46 research outputs found

    The SARS-Unique Domain (SUD) of SARS Coronavirus Contains Two Macrodomains That Bind G-Quadruplexes

    Get PDF
    Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003, the three-dimensional structures of several of the replicase/transcriptase components of SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the non-structural proteins (Nsps), have been determined. However, within the large Nsp3 (1922 amino-acid residues), the structure and function of the so-called SARS-unique domain (SUD) have remained elusive. SUD occurs only in SARS-CoV and the highly related viruses found in certain bats, but is absent from all other coronaviruses. Therefore, it has been speculated that it may be involved in the extreme pathogenicity of SARS-CoV, compared to other coronaviruses, most of which cause only mild infections in humans. In order to help elucidate the function of the SUD, we have determined crystal structures of fragment 389–652 (“SUDcore”) of Nsp3, which comprises 264 of the 338 residues of the domain. Both the monoclinic and triclinic crystal forms (2.2 and 2.8 Å resolution, respectively) revealed that SUDcore forms a homodimer. Each monomer consists of two subdomains, SUD-N and SUD-M, with a macrodomain fold similar to the SARS-CoV X-domain. However, in contrast to the latter, SUD fails to bind ADP-ribose, as determined by zone-interference gel electrophoresis. Instead, the entire SUDcore as well as its individual subdomains interact with oligonucleotides known to form G-quadruplexes. This includes oligodeoxy- as well as oligoribonucleotides. Mutations of selected lysine residues on the surface of the SUD-N subdomain lead to reduction of G-quadruplex binding, whereas mutations in the SUD-M subdomain abolish it. As there is no evidence for Nsp3 entering the nucleus of the host cell, the SARS-CoV genomic RNA or host-cell mRNA containing long G-stretches may be targets of SUD. The SARS-CoV genome is devoid of G-stretches longer than 5–6 nucleotides, but more extended G-stretches are found in the 3′-nontranslated regions of mRNAs coding for certain host-cell proteins involved in apoptosis or signal transduction, and have been shown to bind to SUD in vitro. Therefore, SUD may be involved in controlling the host cell's response to the viral infection. Possible interference with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-like domains is also discussed

    Refined 3.2 Å structure of glycosomal holo glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase from Trypanosoma brucei brucei

    No full text
    The three-dimensional crystal structure of the enzyme glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase from the kinetoplastid Trypanosoma brucei brucei has been determined at 3.2 Angstrom resolution from a 37% complete data set collected using the Laue method. The crystals used in the structure determination contain one and a half tetrameric enzyme molecules in the asymmetric unit, i.e. six identical subunits. Initial phasing was carried out by the method of molecular replacement using the refined coordinates of hole glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus as a search model. The initial electron-density distribution, obtained from the molecular-replacement solution, was greatly improved by a procedure consisting of 36 cycles of iterative non-crystallographic density averaging. During the averaging procedure, the missing reflections (63% of the data) were gradually introduced as map-inversion structure factors. At completion of the procedure, the R factor between averaged map-inversion amplitudes and observed structure-factor amplitudes was 19.0% for all data between 7.0 and 3.2 Angstrom resolution, and that between the map-inversion amplitudes and later recorded structure-factor amplitudes was 41.9%. After model building into the resulting averaged electron-density map, refinement by molecular-dynamics procedures with X-PLOR provided the current model, which has an R factor of 17.6% for 34 835 reflections between 7.0 and 3.2 Angstrom resolution. The refined model, comprising 2735 protein atoms plus one NAD(+) molecule and two sulfate ions per subunit, has r.ms. deviations from ideality of 0.02 Angstrom for bond lengths and 3.6 degrees for bond angles. All subunits, located either within the tetrameric molecule or within the half tetramer present in the asymmetric unit, are related to each other by almost exact twofold symmetry. The overall structure of the glycosomal glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase subunit and its quaternary arrangement in the tetrameric molecule are similar to that of the enzyme of lobster and Bacillus stearothermophilus (with r.m.s. differences between equivalent C alpha positions of 0.71 and 0.64 Angstrom, respectively). The main differences between the structures is the presence of three insertions, plus the substitution of a beta-strand by a short alpha-helix, both occurring at the surface of the glycosomal enzyme subunit

    Structure determination of quinoprotein methylamine de­hydrogenase from Thiobacillus versutus

    No full text
    The crystal structure of quinoprotein methylamine dehydrogenase from Thiobacillus versutus (EC 1.4.99.3, M(r) = 123 500) has been solved to 2.25-angstrom resolution. The crystals of space group P3(1)21 (a = b = 129.8, c = 104.3-angstrom) contain half a tetrameric enzyme molecule in the asymmetric unit, with a solvent content of ca 70%. The procedure used to solve this structure involved multiple isomorphous-replacement phasing, complemented by phase extension using solvent flattening, and phase combination with partial-model phases. The use of solvent flattening was essential to generate good quality electron density maps into which initial models were built. These partial models were refined using molecular-dynamics procedures. Refined model phases were then combined with solvent-flattening phases to generate improved electron density distributions. In the absence of an amino-acid sequence for this enzyme, the current 2.25-angstrom resolution electron density map was interpreted to provide a model for the complete molecule. The crystallographic R factor for this model, which lacks any water molecules, is 28.6% for data between 6.0 and 2.25-angstrom resolution

    Crystal structure of recombinant triosephosphate isomerase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. An analysis of potential thermostability factors in six isomerases with known three-dimensional structures points to the importance of hydrophobic interactions

    Full text link
    peer reviewedThe structure of the thermostable triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) from Bacillus stearothermophilus complexed with the competitive inhibitor 2-phosphoglycolate was determined by X-ray crystallography to a resolution of 2.8 A. The structure was solved by molecular replacement using XPLOR. Twofold averaging and solvent flattening was applied to improve the quality of the map. Active sites in both the subunits are occupied by the inhibitor and the flexible loop adopts the "closed" conformation in either subunit. The crystallographic R-factor is 17.6% with good geometry. The two subunits have an RMS deviation of 0.29 A for 248 C alpha atoms and have average temperature factors of 18.9 and 15.9 A2, respectively. In both subunits, the active site Lys 10 adopts an unusual phi, psi combination. A comparison between the six known thermophilic and mesophilic TIM structures was conducted in order to understand the higher stability of B. stearothermophilus TIM. Although the ratio Arg/(Arg+Lys) is higher in B. stearothermophilus TIM, the structure comparisons do not directly correlate this higher ratio to the better stability of the B. stearothermophilus enzyme. A higher number of prolines contributes to the higher stability of B. stearothermophilus TIM. Analysis of the known TIM sequences points out that the replacement of a structurally crucial asparagine by a histidine at the interface of monomers, thus avoiding the risk of deamidation and thereby introducing a negative charge at the interface, may be one of the factors for adaptability at higher temperatures in the TIM family. Analysis of buried cavities and the areas lining these cavities also contributes to the greater thermal stability of the B. stearothermophilus enzyme. However, the most outstanding result of the structure comparisons appears to point to the hydrophobic stabilization of dimer formation by burying the largest amount of hydrophobic surface area in B. stearothermophilus TIM compared to all five other known TIM structures

    Structure of quinoprotein methylamine dehydrogenase at 2.25 A resolution.

    No full text
    The three-dimensional structure of quinoprotein methylamine dehydrogenase from Thiobacillus versutus has been determined at 2.25 A resolution by a combination of multiple isomorphous replacement, phase extension by solvent flattening and partial structure phasing using molecular dynamics refinement. In the resulting map, the polypeptide chain for both subunits could be followed and an X-ray sequence was established. The tetrameric enzyme, made up of two heavy (H) and two light (L) subunits, is a flat parallellepiped with overall dimensions of approximately 76 x 61 x 45 A. The H subunit, comprising 370 residues, is made up of two distinct segments: the first 31 residues form an extension which embraces one of the L subunits; the remaining residues are found in a disc-shaped domain. This domain is formed by a circular arrangement of seven topologically identical four-stranded antiparallel beta-sheets, with approximately 7-fold symmetry. In spite of distinct differences, this arrangement is reminiscent of the structure found in influenza virus neuraminidase. The L subunit consists of 121 residues, out of which 53 form a beta-sheet scaffold of a central three-stranded antiparallel sheet flanked by two shorter two-stranded antiparallel sheets. The remaining residues are found in segments of irregular structure. This subunit is stabilized by six disulphide bridges, plus two covalent bridges involving the quinone co-factor and residues 57 and 107 of this subunit. The active site is located in a channel at the interface region between the H and L subunits, and the electron density in this part of the molecule suggests that the co-factor of this enzyme is not pyrrolo quinoline quinone (PQQ) itself, but might be instead a precursor of PQQ
    corecore