37 research outputs found

    Spiking memristor logic gates are a type of time-variant perceptron

    Full text link
    Memristors are low-power memory-holding resistors thought to be useful for neuromophic computing, which can compute via spike-interactions mediated through the device's short-term memory. Using interacting spikes, it is possible to build an AND gate that computes OR at the same time, similarly a full adder can be built that computes the arithmetical sum of its inputs. Here we show how these gates can be understood by modelling the memristors as a novel type of perceptron: one which is sensitive to input order. The memristor's memory can change the input weights for later inputs, and thus the memristor gates cannot be accurately described by a single perceptron, requiring either a network of time-invarient perceptrons or a complex time-varying self-reprogrammable perceptron. This work demonstrates the high functionality of memristor logic gates, and also that the addition of theasholding could enable the creation of a standard perceptron in hardware, which may have use in building neural net chips.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figures. Poster presentation at a conferenc

    My, and others', spiking memristors are true memristors: a response to R.S. Williams' question at the New Memory Paradigms: Memristive Phenomena and Neuromorphic Applications Faraday Discussion

    Get PDF
    At the Faraday Discussion, in the paper titled `Neuromorphic computation with spiking memristors: habituation, experimental instantiation of logic gates and a novel sequence-sensitive perceptron model' it was demonstrated that a large amount of computation could be done in a sequential way using memristor current spikes (d.c. response). As these spikes are found in many memristors (possibly all), this novel approach could be highly useful for fast and reproducible memristor circuits. However, questions were raised as to whether these spikes were actually due to memristance or merely capacitance in the circuit. In this longer version of the Faraday Discussion response, as much information as is available from both published and unpublished data from my lab is marshalled together. We find that the devices are likely imperfect memristors with some capacitance, and that the spikes are related to the frequency effect seen in memristor hysteresis curves, thus are an integral part of memristance.Comment: Long form of a Faraday Discussions commen

    When and where do feed-forward neural networks learn localist representations?

    Full text link
    According to parallel distributed processing (PDP) theory in psychology, neural networks (NN) learn distributed rather than interpretable localist representations. This view has been held so strongly that few researchers have analysed single units to determine if this assumption is correct. However, recent results from psychology, neuroscience and computer science have shown the occasional existence of local codes emerging in artificial and biological neural networks. In this paper, we undertake the first systematic survey of when local codes emerge in a feed-forward neural network, using generated input and output data with known qualities. We find that the number of local codes that emerge from a NN follows a well-defined distribution across the number of hidden layer neurons, with a peak determined by the size of input data, number of examples presented and the sparsity of input data. Using a 1-hot output code drastically decreases the number of local codes on the hidden layer. The number of emergent local codes increases with the percentage of dropout applied to the hidden layer, suggesting that the localist encoding may offer a resilience to noisy networks. This data suggests that localist coding can emerge from feed-forward PDP networks and suggests some of the conditions that may lead to interpretable localist representations in the cortex. The findings highlight how local codes should not be dismissed out of hand

    Are there any ‘object detectors’ in the hidden layers of CNNs trained to identify objects or scenes?

    Get PDF
    Various methods of measuring unit selectivity have been developed with the aim of better understanding how neural networks work. But the different measures provide divergent estimates of selectivity, and this has led to different conclusions regarding the conditions in which selective object representations are learned and the functional relevance of these representations. In an attempt to better characterize object selectivity, we undertake a comparison of various selectivity measures on a large set of units in AlexNet, including localist selectivity, precision, class-conditional mean activity selectivity (CCMAS), network dissection,the human interpretation of activation maximization (AM) images, and standard signal-detection measures. We find that the different measures provide different estimates of object selectivity, with precision and CCMAS measures providing misleadingly high estimates. Indeed, the most selective units had a poor hit-rate or a high false-alarm rate (or both) in object classification, making them poor object detectors. We fail to find any units that are even remotely as selective as the 'grandmother cell' units reported in recurrent neural networks. In order to generalize these results, we compared selectivity measures on units in VGG-16 and GoogLeNet trained on the ImageNet or Places-365 datasets that have been described as 'object detectors'. Again, we find poor hit-rates and high false-alarm rates for object classification. We conclude that signal-detection measures provide a better assessment of single-unit selectivity compared to common alternative approaches, and that deep convolutional networks of image classification do not learn object detectors in their hidden layers.Comment: Published in Vision Research 2020, 19 pages, 8 figure

    Interactivity:the missing link between virtual reality technology and drug discovery pipelines

    Get PDF
    The potential of virtual reality (VR) to contribute to drug design and development has been recognised for many years. Hardware and software developments now mean that this potential is beginning to be realised, and VR methods are being actively used in this sphere. A recent advance is to use VR not only to visualise and interact with molecular structures, but also to interact with molecular dynamics simulations of 'on the fly' (interactive molecular dynamics in VR, IMD-VR), which is useful not only for flexible docking but also to examine binding processes and conformational changes. iMD-VR has been shown to be useful for creating complexes of ligands bound to target proteins, e.g., recently applied to peptide inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. In this review, we use the term 'interactive VR' to refer to software where interactivity is an inherent part of the user VR experience e.g., in making structural modifications or interacting with a physically rigorous molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, as opposed to simply using VR controllers to rotate and translate the molecule for enhanced visualisation. Here, we describe these methods and their application to problems relevant to drug discovery, highlighting the possibilities that they offer in this arena. We suggest that the ease of viewing and manipulating molecular structures and dynamics, and the ability to modify structures on the fly (e.g., adding or deleting atoms) makes modern interactive VR a valuable tool to add to the armoury of drug development methods.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figure

    Subtle Sensing:Detecting Differences in the Flexibility of Virtually Simulated Molecular Objects

    Get PDF
    During VR demos we have performed over last few years, many participants (in the absence of any haptic feedback) have commented on their perceived ability to 'feel' differences between simulated molecular objects. The mechanisms for such 'feeling' are not entirely clear: observing from outside VR, one can see that there is nothing physical for participants to 'feel'. Here we outline exploratory user studies designed to evaluate the extent to which participants can distinguish quantitative differences in the flexibility of VR-simulated molecular objects. The results suggest that an individual's capacity to detect differences in molecular flexibility is enhanced when they can interact with and manipulate the molecules, as opposed to merely observing the same interaction. Building on these results, we intend to carry out further studies investigating humans' ability to sense quantitative properties of VR simulations without haptic technology

    Evolving spiking networks with variable resistive memories

    Get PDF
    Neuromorphic computing is a brainlike information processing paradigm that requires adaptive learning mechanisms. A spiking neuro-evolutionary system is used for this purpose; plastic resistive memories are implemented as synapses in spiking neural networks. The evolutionary design process exploits parameter self-adaptation and allows the topology and synaptic weights to be evolved for each network in an autonomous manner. Variable resistive memories are the focus of this research; each synapse has its own conductance profile which modifies the plastic behaviour of the device and may be altered during evolution. These variable resistive networks are evaluated on a noisy robotic dynamic-reward scenario against two static resistive memories and a system containing standard connections only. The results indicate that the extra behavioural degrees of freedom available to the networks incorporating variable resistive memories enable them to outperform the comparative synapse types. © 2014 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    corecore