Net neutrality discourses: comparing advocacy and regulatory arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom

Telecommunications policy issues rarely make news, much less mobilize thousands of people. Yet this has been occurring in the United States around efforts to introduce "Net neutrality" regulation. A similar grassroots mobilization has not developed in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in Europe. We develop a comparative analysis of U.S. and UK Net neutrality debates with an eye toward identifying the arguments for and against regulation, how those arguments differ between the countries, and what the implications of those differences are for the Internet. Drawing on mass media, advocacy, and regulatory discourses, we find that local regulatory precedents as well as cultural factors contribute to both agenda setting and framing of Net neutrality. The differences between national discourses provide a way to understand both the structural differences between regulatory cultures and the substantive differences between policy interpretations, both of which must be reconciled for the Internet to continue to thrive as a global medium

Net neutrality discourses: comparing advocacy and regulatory arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom

Telecommunications policy issues rarely make news, much less mobilize thousands of people. Yet this has been occurring in the United States around efforts to introduce "Net neutrality" regulation. A similar grassroots mobilization has not developed in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in Europe. We develop a comparative analysis of U.S. and UK Net neutrality debates with an eye toward identifying the arguments for and against regulation, how those arguments differ between the countries, and what the implications of those differences are for the Internet. Drawing on mass media, advocacy, and regulatory discourses, we find that local regulatory precedents as well as cultural factors contribute to both agenda setting and framing of Net neutrality. The differences between national discourses provide a way to understand both the structural differences between regulatory cultures and the substantive differences between policy interpretations, both of which must be reconciled for the Internet to continue to thrive as a global medium

Nanorings and rods interconnected by self-assembly mimicking an artificial network of neurons

