Differences in quality of life across renal replacement therapies: A meta-analytic comparison

A meta-analysis compared emotional distress and psychological well-being across renal replacement therapies (RRTs) and examined whether differences could be explained by: (1) treatment modalities, (2) case mix, or (3) methodologic rigor. Standard meta-analytic procedures were used to evaluate published comparative studies. Successful renal transplantation was associated with: (1) lower distress (effect size, d = −0.43 SD) and greater well-being (d = 0.62 SD) than incenter hemodialysis (CHD) and (2) lower distress (d = −0.29 SD) and greater well-being (d = 0.53 SD) than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). CAPD was characterized by greater well-being (d = 0.18 SD) than CHD and CHD was associated with greater distress (d = 0.16 SD) than home hemodialysis. Although methodologic rigor and case-mix differences did not correlate with the magnitude of psychosocial differences across RRTs, 10 of the 12 comparisons (83%) were threatened by publication bias (ie, that nonsignificant comparisons may have been underrepresented in the published literature). Thus, although significant quality-of-life differences were evident across treatment groups, the types of patients representative of the various RRTs also differed significantly in terms of case-mix variables relevant to psychosocial well-being and emotional distress. Published findings indicating differential quality of life across RRTs may thus be attributable to: (1) valid differences in effective renal replacement, reduced medical complications, and lifestyles afforded by these treatment modalities; (2) case-mix differences in the patient samples selected to represent them in research comparisons; or (3) both of these alternative explanations

Sex differences in predictors of illness intrusiveness 1 year after a cardiac event

Objective: This prospective study examined sex differences in illness intrusiveness and in baseline predictors of illness intrusiveness in cardiac patients' I-year postcardiac event. Methods: Patients diagnosed with a myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina (UA) completed a baseline questionnaire during their hospitalization (139 men and 104 women). Eighty-one men and 67 women completed the follow-up questionnaire I-year postcardiac event. The questionnaire included measures of illness intrusiveness in three life domains, depressive symptomatology, social support, medical information, risk factors for heart disease, and sociodemographic information. Results: A MANCOVA with the three Illness Intrusiveness subscales as dependent variables, sex as the between-group factor, and partnership status as a covariate found a sex effect for the Intimacy subscale, but not for the Instrumental and the Relationships/Personal Development subscales. Men reported more intrusiveness in the Intimacy domain of their life as compared to women. After controlling for sociodemographic factors and risk factors for heart disease, hierarchical regressions indicated sex differences in baseline predictors of I-year follow-up illness intrusiveness in the three life domains. For men, being satisfied with support from partner at baseline was associated with less intrusiveness in the Instrumental Life domain 1 year after the cardiac event. For women, surprisingly, more satisfaction with support from their partner at baseline was associated with more intrusiveness in their intimate lives 1 year after their cardiac event. In addition, emotional symptoms of depression at baseline were predictive ofincreased illness intrusiveness in Relationship/Personal Development and Intimacy domains for men and in Instrumental and Intimacy domains for women. Conclusion: Support from partner may have a differential impact for men and women after a cardiac event. Depressive symptomatology during initial hospitalization, particularly emotional symptoms, is a prominent indicator ofillness intrusiveness for both sexes 1 year after the cardiac event.We acknowledge the support of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada for a research grant to investigate sex differences in patients following a cardiac event to Drs. Abbey, Stewart, Irvine, and Shnek. This research was supported in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through a Senior Investigator Award to G.M. Devins.We acknowledge the support of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada for a research grant to investigate sex differences in patients following a cardiac event to Drs. Abbey, Stewart, Irvine, and Shnek. This research was supported in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through a Senior Investigator Award to G.M. Devins

Empirical validation of the English version of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory

PURPOSE: Cancer patients report that help in managing fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of their greatest unmet needs. Research on FCR has been limited by the very few validated, multi-dimensional measures of this construct. One exception is the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI), originally developed and empirically validated in French. The present study validated the English version of the FCRI. METHODS: The FCRI was translated into English using a forward-backward translation procedure and pilot-tested with 17 English-speaking cancer patients. Cross-cultural equivalency of the French and English versions was established by administering both forms to 42 bilingual cancer patients. Last, 350 English-speaking breast, colon, prostate, or lung cancer patients were asked to complete the FCRI. A subsample (n = 135) was mailed the FCRI again one month later to evaluate test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The English translation of the FCRI was well accepted by participants. There was no item-bias when comparing bilingual participants' answers on both versions. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized seven-factor structure. The English version has high internal consistency (α = .96 for the total scale and .71-.94 for the subscales) and test-retest reliability (r = .88 for the total scale and 56-.87 for the subscales). CONCLUSIONS: The English version of the FCRI is a reliable and valid measure of FCR applicable to breast, colon, prostate, and lung cancer patients. Its multi-dimensional nature makes it an attractive research and clinical tool to further our knowledge of FCR

Development of a psychoeducational intervention for people affected by pancreatic cancer

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer has one of the highest mortality rates of any malignancy, placing a substantial burden on patients and families with high unmet informational and supportive care needs. Nevertheless, access to psychosocial and palliative care services for the individuals affected is limited. There is a need for standardized approaches to facilitate adjustment and to improve knowledge about the disease and its anticipated impact. In this intervention-development paper guided by implementation science principles, we report the rationale, methods, and processes employed in developing an interdisciplinary group psychoeducational intervention for people affected by pancreatic cancer. The acceptability and feasibility of implementation will be evaluated as a part of a subsequent feasibility study. Methods The Schofield and Chambers framework for designing sustainable self-management interventions in cancer care informed the development of the intervention content and format. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research served as an overarching guide of the implementation process, including the development phase and the formative evaluation plan of implementation. Results A representative team of stakeholders collaboratively developed and tailored the intervention content and format with attention to the principles of implementation science, including available resourcing. The final intervention prototype was designed as a single group-session led by an interdisciplinary clinical team with expertise in caring for patients with pancreatic cancer and their families and in addressing nutrition guidelines, disease and symptom management, communication with family and health care providers, family impact of cancer, preparing for the future, and palliative and supportive care services. Conclusions The present paper describes the development of a group psychoeducational intervention to address the informational and supportive care needs of people affected by pancreatic cancer. Consideration of implementation science during intervention development efforts can optimize uptake and sustainability in the clinical setting. Our approach may be utilized as a framework for the design and implementation of similar initiatives to support people affected by diseases with limited prognoses