42 research outputs found
Hypotheses and their dynamics in legal argumentation
We investigate some legal interpretation techniques from the viewpoint of the Argentinian jurisprudence. This allows the proposal of a logical framework âfrom a computer science perspectiveâ for modeling such specific reasoning techniques towards an appropriate construction of legal arguments. Afterwards, we study the usage of assumptions towards construction of hypotheses. This is proposed in the dynamic context of legal procedures, where the referred argumentation framework evolves as part of the investigation instance prior to the trial. We propose belief revision operators to handle such dynamics, preserving a coherent behavior with regards to the legal interpretation used. Abduction is finally proposed to construct systematic hypothesization, with the objective to bring semi-automatic recommendations to push forward the investigation of a legal case
Determinants of Corporate Exchange Rate Exposure and Implications for Investors: Evidence from Chilean Firms
ReestructuraciĂłn del sector agrario en Chile 1975-2010: entre el proteccionismo del Estado y el modelo econĂłmico neoliberal
Change in Argumentation Systems: Exploring the Interest of Removing an Argument
International audienc