A randomised open-label study of tiagabine given two or three times daily in refractory epilepsy

SummaryEfficacy and tolerability of tiagabine was evaluated in patients with non-controlled partial seizures in a multicentre, open-label, parallel group study. Tiagabine was administered either two (b.i.d.) or three times daily (t.i.d.) as adjunctive therapy and titrated stepwise to a target of 40mg/day during a 12-week, fixed-schedule titration period; this was followed by a 12-week flexible continuation period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients completing the fixed-schedule titration period. A total of 243 patients were randomised and received treatment, 123 to b.i.d. and 120 to t.i.d. dosing. Fewer patients in the b.i.d. (76 and 62%) than in the t.i.d. (87 and 72%) group completed the fixed-schedule titration period (OR: 0.562; 95% CI: 0.309–1.008; P=0.0532). The median percentage decrease in all types of seizure (excluding status epilepticus) during the fixed schedule titration period was 33.4% for the b.i.d. and 23.8% for the t.i.d. groups (P=0.9634; Van Elteren's test). The proportion of responders was similar for the b.i.d. and t.i.d. groups. There were no significant differences between dosage regimens in the change in median seizure rates from baseline. Adverse events were more frequent during the titration than the continuation period. Most events were mild and related to the central nervous system. Although their incidence was similar between treatment groups, severity was more frequent in the b.i.d. group. Our results suggest that during titration tiagabine is better tolerated with t.i.d. dosing, but during long-term maintenance, a t.i.d. schedule is as effective and well tolerated as b.i.d

Oxcarbazepina en el tratamiento de la epilepsia focal refractaria

Introducción: Los objetivos del estudio son analizar la eficacia y la tolerabilidad de la oxcarbazepina en pacientes afectos de epilepsia focal refractaria. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo con treinta pacientes tratados con oxcarbazepina a dosis de 1.200-1.800 mg. Visita basal y visitas a los dos, cuatro y seis meses. Resultados: Se registraron cuatro abandonos por ineficacia y ninguno por efectos adversos. La tasa media de reducción fue del 32% y la tasa de respondedores (reducción =50%) del 26,7 %. Cinco pacientes quedaron libres de crisis. La respuesta fue superior en los pacientes que no padecen crisis parciales con generalización secundaria. Discusión: La oxcarbazepina es un fármaco útil en el tratamiento de la epilepsia focal sintomática refractaria a otros tratamientos

Comparative study of antiepileptic drug use during pregnancy over a period of 12 years in Spain. Efficacy of the newer antiepileptic drugs lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and oxcarbazepine

