Experience with fulvestrant acetate in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

Gasent Blesa, JM.; Alberola Candel, V.; Giner Marco, V.; Giner-Bosch, V.; Provencio Pulla, M.; Laforga Canales, JB. (2010). Experience with fulvestrant acetate in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Annals of Oncology. 21(5):1131-1132. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq010S11311132215Fawell, S. E., White, R., Hoare, S., Sydenham, M., Page, M., & Parker, M. G. (1990). Inhibition of estrogen receptor-DNA binding by the «pure» antiestrogen ICI 164,384 appears to be mediated by impaired receptor dimerization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(17), 6883-6887. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.17.6883Dauvois, S., Danielian, P. S., White, R., & Parker, M. G. (1992). Antiestrogen ICI 164,384 reduces cellular estrogen receptor content by increasing its turnover. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(9), 4037-4041. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.9.4037Leav, I., Lau, K.-M., Adams, J. Y., McNeal, J. E., Taplin, M.-E., Wang, J., … Ho, S.-M. (2001). Comparative Studies of the Estrogen Receptors β and α and the Androgen Receptor in Normal Human Prostate Glands, Dysplasia, and in Primary and Metastatic Carcinoma. The American Journal of Pathology, 159(1), 79-92. doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61676-8Bhattacharyya, R. S. (2006). Fulvestrant (ICI 182,780) down-regulates androgen receptor expression and diminishes androgenic responses in LNCaP human prostate cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 5(6), 1539-1549. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-06-0065Galsky, M. D., Simon, K., Sonpavde, G., Hutson, T. E., Fleming, M., Kondagunta, G. V., & Berry, W. (2009). Ketoconazole retains activity in patients with docetaxel-refractory prostate cancer. Annals of Oncology, 20(5), 965-966. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp199Serrate, C., Loriot, Y., De La Motte Rouge, T., Gross-Goupil, M., Massard, C., Escudier, B., … Fizazi, K. (2009). Diethylstilbestrol (DES) retains activity and is a reasonable option in patients previously treated with docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Annals of Oncology, 20(5), 965-965. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp112Chadha, M. K., Ashraf, U., Lawrence, D., Tian, L., Levine, E., Silliman, C., … Trump, D. L. (2008). Phase II study of fulvestrant (faslodex®) in castration resistant prostate cancer. The Prostate, 68(13), 1461-1466. doi:10.1002/pros.2081

Evolving Patterns of Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Do We Need to Perform Routine Bone Imaging?

Advance diagnostic and treatment modalities have improved outcomes for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, but the prognosis for those with metastatic disease (mRCC) remains poor. As given metastatic distribution is critical in guiding treatment decisions for mRCC patients, we evaluated evolving metastatic patterns to assess if our current practice standards effectively address patient needs. A systematic literature review was performed to identify all publicly available prospective clinical trials in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) from 1990 to 2018. A total of 16,899 mRCC patients from 127 qualified phase I–III clinical trials with metastatic site documentations were included for analysis for incidence of metastases to lung, liver, bone, and lymph nodes (LNs) over time. Studies were categorized into three treatment eras based on the timing of regulatory approval: Cytokine Era (1990-2004), vascular endothelial growth factor/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Era (2005-2016), and immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI Era (ICI-TKI, 2017-2018) and also classified as first-line only (FLO) or second-line and beyond (SLB). Overall, an increase in the incidence of bone and LNs metastases in FLO and SLB, and lung metastases in FLO, was seen over the three treatment eras. Generally, the burden of disease is higher in SLB when compared with FLO. Importantly, in the ICI-TKI era, the incidences of bone metastasis are 28% in FLO and 29% in SLB settings. The disease burden in patients with mRCC has increased steadily over the past three decades. Given the unexpectedly high rate of bone metastasis, routine dedicated bone imaging should be considered in all patients with mRCC

Impact of zumor mutation burden on nivolumab efficacy in second-line urothelial carcinoma patients: Exploratory analysis of the phase ii checkmate 275 study

n/

Risk of infections in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and non-RCC patients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors

Background: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used in a variety of malignancies. Infections have been reported with these drugs. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterise the risk of infections in cancer patients treated with these agents. Methods: Pubmed and oncology conferences' proceedings were searched for studies from January 1966 to June 2012. Studies were limited to phase II and III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of everolimus or temsirolimus reporting on cancer patients with adequate safety profiles. Summary incidences, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 3180 patients were included. The incidence of all-grade and high-grade infections due to mTOR inhibitors was 33.1% (95% CI, 24.5–43.0%) and 5.6% (95% CI, 3.8–8.3%), respectively. Compared with controls, the RR of all-grade and high-grade infections due to mTOR inhibitors was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.76–2.28, P<0.001) and 2.60 (95% CI, 1.54–4.41, P<0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis found no difference in incidences or risks between everolimus and temsirolimus or between different tumour types (renal cell carcinoma (RCC) vs non-RCC). Infections included respiratory tract (61.7%), genitourinary (29.4%), skin/soft tissue (4.2%), and others (4.9%). Conclusion: Treatment with mTOR inhibitors is associated with a significant increase in risk of infections. Close monitoring for any signs of infections is warranted

Phase 1/2 multiple ascending dose trial of the prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted antibody drug conjugate MLN2704 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

