2015 ACVIM Small Animal Consensus Statement on Seizure Management in Dogs

This report represents a scientific and working clinical consensus statement on seizure management in dogs based on current literature and clinical expertise. The goal was to establish guidelines for a predetermined, concise, and logical sequential approach to chronic seizure management starting with seizure identification and diagnosis (not included in this report), reviewing decision‐making, treatment strategies, focusing on issues related to chronic antiepileptic drug treatment response and monitoring, and guidelines to enhance patient response and quality of life. Ultimately, we hope to provide a foundation for ongoing and future clinical epilepsy research in veterinary medicine

International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force consensus proposal: Medical treatment of canine epilepsy in Europe

In Europe, the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed for dogs has grown considerably over the last years. Nevertheless, the same questions remain, which include, 1) when to start treatment, 2) which drug is best used initially, 3) which adjunctive AED can be advised if treatment with the initial drug is unsatisfactory, and 4) when treatment changes should be considered. In this consensus proposal, an overview is given on the aim of AED treatment, when to start long-term treatment in canine epilepsy and which veterinary AEDs are currently in use for dogs. The consensus proposal for drug treatment protocols, 1) is based on current published evidence-based literature, 2) considers the current legal framework of the cascade regulation for the prescription of veterinary drugs in Europe, and 3) reflects the authors’ experience. With this paper it is aimed to provide a consensus for the management of canine idiopathic epilepsy. Furthermore, for the management of structural epilepsy AEDs are inevitable in addition to treating the underlying cause, if possible

Stigma Diversity in Tropical Legumes with Considerations on Stigma Classification

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)The great stigma diversity in angiosperms implies a choice of criteria for stigma classification, which nowadays is characterized as dry (= little or no secretory surface and exudate retained by the cuticle and/or protein pellicle), wet (= conspicuous secretory surface, abundant in fluid exudate) and semidry (exudate retained by cuticle and/or protein pellicle). Despite being a very species-rich family, whose representatives exhibit a wide floral variation, no comparative studies of stigma diversity have been done for the whole Leguminosae. In order to assess the stigma morphological diversity in legumes and to evaluate the criteria used in the main classifications of the stigma, we compared the stigma morphology in 15 distinct legume lineages. In addition, we evaluated the stigma classification in other 152 legume species whose morphology was already described in the literature. Stigmas were removed from floral buds and flowers and processed for analyses under scanning electron and light microscopes. The stigma of the study legumes exhibits quite variable morphology, mainly concerning the diameter, the occurrence of an orifice or a furrow, the coating, the cellular composition, and the occurrence, chemical nature and release mechanism of the exudate. This diversity appears to be related mainly to the evolutionary history of the group and also to the selective pressures exerted by different types of pollen and pollinator. More conflicting criteria for stigma classification lie in defining the semidry type, found mostly in papilionoids. For better stigma classification we suggest that stigma morphology be evaluated at the time prior to anthesis, when the cuticle is not yet broken and the exudate is not exposed or drained. In addition, several techniques should be employed for a better classification.801129Fundacao de Amparao a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2002/11834-5, 2008/57487-0, 2009/01057-0]Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundacao de Amparao a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2002/11834-5, 2008/57487-0, 2009/01057-0]CNPq [142876/2008-9, 301960/2009-7, 152759/2010-7