Introduction: The prescription pattern of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy is changing but to what extent this is occurring in Spain remains unknown. The efficacy of newer drugs for controlling seizures is a key issue and may have changed over the years as doctors gained familiarity with these drugs during pregnancy. To assess these 2 topics, we report the results from the Spanish EURAP register gathered over a 12-year period. Material and methods: After signing informed consent forms, patients were included in the register and evaluated at onset of pregnancy, at the end of the second and third trimesters, after delivery, and one year after delivery. For the purposes of this study, we analysed AEDs, type of epilepsy, seizure frequency per trimester and throughout pregnancy, percentage of seizure-free pregnancies, and frequency of congenital malformations. We then compared data from 2 periods (June 2001 to October 2007 and January 2008 to May 2015). Results: We compared 304 monotherapies from the older period to 127 from the more recent one. There was a clear increase in the use of levetiracetam (LEV) with declining use of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, and phenobarbital; a slight decline in use of valproate (VPA), and a slight increase in the use of lamotrigine (LTG) and oxcarbazepine (OXC). Epilepsy types treated with CBZ and VPA remained unchanged, whereas fewer cases of generalised epilepsy were treated with LTG in the new period. This trend was not associated with significant changes in seizure frequency, but rather linked to better control over de novo seizures in the third trimester. LEV was similar to CBZ and VPA with regard to levels of seizure control, and more effective than LTG. Generalised epilepsy accounted for 64% of the cases treated with LEV. Conclusions: The prescription pattern of AEDs during pregnancy has changed in Spain, with diminishing use of CBZ, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Changes also reflect the type of epilepsy, since there is less use of LTG for generalised epilepsy. LEV provides similar seizure control to that of the older AEDs, and it is more effective and better than LTG. Resumen: Introducción: El patrón de uso de fármacos antiepilépticos (FAE) durante el embarazo difiere entre países y está cambiando. Se desconoce en qué medida ello afecta a la población española. La eficacia de los nuevos fármacos en el control de las crisis es motivo de preocupación y puede haber cambiado a lo largo de los años debido a un mejor conocimiento de su uso durante el embarazo. Con el objetivo de analizar estos 2 aspectos reportamos los resultados del registro EURAP España durante un periodo de 12 años. Material y métodos: Tras el consentimiento informado, las pacientes son incluidas en el registro y evaluadas al inicio del embarazo, al final del segundo y tercer trimestres, después del parto y al año del nacimiento. Para los objetivos de este estudio hemos analizado: FAE, tipo de epilepsia, frecuencia de crisis por trimestres y a lo largo del embarazo, porcentaje de pacientes libres de crisis, y frecuencia de malformaciones congénitas mayores. Hemos comparado estas variables en 2 periodos (junio de 2001-octubre de 2007 y enero de 2008-mayo de 2015). Resultados: Un total de 304 monoterapias del periodo antiguo se comparan con 127 del periodo nuevo. Observamos un ascenso del uso de levetiracetam (LEV) y un descenso del uso de carbamacepina (CBZ), fenitoína y fenobarbital; un leve descenso del uso de valproato (VPA), y un leve aumento de lamotrigina (LTG) y oxacarbamacepina (OXC). El tipo de epilepsia se mantiene estable para CBZ y VPA, pero cambia para LTG, con menos epilepsias generalizadas tratadas con este fármaco en el periodo nuevo. Ello no se asocia con un cambio significativo de la frecuencia de crisis, pero sí con un mejor control de las crisis de novo en el tercer trimestre. LEV se asocia a niveles de control de crisis similares a los de CBZ y VPA y mejor que con LTG. De las pacientes tratadas con LEV, un 64% tenían una epilepsia generalizada. Conclusiones: El patrón de uso de los diferentes FAE durante el embarazo está cambiando en España, con menos uso de CBZ, fenitoína y fenobarbital y un aumento del uso de LEV. El tipo de epilepsia también cambia, con un porcentaje inferior de pacientes tratadas con LTG para epilepsias generalizadas. LEV controla las crisis de manera similar a los fármacos clásicos y mejor que la LTG. Keywords: Epilepsy, Antiepileptic drugs, Pregnancy, Seizures, Lamotrigine, Levetiracetam, Palabras clave: Epilepsia, Fármacos antiepilépticos, Embarazo, Crisis, Lamotrigina, Levetiraceta

Estudio comparativo del uso de fármacos antiepilépticos durante el embarazo en un periodo de 12 años. Eficacia de los nuevos fármacos lamotrigina, levetiracetam y oxacarbamacepina