This phase 1/2 study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of MLN2704, a humanized monoclonal antibody MLN591 targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen, linked to the maytansinoid DM1 in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Phase 1b study to assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of pamiparib in combination with temozolomide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

BackgroundPamiparib is a potent, selective, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor that demonstrates synthetic lethality in cells with breast cancer susceptibility gene mutations or other homologous recombination deficiency. This two-stage phase 1b study (NCT03150810) assessed pamiparib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in adult patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced and metastatic solid tumors.MethodsOral pamiparib 60 mg was administered twice daily. During the dose-escalation stage, increasing doses of TMZ (40-120 mg once daily pulsed or 20-40 mg once daily continuous) were administered to determine the recommended dose to be administered in the dose-expansion stage. The primary objectives were to determine safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated/administered dose, recommended phase 2 dose and schedule, and antitumor activity of pamiparib in combination with TMZ. Pharmacokinetics of pamiparib and TMZ and biomarkers were also assessed.ResultsAcross stages, 139 patients were treated (dose escalation, n = 66; dose expansion, n = 73). The maximum tolerated dose of TMZ, which was administered during dose expansion, was 7-day pulsed 60 mg once daily. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (dose escalation, 56.1%; dose expansion, 63.0%), nausea (dose escalation, 54.5%; dose expansion, 49.3%), and fatigue (dose escalation, 48.5%; dose expansion, 47.9%). In the dose-escalation stage, four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (three neutropenia and one neutrophil count decreased). No TEAEs considered to be related to study drug treatment resulted in death. Antitumor activity was modest, indicated by confirmed overall response rate (dose escalation, 13.8%; dose expansion, 11.6%), median progression-free survival (3.7 and 2.8 months), and median overall survival (10.5 and 9.2 months). Administration of combination therapy did not notably impact pamiparib or TMZ pharmacokinetics.ConclusionsPamiparib in combination with TMZ had a manageable safety profile. Further investigation of the efficacy of this combination in tumor types with specific DNA damage repair deficiencies is warranted

Poor prognosis among radiation associated bladder cancer is defined by clinicogenomic features

Radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer has been associated with an increased risk for the development of bladder cancer. We aimed to integrate clinical and genomic data to better understand the development of RT-associated bladder cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed to identify control (CTRL; n= 41) and RT-associated (n=41) bladder cancer patients. RT and CTRL specific features were then identified through integration and analysis of the genomic sequencing data and clinical variables. RT-associated bladder tumors were significantly enriched for alterations in KDM6A and ATM, while CTRL tumors were enriched for CDKN2A mutation. Globally, there was an increased number of variants within RT tumors, albeit at a lower variant allele frequency. Mutational signature analysis revealed three predominate motif patterns, with similarity to SBS2/13 (APOBEC3A), SBS5 (ERCC2/Smoking) and SBS6/15 (MMR). Poor prognostic factors in the RT cohort include, a short tumor latency, smoking status, the presence of the smoking and XRT mutational signatures, and CDKN2A copy number loss. Based on the clinical and genomic findings, we suggest, at least two potential pathways leading to RT-associated bladder cancer; the first, occurs in the setting of field cancerization, related to smoking or pre-existing genetic alterations and leads to the development of more aggressive bladder tumors, and the second, in which RT initiates the oncogenic process in otherwise healthy urothelium, leading to a longer latency and less aggressive disease

Overall Survival by Response to First-line Induction Treatment with Atezolizumab plus Platinum-based Chemotherapy or Placebo plus Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Standard-of-care first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is platinum-based chemotherapy (CTx). Maintenance immunotherapy is a treatment option for patients without progressive disease (PD) after induction CTx. IMvigor130 was a randomised, phase 3 study evaluating atezolizumab plus platinum-based CTx (arm A), atezolizumab monotherapy (arm B), or placebo plus platinum-based CTx (arm C) as first-line treatment for mUC. The primary progression-free survival (PFS) analysis showed a statistically significant PFS benefit favouring arm A versus arm C, which did not translate into overall survival (OS) benefit at the final OS analysis. We report exploratory analyses based on response to combination induction treatment (arm A vs arm C) using final OS data. Post-induction OS was analysed for patients without PD during induction (4-6 CTx cycles) who received at least one dose of single-agent atezolizumab/placebo maintenance treatment. Post-progression OS was analysed for patients with PD during induction CTx. Addition of atezolizumab to CTx did not impact OS outcomes, regardless of response to induction CTx, with hazard ratios of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.10) for patients without PD and 0.75 (95% CI 0.54-1.05) for those with PD during induction CTx. Treatment effects appeared to be greatest for patients treated with cisplatin and for those with PD-L1-high tumours. Patient summary: The IMvigor130 trial showed that addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy (CTx) did not improve survival over CTx alone in patients with bladder cancer. Overall, patients whose cancer did not progress during initial treatment tended to live longer than patients whose cancer did progress, but addition of atezolizumab to CTx did not help either group live longer in comparison to CTx alone. However, the results suggest that patients who received a certain CTx drug (cisplatin) or who had high levels of a marker called PD-L1 in their tumour may get the most improvement from addition of atezolizumab to CTx. The IMvigor130 trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02807636. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)