Airships: A New Horizon for Science

The "Airships: A New Horizon for Science" study at the Keck Institute for Space Studies investigated the potential of a variety of airships currently operable or under development to serve as observatories and science instrumentation platforms for a range of space, atmospheric, and Earth science. The participants represent a diverse cross-section of the aerospace sector, NASA, and academia. Over the last two decades, there has been wide interest in developing a high altitude, stratospheric lighter-than-air (LTA) airship that could maneuver and remain in a desired geographic position (i.e., "station-keeping") for weeks, months or even years. Our study found considerable scientific value in both low altitude (< 40 kft) and high altitude (> 60 kft) airships across a wide spectrum of space, atmospheric, and Earth science programs. Over the course of the study period, we identified stratospheric tethered aerostats as a viable alternative to airships where station-keeping was valued over maneuverability. By opening up the sky and Earth's stratospheric horizon in affordable ways with long-term flexibility, airships allow us to push technology and science forward in a project-rich environment that complements existing space observatories as well as aircraft and high-altitude balloon missions.Comment: This low resolution version of the report is 8.6 MB. For the high resolution version see: http://kiss.caltech.edu/study/airship

Stochastic upscaling of hydrodynamic dispersion and retardation factor in a physically and chemically heterogeneous tropical soil

[EN] Stochastic upscaling of flow and reactive solute transport in a tropical soil is performed using real data collected in the laboratory. Upscaling of hydraulic conductivity, longitudinal hydrodynamic dispersion, and retardation factor were done using three different approaches of varying complexity. How uncertainty propagates after upscaling was also studied. The results show that upscaling must be taken into account if a good reproduction of the flow and transport behavior of a given soil is to be attained when modeled at larger than laboratory scales. The results also show that arrival time uncertainty was well reproduced after solute transport upscaling. This work represents a first demonstration of flow and reactive transport upscaling in a soil based on laboratory data. It also shows how simple upscaling methods can be incorporated into daily modeling practice using commercial flow and transport codes.The authors thank the financial support by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Project 401441/2014-8). The doctoral fellowship award to the first author by the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES) is acknowledged. The first author also thanks the international mobility grant awarded by CNPq, through the Sciences Without Borders program (Grant Number: 200597/2015-9). The international mobility grant awarded by Santander Mobility in cooperation with the University of Sao Paulo is also acknowledged. DHI-WASI is gratefully thanked for providing a FEFLOW license.Almeida De-Godoy, V.; Zuquette, L.; Gómez-Hernández, JJ. (2019). Stochastic upscaling of hydrodynamic dispersion and retardation factor in a physically and chemically heterogeneous tropical soil. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 33(1):201-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1624-zS201216331Ahuja LR, Naney JW, Green RE, Nielsen DR (1984) Macroporosity to characterize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:699. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040001xBellin A, Lawrence AE, Rubin Y (2004) Models of sub-grid variability in numerical simulations of solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations: three-dimensional flow and effect of pore-scale dispersion. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0164-2Brent RP (1973) Algorithms for minimization without derivatives. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsBrusseau ML (1998) Non-ideal transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: 3. model testing and data analysis using calibration versus prediction. J Hydrol 209:147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00121-8Brusseau ML, Srivastava R (1999) Nonideal transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: 4. Analysis of the cape cod natural-gradient field experiment. Water Resour Res 35:1113–1125. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900019Brutsaert W (1967) Some methods of calculating unsaturated permeability. Trans ASAE 10:400–404Cadini F, De Sanctis J, Bertoli I, Zio E (2013) Upscaling of a dual-permeability Monte Carlo simulation model for contaminant transport in fractured networks by genetic algorithm parameter identification. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0595-8Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Novak JM, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in central iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033xCapilla JE, Rodrigo J, Gómez-Hernández JJ (1999) Simulation of non-Gaussian transmissivity fields honoring piezometric data and integrating soft and secondary information. Math Geol 31:907–927. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007580902175Cassiraga EF, Fernàndez-Garcia D, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2005) Performance assessment of solute transport upscaling methods in the context of nuclear waste disposal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:756–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.03.013Corey AT (1977) Mechanics of heterogeneous fluids in porous media. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO, p 259Dagan G (1989) Flow and transport in porous formations. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75015-1Dagan G (2004) On application of stochastic modeling of groundwater flow and transport. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0191-7de Azevedo AAB, Pressinotti MMN, Massoli M (1981) Sedimentological studies of the Botucatu and Pirambóia formations in the region of Santa Rita do Passa Quatro (In portuguese). Rev do Inst Geológico 2:31–38. https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-929X.19810003Deng H, Dai Z, Wolfsberg AV, Ye M, Stauffer PH, Lu Z, Kwicklis E (2013) Upscaling retardation factor in hierarchical porous media with multimodal reactive mineral facies. Chemosphere 91:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.105Diersch H-JG (2014) Finite element modeling of flow, mass and heat transport in porous and fractured media. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38739-5Dippenaar MA (2014) Porosity reviewed: quantitative multi-disciplinary understanding, recent advances and applications in vadose zone hydrology. Geotech Geol Eng 32:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9704-9Fagundes JRT, Zuquette LV (2011) Sorption behavior of the sandy residual unconsolidated materials from the sandstones of the Botucatu Formation, the main aquifer of Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 62:831–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0570-yFenton GA, Griffiths DV (2008) Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, p 463Fernàndez-Garcia D, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2007) Impact of upscaling on solute transport: Traveltimes, scale dependence of dispersivity, and propagation of uncertainty. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004727Fernàndez-Garcia D, Llerar-Meza G, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2009) Upscaling transport with mass transfer models: mean behavior and propagation of uncertainty. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007764Feyen L, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Ribeiro PJ, Beven KJ, De Smedt F (2003a) A Bayesian approach to stochastic capture zone delineation incorporating tracer arrival times, conductivity measurements, and hydraulic head observations. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001544Feyen L, Ribeiro PJ, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Beven KJ, De Smedt F (2003b) Bayesian methodology for stochastic capture zone delineation incorporating transmissivity measurements and hydraulic head observations. J Hydrol 271:156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00314-1Forsythe GE, Malcolm MA, Moler CB (1976) Computer methods for mathematical computations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 259Freeze R, Cherry J (1979) Groundwater. PrenticeHall Inc, Englewood cliffs, p 604Frippiat CC, Holeyman AE (2008) A comparative review of upscaling methods for solute transport in heterogeneous porous media. J Hydrol 362:150–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.08.015Fu J, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2009) Uncertainty assessment and data worth in groundwater flow and mass transport modeling using a blocking Markov chain Monte Carlo method. J Hydrol 364:328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.014Gelhar LW, Axness CL (1983) Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 19:161–180. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i001p00161Gelhar LW, Welty C, Rehfeldt KR (1992) A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 28:1955–1974. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00607Giacheti HL, Rohm SA, Nogueira JB, Cintra JCA (1993) Geotechnical properties of the Cenozoic sediment (in protuguese). In: Albiero JH, Cintra JCA (eds) Soil from the interior of São Paulo. ABMS, Sao Paulo, pp 143–175Gómez-Hernandez JJ (1990) A stochastic approach to the simulation of block conductivity fields conditional upon data measured at a smaller scale. Stanford University, StanfordGómez-Hernández JJ, Gorelick SM (1989) Effective groundwater model parameter values: influence of spatial variabiity of hydraulic conductivity, leackance, and recharge. Water Resour Res 25:405–419Gómez-Hernández JJ, Journel A (1993) Joint sequential simulation of multigaussian fields. In: Geostatistics Tróia’92. pp 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_8Gómez-Hernández JJ, Wen X-H (1994) Probabilistic assessment of travel times in groundwater modeling. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 8:19–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581389Gómez-Hernández JJ, Fu J, Fernandez-Garcia D (2006) Upscaling retardation factors in 2-D porous media. In: Bierkens MFP, Gehrels JC, Kovar K (eds) Calibration and reliability in groundwater modelling: from uncertainty to decision making: proceedings of the ModelCARE 2005 conference held in The Hague, The Netherlands, 6–9 June, 2005. IAHS Publication, pp 130–136Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00078-0Jarvis NJ (2007) A review of non-equilibrium water fl ow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur J Soil Sci 58:523–546. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss2011-050Jellali S, Diamantopoulos E, Kallali H, Bennaceur S, Anane M, Jedidi N (2010) Dynamic sorption of ammonium by sandy soil in fixed bed columns: evaluation of equilibrium and non-equilibrium transport processes. J Environ Manag 91:897–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.006Journel AG, Gomez-Hernandez JJ (1993) Stochastic imaging of the wilmington clastic sequence. SPE Form Eval 8:33–40. https://doi.org/10.2118/19857-PAJournel A, Deutsch C, Desbarats A (1986) Power averaging for block effective permeability. Proc SPE Calif Reg Meet. https://doi.org/10.2118/15128-MSKronberg BI, Fyfe WS, Leonardos OH, Santos AM (1979) The chemistry of some Brazilian soils: element mobility during intense weathering. Chem Geol 24:211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(79)90124-4Lake LW (1988) The origins of anisotropy (includes associated papers 18394 and 18458). J Pet Technol 40:395–396. https://doi.org/10.2118/17652-PALawrence AE, Rubin Y (2007) Block-effective macrodispersion for numerical simulations of sorbing solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations. Adv Water Resour 30:1272–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.11.005Lemke LD, Barrack WA II, Abriola LM, Goovaerts P (2004) Matching solute breakthrough with deterministic and stochastic aquifer models. Groundwater 42:920–934Li L, Zhou H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2011a) A comparative study of three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity upscaling at the macro-dispersion experiment (MADE) site, Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi (USA). J Hydrol 404:278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.001Li L, Zhou H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2011b) Transport upscaling using multi-rate mass transfer in three-dimensional highly heterogeneous porous media. Adv Water Resour 34:478–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.001Logsdon Keller KE, Moorman TB (2002) Measured and predicted solute leaching from multiple undisturbed soil columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:686–695. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.6860Lourens A, van Geer FC (2016) Uncertainty propagation of arbitrary probability density functions applied to upscaling of transmissivities. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30:237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1075-8Mahapatra IC, Singh KN, Pillai KG, Bapat SR (1985) Rice soils and their management. Indian J Agron 30:R1–R41Morakinyo JA, Mackay R (2006) Geostatistical modelling of ground conditions to support the assessment of site contamination. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 20:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0015-4Moslehi M, de Barros FPJ, Ebrahimi F, Sahimi M (2016) Upscaling of solute transport in disordered porous media by wavelet transformations. Adv Water Resour 96:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.013Osinubi KJ, Nwaiwu CM (2005) Hydraulic conductivity of compacted lateritic soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:8(1034)Remy N (2004) SGeMS: stanford geostatistical modeling software. Softw Man. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3610-1_89Renard P, de Marsily G (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability: a review. Adv Water Resour 20:253–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00050-4Robin MJL, Sudicky EA, Gillham RW, Kachanoski RG (1991) Spatial variability of strontium distribution coefficients and their correlation with hydraulic conductivity in the Canadian forces base borden aquifer. Water Resour Res 27:2619–2632. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01107Salamon P, Fernàndez-Garcia D, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2007) Modeling tracer transport at the MADE site: the importance of heterogeneity. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005522Sánchez-Vila X, Carrera J, Girardi JP (1996) Scale effects in transmissivity. J Hydrol 183:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80031-XScheibe T, Yabusaki S (1998) Scaling of flow and transport behavior in heterogeneous groundwater systems. Adv Water Resour 22:223–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00014-1Selvadurai PA, Selvadurai APS (2014) On the effective permeability of a heterogeneous porous medium: the role of the geometric mean. Philos Mag 94:2318–2338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2014.913111Shackelford CD (1994) Critical concepts for column testing. J Geotech Eng 120:1804–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)96996-OŠimůnek J, van Genuchten MT, Šejna M, Toride N, Leij FJ (1999) The STANMOD computer software for evaluating solute transport in porous media using analytical solutions of convection-dispersion equation. Riverside, CaliforniaTaskinen A, Sirviö H, Bruen M (2008) Modelling effects of spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity on autocorrelated overland flow data: linear mixed model approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0099-5Tuli A, Hopmans JW, Rolston DE, Moldrup P (2005) Comparison of air and water permeability between disturbed and undisturbed soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1361. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0332Tyukhova AR, Willmann M (2016) Conservative transport upscaling based on information of connectivity. Water Resour Res 52:6867–6880. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018331van Genuchten MTh (1980) Determining transport parameters from solute displacement experiments. Research Report 118. U.S. Salinity Lab., Riverside, CAVanderborght J, Timmerman A, Feyen J (2000) Solute transport for steady-state and transient flow in soils with and without macropores. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6441305xVanmarcke E (2010) Random fields: analysis and synthesis. World Scientific. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 364Vishal V, Leung JY (2017) Statistical scale-up of 3D particle-tracking simulation for non-Fickian dispersive solute transport modeling. Environ Res Risk Assess, Stoch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1501-1Wen X-H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (1996) Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: an overview. J Hydrol 183:ix–xxxii. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80030-8Wen XH, Gómez-Hernández JJ (1998) Numerical modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous media: a comparison of multi-Gaussian and non-multi-Gaussian models. J Contam Hydrol 30:129–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00035-1Wen XH, Capilla JE, Deutsch CV, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Cullick AS (1999) A program to create permeability fields that honor single-phase flow rate and pressure data. Comput Geosci 25:217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00126-5Wilding LP, Drees LR (1983) Spatial variability and pedology. In: Wilding LP, Smeck NE, Hall GF (eds) Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy: the soil orders. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 83–116Willmann M, Carrera J, Guadagnini A (2006) Block-upscaling of transport in heterogeneous aquifers. h2ogeo.upc.edu 1–7Xu Z, Meakin P (2013) Upscaling of solute transport in heterogeneous media with non-uniform flow and dispersion fields. Appl Math Model 37:8533–8542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.03.070Zech A, Attinger S, Cvetkovic V, Dagan G, Dietrich P, Fiori A, Rubin Y, Teutsch G (2015) Is unique scaling of aquifer macrodispersivity supported by field data? Water Resour Res 51:7662–7679. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017220Zhou H, Li L, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2010) Three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity upscaling in groundwater modeling. Comput Geosci 36:1224–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.008Zhou H, Li L, Hendricks Franssen H-J, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2012) Pattern recognition in a bimodal aquifer using the normal-score ensemble Kalman filter. Math Geosci 44:169–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9372-

Comparing Statistical Models of Physical Heterogeneity in Buried-Valley Aquifers

The hypothesis that physical heterogeneity has similarities in separate aquifers created by similar depositional environments is tested by comparing statistical characteristics of facies assemblages. The comparisons are made for a number of data-rich sites in two buried-valley aquifers in the North American midcontinent: the White River aquifer in Indiana and the Miami Valley aquifer in Ohio. These were proglacial valleys that directed drainage away from Quaternary ice margins and were filled with glaciofluvial sediments: predominantly sand and gravel (s) lithofacies, with interbedded mud and diamicton (m) lithofacies. At scales encompassing assemblages of both lithofacies m and s, permeability is strongly bimodal. We find that it is useful to compare statistics that characterize the proportions, geometry, and spatial distribution of each facies. The results give rise to a general model for heterogeneity in valley-fill sediments along the proglacial sluiceway in both aquifers. The proportion of facies m is ∼15%. The mean thickness of facies m is 3.5 m and of the order of 10 m for facies s. The coefficient of variation in thickness for either facies is of the order of 1, with thickness ranging over orders of magnitude. Correspondingly, the vertical autotransition probabilities are exponential, and they are relatively symmetric with effective range of the order of 10 m. The lateral facies lengths are indicated to vary over orders of magnitude and to be multimodally distributed, with mean lengths of the order of 102 m, effective range in correlation structure of the order of 103m, and lateral anisotropy ratio \u3c2. There is some variation in how the facies m are vertically embedded within the facies s. The White River aquifer and areas in the Miami aquifer have facies proportions relatively stationary with elevation. In other areas of the Miami, there are near-horizontal zones having relatively higher or lower proportions. However, such variations on the general model give rise to similar statistics for mass transport within the context of a relevant remediation problem and thus would lead to a similar conclusion or decision. Thus one general model is applicable to both aquifers in this context. In a broader sense, we have illustrated a method by which other examples developed from data-rich sites can be compared