Stress-induced lipocalin-2 controls dendritic spine formation and neuronal activity in the amygdala.

This is a freely-available open access publication. Please cite the published version which is available via the DOI link in this record.Behavioural adaptation to psychological stress is dependent on neuronal plasticity and dysfunction at this cellular level may underlie the pathogenesis of affective disorders such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Taking advantage of genome-wide microarray assay, we performed detailed studies of stress-affected transcripts in the amygdala - an area which forms part of the innate fear circuit in mammals. Having previously demonstrated the role of lipocalin-2 (Lcn-2) in promoting stress-induced changes in dendritic spine morphology/function and neuronal excitability in the mouse hippocampus, we show here that the Lcn-2 gene is one of the most highly upregulated transcripts detected by microarray analysis in the amygdala after acute restraint-induced psychological stress. This is associated with increased Lcn-2 protein synthesis, which is found on immunohistochemistry to be predominantly localised to neurons. Stress-naïve Lcn-2(-/-) mice show a higher spine density in the basolateral amygdala and a 2-fold higher rate of neuronal firing rate compared to wild-type mice. Unlike their wild-type counterparts, Lcn-2(-/-) mice did not show an increase in dendritic spine density in response to stress but did show a distinct pattern of spine morphology. Thus, amygdala-specific neuronal responses to Lcn-2 may represent a mechanism for behavioural adaptation to psychological stress.Marie Curie Excellence Grant from the European Commission.Medical Research Council Project GrantCOST Action ECMNe

Sentinel nodes outside lymph node basins in patients with melanoma

Background: Lymphoscintigraphy occasionally reveals hot spots outside lymph node basins in patients with melanoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate such abnormally located hot spots. Methods: Sentinel node biopsy was studied prospectively in 379 patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanoma. One day after lymphoscintigraphy, sentinel node biopsy was performed guided by vital blue dye and a gamma ray detection probe. Results: Persisting hot spots outside the regional node basins were seen in 25 patients (6.6 per cent). Several specific drainage patterns were discerned. In five patients, aberrant sentinel nodes were not explored. The hot spot represented a lymphangioma in two patients. Radioactive lymph nodes were identified in the remaining 18 patients (4.7 per cent). Four patients had metastasis in one of these aberrant lymph nodes. Conclusion: Sentinel nodes were found outside a lymph node basin in 5 per cent of patients. Particular drainage patterns exist. It is recommended to incorporate such sites in the late scintigraphy images and to pursue aberrant sentinel nodes, as they may be the only sites of metastasis

Treatment and prognostic significance of positive interval sentinel nodes in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Interval sentinel nodes (SNs) are lymph nodes receiving direct lymphatic drainage from a primary site and lying between the tumor and a recognized node field. It is not clear what further nodal surgery should be performed when interval nodes are found to contain micrometastatic disease. In this study, the incidence, location, and treatment of interval SNs in melanoma patients were analyzed to develop recommendations regarding the treatment of patients with interval SNs. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent lymphoscintigraphy at a single institution between 1992 and 2007. Data concerning the primary melanoma, location of SNs, treatment and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 4895 patients who had a lymphoscintigram during the study period, 442 (9.0%) had an interval SN identified on lymphoscintigraphy. Interval SNs occurred significantly more often in patients with melanomas on the posterior trunk than in those with melanomas at other sites (P < 0.001). A total of 197 patients (44.6%) with an identified interval SN underwent excision biopsy of the node. Of the 16 patients found to have metastatic melanoma in their interval SN, four also had negative SNs in a recognized lymph node field, and no other positive nodes were found on completion lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Interval SNs are present in approximately 1 in 10 melanoma patients but are about half as likely to contain metastases as SNs in recognized node fields. If a positive interval SN is found, completion lymphadenectomy of the recognized lymph node field is only recommended if a SN in this field is also positive