Defining near-complete response following (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: systematic review

This review identified the various terminology, features, and criteria used in the literature to define a near-complete response. This heterogeneity in criteria and features is probably related to the differences in therapeutic aim (watchful waiting versus additional treatment aiming at organ preservation). In the future, more evidence should be gathered that support the use of specific features at response evaluation to define a near-complete response.Background A uniform definition of a clinical near-complete response (near-CR) after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer is lacking. A clear definition is necessary for uniformity in clinical practice and trial enrolment for organ-preserving treatments. This review aimed to provide an overview of the terminology, criteria, and features used in the literature to define a near-CR. Methods A systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA statement. PubMed and Embase were searched up to May 2021 to identify the terminology, criteria, and features used to define a near-CR after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Studies with no clear cut-off point between a cCR and near-CR, studies using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, and studies including only complete responders were excluded. Results A total of 1876 articles were found, of which 23 were included. Patients were managed by watchful waiting and/or additional local treatment in 11 and 17 of 23 studies respectively. Response evaluation included digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or endoscopy with MRI in 18 studies. The majority of studies used the term 'near-complete response'. In most studies, minor irregularities or a smooth induration with DRE and a small flat ulcer on endoscopy were considered to indicate a near-CR. On MRI, five studies used features (obvious downstaging with or without heterogeneous/irregular fibrosis on T2-weighted MRI or small spot of high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging), five studies used TNM criteria (ycT2), and four used magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) (mrTRG1-2/mrTRG2) to describe a near-CR. Conclusion The terminology, criteria, and features used to describe a near-CR vary substantially, which can partly be explained by the different treatment strategies patients are selected for (watchful waiting or additional local treatment). A reproducible definition of near-CR is required.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

Long-term exposure to circulating platinum is associated with late effects of treatment in testicular cancer survivors

BACKGROUND: The success of cisplatin-based (Platinol, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New York, NY, USA) chemotherapy for testicular cancer comes at the price of long-term and late effects related to healthy tissue damage. We assessed and modelled serum platinum (Pt) decay after chemotherapy and determined relationships between long-term circulating Pt levels and known late effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 99 testicular cancer survivors, treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, serum and 24-h urine samples were collected during follow-up (1–13 years after treatment). To build a population pharmacokinetic model, measured Pt data were simultaneously analysed, together with cisplatin dose, age, weight and height using the NONMEM software. Based on this model, area under the curve between 1 and 3 years after treatment (Pt AUC(1–3 years)) was calculated for each patient. Predicted long-term Pt exposure was related to renal function and to late effects of treatment assessed median 9 (3–15) years after chemotherapy. RESULTS: Decay of Pt was best described by a two-compartment model. Mean terminal T(1/2) was 3.7 (range 2.5–5.2) years. Pt AUC(1–3 years) correlated with cumulative cisplatin dose, and creatinine clearance before and 1 year after treatment. Patients with paraesthesia had higher Pt AUC(1–3 years) (30.9 versus 27.0 µg/l month) compared with those without paraesthesia (P = 0.021). Patients with hypogonadism, elevated LDL-cholesterol levels or hypertension also had higher Pt AUC(1–3 years). CONCLUSIONS: Renal function before and after cisplatin treatment is an important determinant of long-term Pt exposure. Known long-term effects of testicular cancer treatment, such as paraesthesia, hypogonadism, hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension, are associated with long-term circulating Pt exposure

Defining near-complete response following (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: systematic review

This review identified the various terminology, features, and criteria used in the literature to define a near-complete response. This heterogeneity in criteria and features is probably related to the differences in therapeutic aim (watchful waiting versus additional treatment aiming at organ preservation). In the future, more evidence should be gathered that support the use of specific features at response evaluation to define a near-complete response.Background A uniform definition of a clinical near-complete response (near-CR) after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer is lacking. A clear definition is necessary for uniformity in clinical practice and trial enrolment for organ-preserving treatments. This review aimed to provide an overview of the terminology, criteria, and features used in the literature to define a near-CR. Methods A systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA statement. PubMed and Embase were searched up to May 2021 to identify the terminology, criteria, and features used to define a near-CR after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Studies with no clear cut-off point between a cCR and near-CR, studies using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, and studies including only complete responders were excluded. Results A total of 1876 articles were found, of which 23 were included. Patients were managed by watchful waiting and/or additional local treatment in 11 and 17 of 23 studies respectively. Response evaluation included digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or endoscopy with MRI in 18 studies. The majority of studies used the term 'near-complete response'. In most studies, minor irregularities or a smooth induration with DRE and a small flat ulcer on endoscopy were considered to indicate a near-CR. On MRI, five studies used features (obvious downstaging with or without heterogeneous/irregular fibrosis on T2-weighted MRI or small spot of high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging), five studies used TNM criteria (ycT2), and four used magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) (mrTRG1-2/mrTRG2) to describe a near-CR. Conclusion The terminology, criteria, and features used to describe a near-CR vary substantially, which can partly be explained by the different treatment strategies patients are selected for (watchful waiting or additional local treatment). A reproducible definition of near-CR is required

Watch and wait after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: comparison of outcomes in patients with and without a complete response at first reassessment in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD)

Background: In rectal cancer, watch and wait for patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant treatment has an established evidence base. However, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and management of a near-cCR. This study aimed to compare outcomes in patients who achieved a cCR at first reassessment versus later reassessment. Methods: This registry study included patients from the International Watch & Wait Database. Patients were categorized as having a cCR at first reassessment or at later reassessment (that is near-cCR at first reassessment) based on MRI and endoscopy. Organ preservation, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were calculated. Subgroup analyses were done for near-cCR groups based on the response evaluation according to modality. Results: A total of 1010 patients were identified. At first reassessment, 608 patients had a cCR; 402 had a cCR at later reassessment. Median follow-up was 2.6 years for patients with a cCR at first reassessment and 2.9 years for those with a cCR at later reassessment. The 2-year organ preservation rate was 77.8 (95 per cent c.i. 74.2 to 81.5) and 79.3 (75.1 to 83.7) per cent respectively (P = 0.499). Similarly, no differences were found between groups in distant metastasis-free survival or overall survival rate. Subgroup analyses showed a higher organ preservation rate in the group with a near-cCR categorized exclusively by MRI. Conclusion: Oncological outcomes for patients with a cCR at later reassessment are no worse than those of patients with a cCR at first reassessment.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio