Edges between agriculture and forest viewed as interfaces between social and ecological systems

Edges between forest and agricultural areas are very common in rural landscapes where temperate forests are fragmented. From an ecological point of view, edges are most often defined as the boundary between two distinct habitats. Therefore, they have common characteristics with habitats they separate. Conversely, they can be considered as special ecological environments with their own characteristics and species. The edges are also characterized by the flow of organisms, matter, energy and information through them. By analogy with membranes, the structure of the vegetation in edges are more or less permeable ensuring a filter function. When the movements of organisms are parallel to the edge, they are recognized as a part of corridors. These interface effects, gradient and boundaries between spatial entities are important processes that were not as considered so far, as the effects of the surface, isolation or heterogeneity. However, forest and farm managers will need this information to adapt their managements in a context where the interactions between forests and agriculture will be more important, particularly through the valuation of ecosystem services, such as pollination and pest regulation. Moreover, changes in the landscape generally affect margins of habitats in the first place. These limits also often have a social significance that places them at the center of important management issues. From a socio-technical perspective, the edges turn out to be often used differently from the rest of the forest, including a higher frequency of cut. Interviews with managers show that their choices are the result of silvicultural decisions but also of the use of adjacent agricultural parcels for which edges can be an annoyance (for crops) or an asset (in the case of meadows for the shelter of animals). They are therefore important places of social interaction. Agricultural and forest environments can be seen as different ecological and social systems, characterized by a spatial structure of the biomass, a disturbance regime, management practices and different perceptions. In most cases, the edges also result from differential in the disturbance regime of vegetation, with a side with infrequent interventions, cuts in the forest, and on the other side more intensive and frequent interventions that hinder the development of trees for the benefit of crops. Theories of social and ecological systems and their dynamics, as panarchy, do not deal clearly with the phenomena that occur in the spatial limits of systems. At a finer spatial scale, edges may themselves be viewed as systems with their own characteristics, but the question of links with adjacent systems remains. The presentation describes these features of edges and the questions they pose, from practical examples drawn from several interdisciplinary works in landscape ecology, ethnology and geomatics. The possibilities of using the edges in an agro-ecological engineering of landscapes to enhance the ecosystem services they provide are exposed for discussion

Strength of forest edge effects on litter-dwelling macro-arthropods across Europe is influenced by forest age and edge properties

International audienceAim: Forests are highly fragmented across Western Europe, making forest edges im ‐portant features in many agricultural landscapes. Forest edges are subject to strong abiotic gradients altering the forest environment and resulting in strong biotic gradi ‐ents. This has the potential to change the forest's capacity to provide multiple eco ‐system services such as nutrient cycling, carbon sequestration and natural pest control. Soil organisms play a key role in this perspective; however, these taxa are rarely considered in forest edge research.Location: A latitudinal gradient of 2,000 km across Western Europe.Methods: We sampled six dominant taxa of litter‐dwelling macro‐arthropods (car ‐abid beetles, spiders, harvestmen, centipedes, millipedes and woodlice) in forest edges and interiors of 192 forest fragments in 12 agricultural landscapes. We related their abundance and community composition to distance from the edge and the inter ‐action with forest age, edge orientation and edge contrast (contrast between land use types at either side of the edge).Results: Three out of six macro‐arthropod taxa have higher activity‐density in forest edges compared to forest interiors. The abundance patterns along forest edge‐to‐in‐terior gradients interacted with forest age. Forest age and edge orientation also influ ‐enced within‐fragment compositional variation along the forest edge‐to‐interior gradient. Edge contrast influenced abundance gradients of generalist predators. In general, older forest fragments, south‐oriented edges and edges along structurally more continuous land use (lower contrast between forest and adjacent land use) re ‐sulted in stronger edge‐to‐interior gradients while recent forests, north‐oriented edges and sharp land use edges induced similarity between forest edge and interior along the forest edge‐to‐interior gradients in terms of species activity‐density and composition.Main conclusions: Edge effects on litter‐dwelling macro‐arthropods are anticipated to feedback on important ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling, carbon se ‐questration and natural pest control from small forest fragments

High ecosystem service delivery potential of small woodlands in agricultural landscapes

Global forest loss and fragmentation have strongly increased the frequency of forest patches smaller than a few hectares. Little is known about the biodiversity and ecosystem service supply potential of such small woodlands in comparison to larger forests. As it is widely recognized that high biodiversity levels increase ecosystem functionality and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services, small, isolated woodlands are expected to have a lower potential for ecosystem service delivery than large forests hosting more species. We collected data on the diversity of six taxonomic groups covering invertebrates, plants and fungi, and on the supply potential of five ecosystem services and one disservice within 224 woodlands distributed across temperate Europe. We related their ability to simultaneously provide multiple ecosystem services (multiservice delivery potential) at different performance levels to biodiversity of all studied taxonomic groups (multidiversity), forest patch size and age, as well as habitat availability and connectivity within the landscape, while accounting for macroclimate, soil properties and forest structure. Unexpectedly, despite their lower multidiversity, smaller woodlands had the potential to deliver multiple services at higher performance levels per area than larger woodlands of similar age, probably due to positive edge effects on the supply potential of several ecosystem services. Biodiversity only affected multiservice delivery potential at a low performance level as well as some individual ecosystem services. The importance of other drivers of ecosystem service supply potential by small woodlands in agricultural landscapes also depended on the level of performance and varied with the individual ecosystem service considered. Synthesis and applications. Large, ancient woodlands host high levels of biodiversity and can therefore deliver a number of ecosystem services. In contrast, smaller woodlands in agricultural landscapes, especially ancient woodlands, have a higher potential to deliver multiple ecosystem services on a per area basis. Despite their important contribution to agricultural landscape multifunctionality, small woodlands are not currently considered by public policies. There is thus an urgent need for targeted policy instruments to ensure their adequate management and future conservation in order to either achieve multiservice delivery at high levels or to maximize the delivery of specific ecosystem services

High ecosystem service delivery potential of small woodlands in agricultural landscapes

Global forest loss and fragmentation have strongly increased the frequency of forest patches smaller than a few hectares. Little is known about the biodiversity and ecosystem service supply potential of such small woodlands in comparison to larger forests. As it is widely recognized that high biodiversity levels increase ecosystem functionality and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services, small, isolated woodlands are expected to have a lower potential for ecosystem service delivery than large forests hosting more species. We collected data on the diversity of six taxonomic groups covering invertebrates, plants and fungi, and on the supply potential of five ecosystem services and one disservice within 224 woodlands distributed across temperate Europe. We related their ability to simultaneously provide multiple ecosystem services (multiservice delivery potential) at different performance levels to biodiversity of all studied taxonomic groups (multidiversity), forest patch size and age, as well as habitat availability and connectivity within the landscape, while accounting for macroclimate, soil properties and forest structure. Unexpectedly, despite their lower multidiversity, smaller woodlands had the potential to deliver multiple services at higher performance levels per area than larger woodlands of similar age, probably due to positive edge effects on the supply potential of several ecosystem services. Biodiversity only affected multiservice delivery potential at a low performance level as well as some individual ecosystem services. The importance of other drivers of ecosystem service supply potential by small woodlands in agricultural landscapes also depended on the level of performance and varied with the individual ecosystem service considered. Synthesis and applications. Large, ancient woodlands host high levels of biodiversity and can therefore deliver a number of ecosystem services. In contrast, smaller woodlands in agricultural landscapes, especially ancient woodlands, have a higher potential to deliver multiple ecosystem services on a per area basis. Despite their important contribution to agricultural landscape multifunctionality, small woodlands are not currently considered by public policies. There is thus an urgent need for targeted policy instruments to ensure their adequate management and future conservation in order to either achieve multiservice delivery at high levels or to maximize the delivery of specific ecosystem services

Influence des interactions biotiques complexes sur la régénération des essences forestières feuillues

