14 research outputs found

    Aspects of Domination Theory

    Get PDF

    Total domination in partitioned graphs

    Get PDF

    Total well dominated trees

    Get PDF

    Total domination in partitioned graphs

    Get PDF

    Distance domination in vertex partitioned graphs

    Get PDF

    Total domination in partitioned trees and partitioned graphs with minimum degree two

    Get PDF

    Total domination in partitioned graphs

    Get PDF

    An upper bound on the domination number of a graph with minimum degree two

    Get PDF
    AbstractA set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex of V(G)∖S is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G is the domination number of G, denoted as γ(G). Let Pn and Cn denote a path and a cycle, respectively, on n vertices. Let k1(F) and k2(F) denote the number of components of a graph F that are isomorphic to a graph in the family {P3,P4,P5,C5} and {P1,P2}, respectively. Let L be the set of vertices of G of degree more than 2, and let G−L be the graph obtained from G by deleting the vertices in L and all edges incident with L. McCuaig and Shepherd [W. McCuaig, B. Shepherd, Domination in graphs with minimum degree two, J. Graph Theory 13 (1989) 749–762] showed that if G is a connected graph of order n≥8 with δ(G)≥2, then γ(G)≤2n/5, while Reed [B.A. Reed, Paths, stars and the number three, Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996) 277–295] showed that if G is a graph of order n with δ(G)≥3, then γ(G)≤3n/8. As an application of Reed’s result, we show that if G is a graph of order n≥14 with δ(G)≥2, then γ(G)≤38n+18k1(G−L)+14k2(G−L)

    On a conjecture about inverse domination in graphs

    Get PDF

    Merrifield-Simmons index and minimum number of independent sets in shor trees

    Get PDF
    corecore