47 research outputs found

    Collecting Usage Data for Digital Preservation

    Get PDF
    While IT environments are moving towards personalized and context-aware adaptive content and services, digital preservation systems should go beyond the current mechanisms to preserve digital objects. Social and personal experiences need to be investigated as part of the context of digital resources, i.e., the way in which a resource was used and perceived, by retaining usage data for instance. Overall, users have to be further involved in the digital preservation processes, in the creation of context metadata, in the storage and migration of resources, in particular for personal archives

    Questions juridiques liées au passage des systèmes informatiques à l\u27an 2000 (Les)

    Get PDF

    The CIC metadata portal: A collaborative effort in the area of digital libraries

    Full text link
    Article copies available from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH | [email protected] | http://www.HaworthPress.com/The CIC consortium includes 12 major Midwestern Universities. Their libraries have decided to share the cost of a joint project (2003-2006) aimed at better understanding the mechanisms by which emerging technologies and standards can facilitate metadata sharing and the creation of value-added services for their users. The CIC metadata portal project has performed advanced work in the area of Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, collection level descriptions, metadata transformation and enrichment, and practices and usability of metadata standards. It has provided an opportunity for increased collaboration between CIC academic libraries and a way to highlight the wealth of digital resources held by the participating libraries. This article describes the project and enumerates project accomplishments. The project has helped to better the way in which partner institutions share information about digital content and provide access to digital resources. Four content providers of the project highlight different aspects of the project and the practical benefits they found in the collaboration.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/58774/1/STL_Foulonneau.pd

    Open Archives Initiatives Protocol for Metadata Harvesting - Practices for the cultural heritage sector

    Get PDF
    The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for metadata harvesting underlies an organisational model with data providers, service providers and aggregators. In the context of cultural heritage actors, those aggregators can represent an opportunity to match the missing competences in small institutions which need to expose their metadata. Indeed, the protocol can organise value-added services based on the material created in memory organisations for ages to describe their asset. It can be used to make their resources accessible on the Web, to let other institutions set up cross-institutions and possibly cross-domain services, to allow their data to be re-used in various contexts. It is also becoming a standard way to exchange XML formatted data and to synchronise repositories for downstream services such as name authorities. Still, the protocol does not remove the interoperability barriers and issues on metadata quality, on heterogeneous original descriptions, organisational issues such as data update, integrated access to aggregated and heterogeneous resources must be dealt with, within a proper partnership between data providers and the service provider. The conditions of use, guarantees of quality on metadata, content, service and data provider's Websites shall be included in an agreement, whether a charter or a proper contract to ensure responsibilities of each partner, quality of its performances and legal issues related to cultural heritage content. The development of OAI-based services in the cultural heritage sector seems to be led by several key services funded to set up a proper OAI framework. It appears easier for the service provider to directly set up an aggregator for those institutions for smaller institutions, with poor competences in ICTs. Still, many areas and subjects are still to be tested, such as the use of OAI with large schemas, services based on data re-use, mixing information retrieval through both full text and metadata… especially, the management of aggregated resources is a challenge to service provider since they do not control the evolution of their collections. The Community report on practices the Open Archives Initiative of Metadata Harvesting by cultural heritage actors is available on the OAForum Website http://www.oaforum.org/documents/. It studies the conditions for memory organisations to use the protocol, what they can do with it, the issues to take into account and the solutions already implemented or being considered
    corecore