Les herbivores consomment les tissus végétaux et affectent la survie et la croissance des végétaux. Les ennemis naturels des herbivores peuvent réguler leurs populations et indirectement diminuer les dommages sur la végétation. Les relations entre plantes, herbivores et prédateurs sont liées aux caractéristiques intrinsèques des espèces végétales mais aussi influencées par la communauté végétale environnante. L'hypothèse de résistance par association stipule qu'une communauté végétale diversifiée entraîne une diminution des dégâts sur une plante cible par dilution, répulsion des herbivores et/ou favorisation des ennemis naturels. Inversement, les herbivores peuvent se concentrer sur la plante-cible dans une communauté végétale diversifiée (susceptibilité par association). L'objectif de cette thèse est d'évaluer 1) l'influence de la composition de la communauté végétale sur les herbivores et leurs dommages sur une plante-cible, 2) l'impact de la régulation des herbivores par les prédateurs et 3) les interactions entre herbivores, communauté végétale et prédateurs, et les conséquences pour les intensités d'herbivorie sur la plante-cible. Nous nous sommes focalisés sur les dommages causés par les insectes herbivores sur des plantules d'essences forestières feuillues (Betula pendula, Quercus robur et Q. ilex). La variété importante de communautés végétales, au niveau inter (essences dominantes) et intraparcellaire (présence, structure et composition), nous a permis de tester les effets du voisinage végétal sur les insectes herbivores et leurs dommages sur les plantules cibles. Les oiseaux insectivores sont les principaux prédateurs d'insectes et nous avons cherché à estimer les effets de leur exclusion sur les insectes et les conséquences pour les plantules, et ceci le long des gradients de composition du voisinage végétal. Enfin, le degré de spécialisation (spécialiste/généraliste) et le mode de vie (exo/endophyte) ont été caractérisés car ils conditionnent les réponses des insectes herbivores à la végétation voisine ainsi que la prédation avienne. Le voisinage végétal des plantules-cibles modifie la charge en herbivores et les dommages engendrés. Ces réponses sont liées à la spécialisation de l'insecte herbivore : la colonisation des plantules par les espèces spécialistes (mineuses de feuilles) est négativement affectée par la structure de la végétation locale (présence, recouvrement arbustif). Les dommages d'insectes généralistes augmentent avec la richesse spécifique des peuplements et dans les parcelles dominées par des espèces conspécifiques. Les abondances des insectes externes et leurs dommages sont régulés par les oiseaux insectivores mais cet effet indirect dépend de l'espèce de plantule-cible et de la composition de la communauté végétale. Les effets de cascade trophique sont les plus intenses dans les parcelles de pin maritime où les plantules constituent une ressource nouvelle pour les niveaux trophiques supérieurs. Plus localement, le voisinage végétal modifie la sensibilité des arthropodes à la prédation: les oiseaux insectivores bénéficient aux plantules lorsque les proies sont plus accessibles (végétation environnante supprimée).Pour conclure, une des principales richesses de ces résultats vient de la mise en évidence d'interactions très fortes existant entre les effets des oiseaux insectivores et la végétation environnante. Les effets indirects des prédateurs et directs de la végétation environnante sont très liés au degré de spécialisation des insectes phytophages et à leur mode de vie.Herbivory is thought to depend on intrinsic plant resistance traits and negatively affect survival and growth of plants. Predators can depress herbivore populations and thereby indirectly limit the consumption of primary producers. The surrounding vegetation is also expected to modify the interactions between a focal plant, its herbivores and their natural enemies. The surrounding vegetation may disrupt the colonisation and the consumption of a focal plant by insect herbivores, providing associational resistance. Increasing diversity of neighbouring vegetation can decrease resource availability or enhance herbivores control by predators. By contrast, associational susceptibility may occur with higher levels of herbivory in a focal plant in more diverse plant communities. We tested 1) the effect of the neighbouring vegetation on the levels of herbivory on seedlings, 2) the indirect impact of predators on herbivores and subsequent herbivory, and 3) the interactions between surrounding vegetation, focal plants, herbivores and predators. We examined the damage caused by insect herbivores on three native broadleaved species. We then compared the importance of taxonomic similarity between seedlings and canopy tree species and the structure and composition of surrounding vegetation at both large- and small-scales. Birds are vertebrate predators likely to limit damage to plants and facilitate plant growth by consuming herbivorous insects. We estimated their effects by excluding them from focal plants, and compared their interactive effects with vegetation diversity or removal. The effects of surrounding vegetation and avian predation were also disentangled on concealed- vs. external-feeding guilds (predation sensitivity) and specialist- vs. generalist-insects.Surrounding vegetation of focal seedlings influences the abundance of insect herbivores and damage. Specialist insects (leaf miners) are affected by the understorey vegetation close to oak seedlings, decreasing with its presence or structural diversity. The damage caused by generalist insects depend on the large-scale composition of plant communities, and increase with tree species richness and cover or on conspecific forest habitats. Exclusion of insectivorous birds affects insect herbivory in a species-specific manner, and also greatly varies with forest habitats and presence of vegetation around focal plants. The indirect effect of bird predation on leaf damage is observed on seedlings beneath noncongeneric canopy trees. The removal of local surrounding vegetation affects the top-down effect of insectivorous birds on insect herbivores, according to their sensitivity to predation and the accessibility of preys. To conclude, our studies provide experimental evidences of interactive effects between bird predation and neighbouring vegetation on insect herbivores and levels of herbivory. These indirect effects are strongly related to the specialisation of herbivores and to their sensitivity to bird predation

Influence des interactions biotiques complexes sur la régénération des essences forestières feuillues

