Emerging Concepts for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: What is Cure?

The objective of this review is to discuss emerging concepts in pelvic organ prolapse, in particular, “What is cure?” In a post-trial data analysis of the CARE (Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts) trial, treatment success varied tremendously depending on the definition used (19.2%–97.2%). Definitions that included the absence of vaginal bulge symptoms had the strongest relationships with the patients’ assessment of overall improvement and treatment success. As demonstrated by this study, there are several challenges in defining cure in prolapse surgery. Additionally, the symptoms of prolapse are variable. The degree of prolapse does not correlate directly with symptoms. There are many surgical approaches to pelvic organ prolapse. Multiple ways to quantify prolapse are used. There is a lack of standardized definition of cure. The data on prolapse surgery outcomes are heterogeneous. The goal of surgical repair is to return the pelvic organs to their original anatomic positions. Ideally, we have four main goals: no anatomic prolapse, no functional symptoms, patient satisfaction, and the avoidance of complications. The impact of transvaginal mesh requires thoughtful investigation. The driving force should be patient symptoms in defining cure of prolapse

Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh

Contains fulltext : 96379.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to evaluate the complications and anatomical and functional outcomes of the surgical treatment of mesh-related complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent complete or partial mesh excision to treat complications after prior mesh-augmented pelvic floor reconstructive surgery was conducted. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients underwent 30 complete and 51 partial mesh excisions. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4 cases, postoperative complications in 13. Symptom relief was achieved in 92% of patients. Recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurred in 29% of complete and 5% of partial excisions of mesh used in POP surgery. De novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurred in 36% of patients who underwent excision of a suburethral sling. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh excision relieves mesh-related complications effectively, although with a substantial risk of serious complications and recurrence of POP or SUI. More complex excisions should be performed in skilled centers

Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy

The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for mesh erosion in women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC). We hypothesize that erosion is higher in subjects undergoing concomitant hysterectomy. This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent MISC between November 2004 and January 2009. Demographics, operative techniques, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Multivariable regression identified odds of erosion. Of 188 MISC procedures 19(10%) had erosions. Erosion was higher in those with total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) compared to both post-hysterectomy (23% vs. 5%, p = 0.003) and supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) (23% vs. 5%, p = 0.109) groups. In multivariable regression, the odds of erosion for TVH was 5.67 (95% CI: 1.88–17.10) compared to post-hysterectomy. Smoking, the use of collagen-coated mesh, transvaginal dissection, and mesh attachment transvaginally were no longer significant in the multivariable regression model. Based on this study, surgeons should consider supracervical hysterectomy over total vaginal hysterectomy as the procedure of choice in association with MISC unless removal of the cervix is otherwise indicated

Outcome measures to assess anatomy and function of the posterior vaginal compartment.

Introduction and hypothesisOptimal measures for assessing anatomy and defecatory symptoms related to posterior compartment prolapse are unknown. Our objectives were: (1) to test the inter- and intrarater reliability of commonly used or reported anatomic measures of posterior compartment prolapse performed in the clinic setting and under anesthesia; and (2) to examine the correlation between posterior compartment anatomy and defecatory symptoms prior to surgical intervention.MethodsA prospective cohort of women with pelvic floor disorders was assessed using a variety of validated questionnaires and standardized examination measures at baseline, at a preoperative visit, and intraoperatively. Inter- and intrarater reliability for anatomic measures were assessed by two separate examiners at the initial visit and repeated by one of the original examiners at a preoperative visit. Reliability was measured using kappa or intraclass correlations according to data type. Symptom and anatomic measure correlations were analyzed using Spearman rank tests.ResultsMean age of the 120 women recruited was 57 ± 15 years, 49 (41 %) had a point Bp ≥ 0; 59 % reported at least moderate bother from at least one obstructed defecation symptom on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI). At baseline, most anatomic measures showed at least moderate to good inter/intrarater reliability (> 0.5). There were no moderate or better correlations between any symptom and anatomic measure (all r <  0.27).ConclusionsMost anatomic measures of posterior compartment prolapse are reliable and reproducible; however, they do not correlate well with defecatory symptoms

Outcome measures to assess anatomy and function of the posterior vaginal compartment.

Introduction and hypothesisOptimal measures for assessing anatomy and defecatory symptoms related to posterior compartment prolapse are unknown. Our objectives were: (1) to test the inter- and intrarater reliability of commonly used or reported anatomic measures of posterior compartment prolapse performed in the clinic setting and under anesthesia; and (2) to examine the correlation between posterior compartment anatomy and defecatory symptoms prior to surgical intervention.MethodsA prospective cohort of women with pelvic floor disorders was assessed using a variety of validated questionnaires and standardized examination measures at baseline, at a preoperative visit, and intraoperatively. Inter- and intrarater reliability for anatomic measures were assessed by two separate examiners at the initial visit and repeated by one of the original examiners at a preoperative visit. Reliability was measured using kappa or intraclass correlations according to data type. Symptom and anatomic measure correlations were analyzed using Spearman rank tests.ResultsMean age of the 120 women recruited was 57 ± 15 years, 49 (41 %) had a point Bp ≥ 0; 59 % reported at least moderate bother from at least one obstructed defecation symptom on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI). At baseline, most anatomic measures showed at least moderate to good inter/intrarater reliability (> 0.5). There were no moderate or better correlations between any symptom and anatomic measure (all r <  0.27).ConclusionsMost anatomic measures of posterior compartment prolapse are reliable and reproducible; however, they do not correlate well with defecatory symptoms

Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse : a population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patient perceptions of results including sexual activity, urinary symptoms, and provided care

Background: Vaginal hysterectomy is often used to correct uterovaginal prolapse, however, there is little information regarding outcomes after surgery in routine clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate complications, sexual activity, urinary symptoms, and satisfaction with health care after vaginal hysterectomy due to prolapse. Methods: We analyzed data from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery (SNRGS) from January 1997 to August 2005. Women participating in the SNRGS were asked to complete surveys at two and six months postoperatively. Of 941 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse, 791 responded to questionnaires at two months and 682 at six months. Complications during surgery and hospital stay were investigated. The two-month questionnaire investigated complications after discharge, and patients’ satisfaction with their health care. Sexual activity and urinary symptoms were reported and compared in preoperative and six-month postoperative questionnaires. Results: Almost 60 % of women reported normal activity of daily life (ADL) within one week of surgery, irrespective of their age. Severe complications occurred in 3 % and were mainly intra-abdominal bleeding and vaginal vault hematomas. Six months postoperative, sexual activity had increased for 20 % (p=0.006) of women and urinary urgency was reduced for 50 % (p=0.001); however, 14 % (n=76) of women developed urinary incontinence, 76% (n=58) of whom reported urinary stress incontinence. Patients were satisfied with the postoperative result in 93 % of cases and 94 % recommended the surgery. Conclusion: Vaginal hysterectomy is a patient-evaluated efficient treatment for uterovaginal prolapse with swift recovery and a low rate of complication. Sexual activity and symptoms of urinary urgency were improved. However, 14 % developed incontinence, mainly urinary stress incontinence (11 %). Therefore efforts to disclose latent stress incontinence should be undertaken preoperativel