[EN] Molecular electronics based on structures ordered as neural networks emerges as the next evolutionary milestone in the construction of nanodevices with unprecedented applications. However, the straightforward formation of geometrically defined and interconnected nanostructures is crucial for the production of electronic circuitry nanoequivalents. Here we report on the molecularly fine-tuned self-assembly of tetrakis-Schiff base compounds into nanosized rings interconnected by unusually large nanorods providing a set of connections that mimic a biological network of neurons. The networks are produced through self-assembly resulting from the molecular conformation and noncovalent intermolecular interactions. These features can be easily generated on flat surfaces and in a polymeric matrix by casting from solution under ambient conditions. The structures can be used to guide the position of electron-transporting agents such as carbon nanotubes on a surface or in a polymer matrix to create electrically conducting networks that can find direct use in constructing nanoelectronic circuits.The research leading to these results has received funding from ICIQ, ICREA, the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) through project CTQ2011-27385 and the European Community Seventh Framework Program (FP7-PEOPLE-ITN-2008, CONTACT consortium) under grant agreement number 238363. We acknowledge E. C. Escudero-Adan, M. Martinez-Belmonte and E. Martin from the X-ray department of ICIQ for crystallographic analysis, and M. Moncusi, N. Argany, R. Marimon, M. Stefanova and L. Vojkuvka from the Servei de Recursos Cientifics i Tecnics from Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Tarragona, Spain).Escarcega-Bobadilla, MV.; Zelada-Guillen, GA.; Pyrlin, SV.; Wegrzyn, M.; Ramos, MMD.; Giménez Torres, E.; Stewart, A.... (2013). Nanorings and rods interconnected by self-assembly mimicking an artificial network of neurons. Nature Communications. 4:2648-2648. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3648S264826484Champness, N. R. Making the right connections. Nat. Chem. 4, 149–150 (2012).Hopfield, J. J. & Tank, D. W. Computing with neural circuits: A model. Science 233, 625–633 (1986).Andres, P. R. et al. Self-assembly of a two-dimensional superlattice of molecularly linked metal clusters. Science 273, 1690–1693 (1996).Eichen, Y., Braun, E., Sivan, U. & Ben-Yoseph, G. Self-assembly of nanoelectronic components and circuits using biological templates. Acta Polym. 49, 663–670 (1998).Kawakami, T. et al. Possibilities of molecule-based spintronics of DNA wires, sheets, and related materials. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 105, 655–671 (2005).Kashtan, N., Itzkovitz, S., Milo, R. & Alon, U. Topological generalizations of network motifs. Phys. Rev. E 70, 031909 (2004).Grill, L. et al. Nano-architectures by covalent assembly of molecular building blocks. Nat. Nanotech. 2, 687–691 (2007).Lafferentz, L. et al. Controlling on-surface polymerization by hierarchical and substrate-directed growth. Nat. Chem. 4, 215–220 (2012).Alivisatos, A. P. et al. From molecules to materials: current trends and future directions. Adv. Mater. 10, 1297–1336 (1998).Pauling, L. The principles determining the structure of complex ionic crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, 1010–1026 (1929).Damasceno, P. F., Engel, M. & Glotzer, S. C. Predictive self-assembly of polyhedra into complex structures. Science 337, 453–457 (2012).De Graaf, J. & Manna, L. A roadmap for the assembly of polyhedral particles. Science 337, 417–418 (2012).Percec, V. et al. Controlling polymer shape through the self-assembly of dendritic side-groups. Nature 391, 161–164 (1998).Stupp, S. I. et al. Supramolecular materials: self-organized nanostructures. Science 276, 384–389 (1997).Mann, S. The chemistry of form. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 3392–3406 (2000).Sakakibara, K., Hill, J. P. & Ariga, K. Thin-film-based nanoarchitectures for soft matter: controlled assemblies into two-dimensional worlds. Small 7, 1288–1308 (2011).Huang, Z. et al. Pulsating tubules from noncovalent macrocycles. Science 337, 1521–1526 (2012).Ackermann, D., Jester, S.-S. & Famulok, M. Design strategy for DNA rotaxanes with a mechanically reinforced PX100 axle. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 27, 6771–6775 (2012).Marx, J. L. Microtubules: versatile organelles. Science 181, 1236–1237 (1973).Heus, H. A. & Pardi, A. Structural features that give rise to the unusual stability of RNA hairpins containing GNRA loops. Science 253, 191–194 (1991).Braun, E., Eichen, Y., Sivan, U. & Ben-Yoseph, G. DNA-templated assembly and electrode attachment of a conducting silver wire. Nature 391, 775–778 (1998).Zhang, S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1171–1178 (2003).Cai, X. et al. Integrated compact optical vortex beam emitters. Science 338, 363–365 (2012).Clark, A. W. & Cooper, J. M. Nanogap ring antennae as plasmonically coupled SERRS substrates. Small 7, 119–125 (2011).Armani, A. M., Kulkarni, R. P., Fraser, S. E., Flagan, R. C. & Vahala, K. J. Label-free, single-molecule detection with optical microcavities. Science 317, 783–787 (2007).Frischmann, P. D., Guieu, S., Tabeshi, R. & MacLachlan, M. J. Columnar organization of head-to-tail self-assembled Pt4 rings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7668–7675 (2010).Frischmann, P. D. et al. Capsule formation, carboxylate exchange, and DFT exploration of cadmium cluster metallocavitands: highly dynamic supramolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3893–3908 (2010).Akine, S., Hotate, S. & Nabeshima, T. A molecular leverage for helicity control and helix Inversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 13868–13871 (2011).Salassa, G. et al. Extremely strong self-assembly of a bimetallic salen complex visualized at the single-molecule level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7186–7192 (2012).Escárcega-Bobadilla, M. V., Salassa, G., Martínez Belmonte, M., Escudero-Adán, E. C. & Kleij, A. W. Versatile switching in substrate topicity: supramolecular chirality induction in di- and trinuclear host complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 6805–6810 (2012).Frischmann, P. D., Jiang, J., Hui, J. K.-H., Grzybowski, J. J. & MacLachlan, M. J. Reversible—irreversible approach to Schiff base macrocycles. Access to isomeric macrocycles with multiple salphen pockets. Org. Lett. 10, 1255–1258 (2008).Glaser, T. Rational design of single-molecule magnets: a supramolecular approach. Chem. Commun. 47, 116–130 (2011).Lee, E. C. et al. Understanding of assembly phenomena by aromatic−aromatic interactions: benzene dimer and the substituted systems. J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 3446–3457 (2007).Grybowski, B. A., Wilmer, C. E., Kim, J., Browne, K. P. & Bishop, K. J. M. Self-assembly: from crystals to cells. Soft Matter. 5, 1110–1128 (2009).Martínez Belmonte, M. et al. Self-assembly of Zn(salphen) complexes: steric regulation, stability studies and crystallographic analysis revealing an unexpected dimeric 3,3′-t-Bu-substituted Zn(salphen) complex. Dalton Trans. 39, 4541–4550 (2010).Salassa, G., Castilla, A. M. & Kleij, A. W. Cooperative self-assembly of a macrocyclic Schiff base complex. Dalton Trans. 40, 5236–5243 (2011).Hormoz, S. & Brenner, M. P. Design principles for self-assembly with short-range interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 5193–5198 (2011).Biemans, H. A. M. et al. Hexakis porphyrinato benzenes. A new class of porphyrin arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 11054–11060 (1998).Lensen, M. C. et al. Aided self-assembly of porphyrin nanoaggregates into ring-shaped architectures. Chem. Eur. J. 10, 831–839 (2004).Martin, A., Buguin, A. & Brochard-Wyart, F. Dewetting nucleation centers at soft interfaces. Langmuir. 17, 6553–6559 (2001).Schenning, A. P. H. J., Benneker, F. B. G., Geurts, H. P. M., Liu, X. Y. & Nolte, R. J. M. Porphyrin wheels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 8549–8552 (1996).Deegan, R. D. et al. Capillary flow as the cause of ring strains from dried liquid drops. Nature 389, 827–829 (1997).Scriven, L. E. & Sternling, C. V. The Marangoni effects. Nature 187, 186–188 (1960).Cai, Y. & Newby, B. Z. Marangoni flow-induced self-assembly of hexagonal and stripe-like nanoparticle patterns. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6076–6077 (2008).Whitesides, G. M. & Grzybowski, B. Self-assembly at all scales. Science 295, 2418–2421 (2002).Mann, S. Self-assembly and transformation of hybrid nano-objects and nanostructures under equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions. Nat. Mater. 8, 781–792 (2009).Gröschnel, A. H. et al. Precise hierarchical self-assembly of multicompartment micelles. Nat. Commun. 3, 710 (2012).Adam, M., Dogic, Z., Keller, S. L. & Fraden, S. Entropically driven microphase transitions in mixtures of colloidal rods and spheres. Nature 393, 349–352 (1998).Ohara, P. C., Heath, J. R. & Gelbart, W. M. Self-assembly of submicrometer rings of particles from solutions of nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 36, 1077–1080 (1997).Xu, J., Xia, J. & Lin, Z. Evaporation-induced self-assembly of nanoparticles from a sphere-on-flat geometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 1860–1863 (2007).Yosef, G. & Rabani, E. Self-assembly of nanoparticles into rings: A lattice-gas model. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 20965–20972 (2006).Khanal, B. P. & Zubarev, E. R. Rings of nanorods. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 2195–2198 (2007).Wang, Z. et al. One-step, self-assembly, alignment, and patterning of organic semiconductor nanowires by controlled evaporation of confined microfluids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 2811–2815 (2011).Hong, S. W. et al. Directed self-assembly of gradient concentric carbon nanotube rings. Adv. Func. Mater. 18, 2114–2122 (2008).Palma, M. et al. Controlled formation of carbon nanotube junctions via linker-induced assembly in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8440–8443 (2013).Horcas, I. et al. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 013705 (2007).Soler, J. M. et al. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-n materials simulation. J. Phys. Cond. Matter 14, 2745–2779 (2002).Haynes, P. D., Mostof, A. A., Skylaris, C. & Payne, M. C. ONETEP: Linear-scaling density-functional theory with plane-waves. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 26, 143–148 (2006).Valiev, M. et al. NWCHEM: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations. Comp. Phys. Commun. 181, 1477–1489 (2010).Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comp. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995)

