of , Myc may interfere with the Sp1 activation function by direct interaction and subsequent recruitment of HDACs. More recently the Myc/Max complex was also shown to mediate transcriptional repression by direct binding to peculiar E-box. In this study we analyzed the role of Myc overexpression in Osteosarcoma and Neuroblastoma oncogenesis and the mechanisms underling to Myc function. Myc overexpression is known to correlate with chemoresistance in Osteosarcoma cells. We extended this study by demonstrating that c-Myc induces transcription of a panel of ABC drug transporter genes. ABCs are a large family trans-membrane transporter deeply involved in multi drug resistance. Furthermore expression levels of Myc, ABCC1, ABCC4 and ABCF1 were proved to be important prognostic tool to predict conventional therapy failure. N-Myc amplification/overexpression is the most important prognostic factor for Neuroblastoma. Cyclin G2 and Clusterin are two genes often down regulated in neuroblastoma cells. Cyclin G2 is an atypical member of Cyclin family and its expression is associated with terminal differentiation and apoptosis. Moreover it blocks cell cycle progression and induces cell growth arrest. Instead, CLU is a multifunctional protein involved in many physiological and pathological processes. Several lines of evidences support the view that CLU may act as a tumour suppressor in Neuroblastoma. In this thesis I showed that N-Myc represses CCNG2 and CLU transcription by different mechanisms. • N-Myc represses CCNG2 transcription by directly interacting with Sp1 bound in CCNG2 promoter and recruiting HDAC2. Importantly, reactivation of CCNG2 expression through epigenetic drugs partially reduces N-Myc and HDAC2 mediated cell proliferation. • N-Myc/Max complex represses CLU expression by direct binding to a peculiar E-box element on CLU promoter and by recruitment of HDACs and Polycomb Complexes, to the CLU promoter. Overall our findings strongly support the model in which Myc overexpression/amplification may contribute to some aspects of oncogenesis by a dual action: i) transcription activation of genes that confer a multidrug resistant phenotype to cancer cells; ii), transcription repression of genes involved in cell cycle inhibition and cellular differentiation

    Due modelli costituzionali per governare l\u2019emergenza. Italia e Spagna alla prova del Coronavirus

    No full text
    The Covid-19 pandemic has forced governments of all States around the world to adopt unprecedented prevention and contrast Acts. If there is no constitutionalization of the state of alarm in Italy, the Spanish Constitution provides for a tripartition of possible emergency situations. The aim of the paper is to propose an analysis of the response provided by different models to the same health crisis, in order to assess which ones ensures better stability of the system of sources

    MYCN-mediated transcriptional repression in neuroblastoma: the other side of the coin.

    Get PDF
    Neuroblastoma is the most common extra cranial solid tumor in childhood and the most frequently diagnosed neoplasm during the infancy. MYCN amplification and overexpression occur in about 25% of total neuroblastoma cases and this percentage increases at 30% in advanced stage neuroblastoma. So far, MYCN expression profile is still one of the most robust and significant prognostic markers for neuroblastoma outcome. MYCN is a transcription factor that belongs to the family of MYC oncoproteins, comprising c-MYC and MYCL genes. Deregulation of MYC oncoprotein expression is a crucial event involved in the occurrence of different types of malignant tumors. MYCN, as well as c-MYC, can heterodimerize with its partner MAX and activate the transcription of several target genes containing E-Box sites in their promoter regions. However, recent several lines of evidence have revealed that MYCN can repress at least as many genes as it activates, thus proposing a novel function of this protein in neuroblastoma biology. Whereas the mechanism by which MYCN can act as a transcriptional activator is relatively well known, very few studies has been done in the attempt to explain how MYCN can exert its transcription repression function. Here, we will review current knowledge about the mechanism of MYCN-mediated transcriptional repression and will emphasize its role as a repressor in the recruitment of a precise set of proteins to form complexes capable of down-regulating specific subsets of genes whose function is actively involved in apoptosis, cell differentiation, chemosensitivity, and cell motility. The finding that MYCN can also act as a repressor has widen our view on its role in oncogenesis and has posed the bases to search for novel therapeutic drugs that can specifically target its transcriptional repression function.Neuroblastoma is the most common extra cranial solid tumor in childhood and the most frequently diagnosed neoplasm during the infancy. MYCN amplification and overexpression occur in about 25% of total neuroblastoma cases and this percentage increases at 30% in advanced stage neuroblastoma. So far, MYCN expression profile is still one of the most robust and significant prognostic markers for neuroblastoma outcome. MYCN is a transcription factor that belongs to the family of MYC oncoproteins, comprising c-MYC and MYCL genes. Deregulation of MYC oncoprotein expression is a crucial event involved in the occurrence of different types of malignant tumors. MYCN, as well as c-MYC, can heterodimerize with its partner MAX and activate the transcription of several target genes containing E-Box sites in their promoter regions. However, recent several lines of evidence have revealed that MYCN can repress at least as many genes as it activates, thus proposing a novel function of this protein in neuroblastoma biology. Whereas the mechanism by which MYCN can act as a transcriptional activator is relatively well known, very few studies has been done in the attempt to explain how MYCN can exert its transcription repression function. Here, we will review current knowledge about the mechanism of MYCN-mediated transcriptional repression and will emphasize its role as a repressor in the recruitment of a precise set of proteins to form complexes capable of down-regulating specific subsets of genes whose function is actively involved in apoptosis, cell differentiation, chemosensitivity, and cell motility. The finding that MYCN can also act as a repressor has widen our view on its role in oncogenesis and has posed the bases to search for novel therapeutic drugs that can specifically target its transcriptional repression function. \ua9 2013 Gherardi, Valli, Erriquez and Perini

    A genome-scale shRNA screen identifies GSK3 as a critical regulator of p75NTR transcription in high risk neuroblastoma

    No full text
    Our findings support a model in which the GSK3 pathway can exerts a negative control on p75NTR transcription in high risk neuroblastoma and highlight the possibility to use GSK3 inhibitors as potential therapeutic drugs to treat neuroblastoma with low p75NTR
    corecore