Les herbivores consomment les tissus végétaux et affectent la survie et la croissance des végétaux. Les ennemis naturels des herbivores peuvent réguler leurs populations et indirectement diminuer les dommages sur la végétation. Les relations entre plantes, herbivores et prédateurs sont liées aux caractéristiques intrinsèques des espèces végétales mais aussi influencées par la communauté végétale environnante. L'hypothèse de résistance par association stipule qu'une communauté végétale diversifiée entraîne une diminution des dégâts sur une plante cible par dilution, répulsion des herbivores et/ou favorisation des ennemis naturels. Inversement, les herbivores peuvent se concentrer sur la plante-cible dans une communauté végétale diversifiée (susceptibilité par association). L'objectif de cette thèse est d'évaluer 1) l'influence de la composition de la communauté végétale sur les herbivores et leurs dommages sur une plante-cible, 2) l'impact de la régulation des herbivores par les prédateurs et 3) les interactions entre herbivores, communauté végétale et prédateurs, et les conséquences pour les intensités d'herbivorie sur la plante-cible. Nous nous sommes focalisés sur les dommages causés par les insectes herbivores sur des plantules d'essences forestières feuillues (Betula pendula, Quercus robur et Q. ilex). La variété importante de communautés végétales, au niveau inter (essences dominantes) et intraparcellaire (présence, structure et composition), nous a permis de tester les effets du voisinage végétal sur les insectes herbivores et leurs dommages sur les plantules cibles. Les oiseaux insectivores sont les principaux prédateurs d'insectes et nous avons cherché à estimer les effets de leur exclusion sur les insectes et les conséquences pour les plantules, et ceci le long des gradients de composition du voisinage végétal. Enfin, le degré de spécialisation (spécialiste/généraliste) et le mode de vie (exo/endophyte) ont été caractérisés car ils conditionnent les réponses des insectes herbivores à la végétation voisine ainsi que la prédation avienne. Le voisinage végétal des plantules-cibles modifie la charge en herbivores et les dommages engendrés. Ces réponses sont liées à la spécialisation de l'insecte herbivore : la colonisation des plantules par les espèces spécialistes (mineuses de feuilles) est négativement affectée par la structure de la végétation locale (présence, recouvrement arbustif). Les dommages d'insectes généralistes augmentent avec la richesse spécifique des peuplements et dans les parcelles dominées par des espèces conspécifiques. Les abondances des insectes externes et leurs dommages sont régulés par les oiseaux insectivores mais cet effet indirect dépend de l'espèce de plantule-cible et de la composition de la communauté végétale. Les effets de cascade trophique sont les plus intenses dans les parcelles de pin maritime où les plantules constituent une ressource nouvelle pour les niveaux trophiques supérieurs. Plus localement, le voisinage végétal modifie la sensibilité des arthropodes à la prédation: les oiseaux insectivores bénéficient aux plantules lorsque les proies sont plus accessibles (végétation environnante supprimée).Pour conclure, une des principales richesses de ces résultats vient de la mise en évidence d'interactions très fortes existant entre les effets des oiseaux insectivores et la végétation environnante. Les effets indirects des prédateurs et directs de la végétation environnante sont très liés au degré de spécialisation des insectes phytophages et à leur mode de vie.Herbivory is thought to depend on intrinsic plant resistance traits and negatively affect survival and growth of plants. Predators can depress herbivore populations and thereby indirectly limit the consumption of primary producers. The surrounding vegetation is also expected to modify the interactions between a focal plant, its herbivores and their natural enemies. The surrounding vegetation may disrupt the colonisation and the consumption of a focal plant by insect herbivores, providing associational resistance. Increasing diversity of neighbouring vegetation can decrease resource availability or enhance herbivores control by predators. By contrast, associational susceptibility may occur with higher levels of herbivory in a focal plant in more diverse plant communities. We tested 1) the effect of the neighbouring vegetation on the levels of herbivory on seedlings, 2) the indirect impact of predators on herbivores and subsequent herbivory, and 3) the interactions between surrounding vegetation, focal plants, herbivores and predators. We examined the damage caused by insect herbivores on three native broadleaved species. We then compared the importance of taxonomic similarity between seedlings and canopy tree species and the structure and composition of surrounding vegetation at both large- and small-scales. Birds are vertebrate predators likely to limit damage to plants and facilitate plant growth by consuming herbivorous insects. We estimated their effects by excluding them from focal plants, and compared their interactive effects with vegetation diversity or removal. The effects of surrounding vegetation and avian predation were also disentangled on concealed- vs. external-feeding guilds (predation sensitivity) and specialist- vs. generalist-insects.Surrounding vegetation of focal seedlings influences the abundance of insect herbivores and damage. Specialist insects (leaf miners) are affected by the understorey vegetation close to oak seedlings, decreasing with its presence or structural diversity. The damage caused by generalist insects depend on the large-scale composition of plant communities, and increase with tree species richness and cover or on conspecific forest habitats. Exclusion of insectivorous birds affects insect herbivory in a species-specific manner, and also greatly varies with forest habitats and presence of vegetation around focal plants. The indirect effect of bird predation on leaf damage is observed on seedlings beneath noncongeneric canopy trees. The removal of local surrounding vegetation affects the top-down effect of insectivorous birds on insect herbivores, according to their sensitivity to predation and the accessibility of preys. To conclude, our studies provide experimental evidences of interactive effects between bird predation and neighbouring vegetation on insect herbivores and levels of herbivory. These indirect effects are strongly related to the specialisation of herbivores and to their sensitivity to bird predation