33 research outputs found
South African Strategy: The Strategy of an International Pariah
South Africa\u27s apartheid policy has lost her a relationship with the West, particularly the United States, that might otherwise exist and has required that she develop new and imaginative solutions to her strategic problems
Microfluidic Devices for Analysis of Spatial Orientation Behaviors in Semi-Restrained Caenorhabditis elegans
This article describes the fabrication and use of microfluidic devices for investigating spatial orientation behaviors in nematode worms (Caenorhabditis elegans). Until now, spatial orientation has been studied in freely moving nematodes in which the frequency and nature of encounters with the gradient are uncontrolled experimental variables. In the new devices, the nematode is held in place by a restraint that aligns the longitudinal axis of the body with the border between two laminar fluid streams, leaving the animal's head and tail free to move. The content of the fluid streams can be manipulated to deliver step gradients in space or time. We demonstrate the utility of the device by identifying previously uncharacterized aspects of the behavioral mechanisms underlying chemotaxis, osmotic avoidance, and thermotaxis in this organism. The new devices are readily adaptable to behavioral and imaging studies involving fluid borne stimuli in a wide range of sensory modalities
Large Scale Benchmark of Materials Design Methods
Lack of rigorous reproducibility and validation are major hurdles for
scientific development across many fields. Materials science in particular
encompasses a variety of experimental and theoretical approaches that require
careful benchmarking. Leaderboard efforts have been developed previously to
mitigate these issues. However, a comprehensive comparison and benchmarking on
an integrated platform with multiple data modalities with both perfect and
defect materials data is still lacking. This work introduces
JARVIS-Leaderboard, an open-source and community-driven platform that
facilitates benchmarking and enhances reproducibility. The platform allows
users to set up benchmarks with custom tasks and enables contributions in the
form of dataset, code, and meta-data submissions. We cover the following
materials design categories: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Electronic Structure
(ES), Force-fields (FF), Quantum Computation (QC) and Experiments (EXP). For
AI, we cover several types of input data, including atomic structures,
atomistic images, spectra, and text. For ES, we consider multiple ES
approaches, software packages, pseudopotentials, materials, and properties,
comparing results to experiment. For FF, we compare multiple approaches for
material property predictions. For QC, we benchmark Hamiltonian simulations
using various quantum algorithms and circuits. Finally, for experiments, we use
the inter-laboratory approach to establish benchmarks. There are 1281
contributions to 274 benchmarks using 152 methods with more than 8 million
data-points, and the leaderboard is continuously expanding. The
JARVIS-Leaderboard is available at the website:
https://pages.nist.gov/jarvis_leaderboar
Factors associated with self-rated health status in university students: a cross-sectional study in three European countries
Mikolajczyk RT, Brzoska P, Maier C, et al. Factors associated with self-rated health status in university students: a cross-sectional study in three European countries. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1): 215.Background: Self-rated health status (SRHS) is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the subjective and objective health of individuals. Previous studies have either focused predominantly on the elderly or investigated only a narrow range of factors potentially associated with SRHS. In examining student populations, these past studies were limited to single countries. The objectives of this study were to assess which candidate variables were independently associated with SRHS in university students, to compare these variables by country and by gender, and to investigate which of the variables was most important as a rating frame for SRHS. Methods: The data is from the Cross-National Student Health Survey, conducted in 2005 in universities in Germany, Bulgaria, and Poland (n = 2103; mean age = 20.7 years). SRHS was assessed with a single question using a five-point scale ranging from "excellent" to "poor". The study also measured a wide range of variables including: physical and psychological health, studying, social contacts/social support, and socio-demographic status. Results: Psychosomatic complaints (considered an aspect of physical health and, adjusted for psychological health) were the most important indicators in forming a rating frame for students' SRHS. There were few differences in the effects of variables associated with SRHS by gender (well-being: a measure of psychological health) and the variables associated with SRHS by country (well-being and self-efficacy). The remaining variables showed homogenous effects for both genders and for all three countries. Conclusion: The results suggest that SRHS can be reasonably used to compare students' health across countries. SRHS is affected by different physical, psychological and psychosomatic aspects of health; however, its strongest association is with psychosomatic complaints