Resumen: Introducción: El patrón de uso de fármacos antiepilépticos (FAE) durante el embarazo difiere entre países y está cambiando. Se desconoce en qué medida ello afecta a la población española. La eficacia de los nuevos fármacos en el control de las crisis es motivo de preocupación y puede haber cambiado a lo largo de los años debido a un mejor conocimiento de su uso durante el embarazo. Con el objetivo de analizar estos 2 aspectos reportamos los resultados del registro EURAP España durante un periodo de 12 años. Material y métodos: Tras el consentimiento informado, las pacientes son incluidas en el registro y evaluadas al inicio del embarazo, al final del segundo y tercer trimestres, después del parto y al año del nacimiento. Para los objetivos de este estudio hemos analizado: FAE, tipo de epilepsia, frecuencia de crisis por trimestres y a lo largo del embarazo, porcentaje de pacientes libres de crisis, y frecuencia de malformaciones congénitas mayores. Hemos comparado estas variables en 2 periodos (junio de 2001-octubre de 2007) y (enero de 2008-mayo de 2015). Resultados: Un total de 304 monoterapias del periodo antiguo se comparan con 127 del periodo nuevo. Observamos un ascenso del uso de levetiracetam (LEV) y un descenso del uso de carbamacepina (CBZ), fenitoína y fenobarbital; un leve descenso del uso de valproato (VPA), y un leve aumento de lamotrigina (LTG) y oxacarbamacepina (OXC). El tipo de epilepsia se mantiene estable para CBZ y VPA, pero cambia para LTG, con menos epilepsias generalizadas tratadas con este fármaco en el periodo nuevo. Ello no se asocia con un cambio significativo de la frecuencia de crisis, pero sí con un mejor control de las crisis de novo en el tercer trimestre. LEV se asocia a niveles de control de crisis similares a los de CBZ y VPA y mejor que con LTG. De las pacientes tratadas con LEV, un 64% tenían una epilepsia generalizada. Conclusiones: El patrón de uso de los diferentes FAE durante el embarazo está cambiando en España, con menos uso de CBZ, fenitoína y fenobarbital y un aumento del uso de LEV. El tipo de epilepsia también cambia, con un porcentaje inferior de pacientes tratadas con LTG para epilepsias generalizadas. LEV controla las crisis de manera similar a los fármacos clásicos y mejor que la LTG. Abstract: Introduction: The prescription pattern of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy is changing but to what extent this is occurring in Spain remains unknown. The efficacy of newer drugs for controlling seizures is a key issue and may have changed over the years as doctors gained familiarity with these drugs during pregnancy. To assess these 2 topics, we report the results from the Spanish EURAP register gathered over a 12-year period. Material and methods: After signing informed consent forms, patients were included in the register and evaluated at onset of pregnancy, at the end of the second and third trimesters, after delivery, and one year after delivery. For the purposes of this study, we analysed AEDs, type of epilepsy, seizure frequency per trimester and throughout pregnancy, percentage of seizure-free pregnancies, and frequency of congenital malformations. We then compared data from 2 periods (June 2001-October 2007) and (January 2008-May 2015) Results: We compared 304 monotherapies from the older period to 127 from the more recent one. There was a clear increase in the use of levetiracetam (LEV) with declining use of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, and phenobarbital; a slight decline in use of valproate (VPA), and a slight increase in the use of lamotrigine (LTG) and oxcarbazepine (OXC). Epilepsy types treated with CBZ and VPA remained unchanged, whereas fewer cases of generalised epilepsy were treated with LTG in the new period. This trend was not associated with significant changes in seizure frequency, but rather linked to better control over de novo seizures in the third trimester. LEV was similar to CBZ and VPA with regard to levels of seizure control, and more effective than LTG. Generalised epilepsy accounted for 64% of the cases treated with LEV. Conclusions: The prescription pattern of AEDs during pregnancy has changed in Spain, with diminishing use of CBZ, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Changes also reflect the type of epilepsy, since there is less use of LTG for generalised epilepsy. LEV provides similar seizure control to that of the older AEDs, and it is more effective and better than LTG. Palabras clave: Epilepsia, Fármacos antiepilépticos, Embarazo, Crisis, Lamotrigina, Levetiracetam, Keywords: Epilepsy, Antiepileptic drugs, Pregnancy, Seizures, Lamotrigine, Levetiraceta

Comparison of levetiracetam and controlled-release carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy

We report the results of a prospective study of the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam, a new antiepileptic drug with a unique mechanism of action, in comparison with controlled-release carbamazepine as first treatment in newly diagnosed epilepsy.Adults with > or =2 partial or generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the previous year were randomly assigned to levetiracetam (500 mg twice daily, n = 288) or controlled-release carbamazepine (200 mg twice daily, n = 291) in a multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority, parallel-group trial. If a seizure occurred within 26 weeks of stabilization, dosage was increased incrementally to a maximum of levetiracetam 1,500 mg twice daily or carbamazepine 600 mg twice daily. Patients achieving the primary endpoint (6-month seizure freedom) continued on treatment for a further 6-month maintenance period.At per-protocol analysis, 73.0\% (56.6\%) of patients randomized to levetiracetam and 72.8\% (58.5\%) receiving controlled-release carbamazepine were seizure free at the last evaluated dose (adjusted absolute difference 0.2\%, 95\% CI -7.8\% to 8.2\%) for > or =6 months (1 year). Of all patients achieving 6-month (1-year) remission, 80.1\% (86.0\%) in the levetiracetam group and 85.4\% (89.3\%) in the carbamazepine group did so at the lowest dose level. Withdrawal rates for adverse events were 14.4\% with levetiracetam and 19.2\% with carbamazepine.Levetiracetam and controlled-release carbamazepine produced equivalent seizure freedom rates in newly diagnosed epilepsy at optimal dosing in a setting mimicking clinical practice. This trial has confirmed in a randomized, double-blind setting previously uncontrolled observations that most people with epilepsy will respond to their first-ever antiepileptic drug at low dosage