Association of kidney disease measures with risk of renal function worsening in patients with type 1 diabetes

Background: Albuminuria has been classically considered a marker of kidney damage progression in diabetic patients and it is routinely assessed to monitor kidney function. However, the role of a mild GFR reduction on the development of stage 653 CKD has been less explored in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic role of kidney disease measures, namely albuminuria and reduced GFR, on the development of stage 653 CKD in a large cohort of patients affected by T1DM. Methods: A total of 4284 patients affected by T1DM followed-up at 76 diabetes centers participating to the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD) initiative constitutes the study population. Urinary albumin excretion (ACR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) were retrieved and analyzed. The incidence of stage 653 CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or eGFR reduction > 30% from baseline was evaluated. Results: The mean estimated GFR was 98 \ub1 17 mL/min/1.73m2 and the proportion of patients with albuminuria was 15.3% (n = 654) at baseline. About 8% (n = 337) of patients developed one of the two renal endpoints during the 4-year follow-up period. Age, albuminuria (micro or macro) and baseline eGFR < 90 ml/min/m2 were independent risk factors for stage 653 CKD and renal function worsening. When compared to patients with eGFR > 90 ml/min/1.73m2 and normoalbuminuria, those with albuminuria at baseline had a 1.69 greater risk of reaching stage 3 CKD, while patients with mild eGFR reduction (i.e. eGFR between 90 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) show a 3.81 greater risk that rose to 8.24 for those patients with albuminuria and mild eGFR reduction at baseline. Conclusions: Albuminuria and eGFR reduction represent independent risk factors for incident stage 653 CKD in T1DM patients. The simultaneous occurrence of reduced eGFR and albuminuria have a synergistic effect on renal function worsening

Reticular synthesis of porous molecular 1D nanotubes and 3D networks

Synthetic control over pore size and pore connectivity is the crowning achievement for porous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). The same level of control has not been achieved for molecular crystals, which are not defined by strong, directional intermolecular coordination bonds. Hence, molecular crystallization is inherently less controllable than framework crystallization, and there are fewer examples of ‘reticular synthesis’, in which multiple building blocks can be assembled according to a common assembly motif. Here we apply a chiral recognition strategy to a new family of tubular covalent cages to create both 1D porous nanotubes and 3D diamondoid pillared porous networks. The diamondoid networks are analogous to MOFs prepared from tetrahedral metal nodes and linear ditopic organic linkers. The crystal structures can be rationalized by computational lattice-energy searches, which provide an in silico screening method to evaluate candidate molecular building blocks. These results are a blueprint for applying the ‘node and strut’ principles of reticular synthesis to molecular crystals