An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Risk Minimization Measures for Tigecycline in the European Union

Background: Risk minimization measures (RMM) were implemented from February 2011 in the European Union to address risks of superinfection, off-label use and lack of efficacy associated with tigecycline. The objective of this study was to evaluate RMM effectiveness by describing prescription patterns among adults and children treated with any dose of tigecycline for any indication pre- and post-RMM implementation; incidence proportions of superinfection and lack of efficacy among adults treated with approved doses of tigecycline for complicated intra-abdominal infection and complicated skin and soft tissue infection were also evaluated. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective chart-abstraction study, including charts from 777 patients (399 pre-RMM, 378 post-RMM) at 13 sites across Austria, Germany, Italy, Greece and the United Kingdom (UK). Potential superinfection and lack of efficacy cases among those using tigecycline for on-label indication, age, dose, and duration were adjudicated. The distribution of indications for tigecycline was analyzed overall (i.e. across both study periods) and stratified by study period. Numbers and incidence proportions of superinfection and lack of efficacy cases (potential and adjudicated) were calculated overall and by study period. Results: Off-label use (indication or age) decreased from 54.2% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 49.0, 59.3%] pre-RMM to 35.7% (95% CI 30.4, 41.2%) post-RMM. Overall, 45.7% (95% CI 41.9, 49.5%) of patients were prescribed tigecycline off-label; the most commonly reported off-label indications were characterized as \u201cother\u201d (25.5%), hospital acquired pneumonia (8.2%), other pneumonia (6.3%), bacteremia (5.2%) and diabetic foot infection (1.5%). Across study periods, incidence proportions of definite or probable superinfection and lack of efficacy in adults treated for approved indications, authorized treatment doses and duration were 4.5% (95% CI 2.1, 8.4%) and 5.5% (95% CI 2.8, 9.7%), respectively. Conclusions: Off-label use of tigecycline decreased following RMM implementation. Overall incidence proportions of definite or probable superinfection and lack of efficacy were low. EU PAS register number: EUPAS3674

Non-inferiority of short-term urethral catheterization following fistula repair surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A vaginal fistula is a devastating condition, affecting an estimated 2 million girls and women across Africa and Asia. There are numerous challenges associated with providing fistula repair services in developing countries, including limited availability of operating rooms, equipment, surgeons with specialized skills, and funding from local or international donors to support surgeries and subsequent post-operative care. Finding ways of providing services in a more efficient and cost-effective manner, without compromising surgical outcomes and the overall health of the patient, is paramount. Shortening the duration of urethral catheterization following fistula repair surgery would increase treatment capacity, lower costs of services, and potentially lower risk of healthcare-associated infections among fistula patients. There is a lack of empirical evidence supporting any particular length of time for urethral catheterization following fistula repair surgery. This study will examine whether short-term (7 day) urethral catheterization is not worse by more than a minimal relevant difference to longer-term (14 day) urethral catheterization in terms of incidence of fistula repair breakdown among women with simple fistula presenting at study sites for fistula repair service.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>This study is a facility-based, multicenter, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the new proposed short-term (7 day) urethral catheterization to longer-term (14 day) urethral catheterization in terms of predicting fistula repair breakdown. The primary outcome is fistula repair breakdown up to three months following fistula repair surgery as assessed by a urinary dye test. Secondary outcomes will include repair breakdown one week following catheter removal, intermittent catheterization due to urinary retention and the occurrence of septic or febrile episodes, prolonged hospitalization for medical reasons, catheter blockage, and self-reported residual incontinence. This trial will be conducted among 512 women with simple fistula presenting at 8 study sites for fistula repair surgery over the course of 24 months at each site.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>If no major safety issues are identified, the data from this trial may facilitate adoption of short-term urethral catheterization following repair of simple fistula in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01428830">NCT01428830</a>.</p