Adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in full RAS and BRAF wildtype stage III colon cancer patients

BACKGROUND: RAS mutations have been shown to confer resistance to anti-EGFR treatment. We analyzed the results of the PETACC8 trial (cetuximab + FOLFOX vs FOLFOX) in full RAS and BRAF wildtype (WT) patients (pts) with resected stage III colon cancer. METHODS: Exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS, and BRAF exons 11 and 15, were sequenced using the Ampliseq colon-lung cancer panel version 2, in PETACC8 trial pts who consented to translational research. The impact of cetuximab on time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated in pts with tumors harboring RAS & BRAF WT and RAS mutations. The prognostic value of each individual mutation was also tested. RESULTS: Among the 2559 pts analyzed, 745 pts (29%) were known to have KRAS exon 2 mutations and 163 pts (6.4%) the BRAF V600E mutation. Of the remaining 1651 pts, 1054 were assessed by NGS, showing that a further 227 pts (21%) had KRAS exon 2,3,4 or NRAS exon 2,3,4 mutations, and that 46 pts (4.4%) had a newly diagnosed BRAF mutation. Cetuximab added to FOLFOX did not significantly improve TTR, DFS or OS in pts with RAS WT or RAS & BRAF WT tumors (HR 0.77 to 1.03, all P>0.05). Cetuximab addition was not either significantly deleterious in RAS mutant pts or in pts with rare RAS or BRAF mutations. In the overall trial population, NRAS and KRAS codon 61 mutations were the only rare mutations with the same pejorative prognostic value as KRAS exon 2 or BRAF V600E mutations. CONCLUSION: Though not significant, the clinically relevant 0.76 adjusted HR observed for DFS in favor of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX, in full RAS and BRAF WT stage III colon cancer pts, may justify a new randomized controlled trial testing EGFR inhibitors in this setting.Clinical trial number: This is an ancillary study of the PETACC8 trial: EUDRACT 2005-003463-23

Multicentre randomised phase III trial comparing Tamoxifen alone or with Transarterial Lipiodol Chemoembolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 9402)

International audienceThe FFCD 9402 multicentre phase III trial was designed to compare the effects of the combination of Transarterial Lipiodol Chemoembolisation (TACE) and tamoxifen with tamoxifen alone on overall survival and quality of life in the palliative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis. From 1995 to 2002, 138 patients were randomised between the two groups. One hundred and twenty three patients were eligible including 61 in the Tamoxifen group and 62 in the TACE group. Baseline characteristics were similar: Child-Pugh class A: 70%, alcoholic cirrhosis: 76%, Okuda stage I: 71%, multinodular tumour: 70% and segmental portal vein thrombosis: 10%. At 2 years, the overall survival was 22% and 25% in the Tamoxifen and TACE groups (P = .68), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified four independent prognostic factors for survival: α-fetoprotein (AFP) &gt; 400 ng/mL (P = .008), abdominal pain (P = .011), hepatomegaly (P = .023) and Child-Pugh score (P = .032). The Spitzer Index level assessing the quality of life during follow-up did not differ between the two groups (P = .70). Amongst patients with stage Okuda I, the 2-year overall survival was 28% in the Tamoxifen group and 32% in the TACE group (P = .58). In this subgroup, two prognostic factors were statistically significant for survival: AFP &gt; 400 ng/mL (P = .004) and Spitzer Index (P = .013) as shown by multivariable analysis.In conclusion, this study suggests that TACE improves neither the survival nor the quality of life in patients with HCC and cirrhosis.</p

Adjuvant FOLFOX+ cetuximab vs FOLFOX in full RAS and BRAF wild type stage III colon cancer patients: Results from the PETACC8 trial

IF 9.269International audienceBackground: RAS mutations have been shown to confer resistance to anti-EGFR treatment. We assessed here the results of the PETACC8 trial (Cetuximab + FOLFOX vs FOLFOX) in full wild type (WT) patients (pts) (RAS & BRAF). The prognostic impact of individual rare RAS and BRAF mutations has been tested.Methods: Exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS as well as BRAF exon 11 and 15 have been sequenced, using the ampliseq colon lung cancer panel V2, among the pts who have signed informed consent for translational research. The impact of cetuximab on Time To Recurrence (TTR), Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), has been investigated in pts RAS WT, RAS & BRAF double WT tumors and in pts with rare..

Adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in full RAS and BRAF wildtype stage III colon cancer patients

Background: RAS mutations have been shown to confer resistance to anti- epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment. We analysed the results of the PETACC8 trial (cetuximab+FOLFOX vs FOLFOX) in full RAS and BRAF wildtype (WT) patients (pts) with resected stage III colon cancer. Patients and methods: Exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS, and BRAF exons 11 and 15, were sequenced using the Ampliseq colon-lung cancer panel version 2, in PETACC8 trial pts who consented to translational research. The impact of cetuximab on time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated in pts with tumours harbouring RAS and BRAF WT, and RAS mutations. The prognostic value of each individual mutation was also tested. Results: Among the 2559 pts analysed, 745 pts (29%) were known to have KRAS exon 2 mutations and 163 pts (6.4%) the BRAF V600E mutation. Of the remaining 1651 pts, 1054 were assessed by NGS, showing that a further 227 pts (21%) had KRAS exon 2, 3, 4 or NRAS exon 2, 3, 4 mutations, and that 46 pts (4.4%) had a newly diagnosed BRAF mutation. Cetuximab added to FOLFOX did not significantly improve TTR, DFS or OS in pts with RAS WT or RAS and BRAF WT tumours (HR 0.77-1.03, all P>0.05). Cetuximab addition was not either significantly deleterious in RAS mutant pts or in pts with rare RAS or BRAF mutations. In the overall trial population, NRAS and KRAS codon 61 mutations were the only rare mutations with the same pejorative prognostic value as KRAS exon 2 or BRAF V600E mutations. Conclusion: Though not significant, the clinically relevant 0.76 adjusted HR observed for DFS in favour of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX, in full RAS and BRAF WT stage III colon cancer pts, may justify a new randomized controlled trial testing EGFR inhibitors in this setting. Clinical trial number: This is an ancillary study of the PETACC8 trial: EUDRACT 2005-003463-23.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe