2 research outputs found
The matter distribution in z ~ 0.5 redshift clusters of galaxies. II : The link between dark and visible matter
We present an optical analysis of a sample of 11 clusters built from the
EXCPRES sample of X-ray selected clusters at intermediate redshift (z ~ 0.5).
With a careful selection of the background galaxies we provide the mass maps
reconstructed from the weak lensing by the clusters. We compare them with the
light distribution traced by the early-type galaxies selected along the red
sequence for each cluster. The strong correlations between dark matter and
galaxy distributions are confirmed, although some discrepancies arise, mostly
for merging or perturbed clusters. The average M/L ratio of the clusters is
found to be: M/L_r = 160 +/- 60 in solar units (with no evolutionary
correction), in excellent agreement with similar previous studies. No strong
evolutionary effects are identified even if the small sample size reduces the
significance of the result. We also provide a individual analysis of each
cluster in the sample with a comparison between the dark matter, the galaxies
and the gas distributions. Some of the clusters are studied for the first time
in the optical.Comment: 25 pages, 9 figues + 11 figures in Annex, 4 tables. Accepted for
publication in A&A. 1 reference correcte
Dissecting the Strong-lensing Galaxy Cluster MS 0440.5+0204. I. The Mass Density Profile
International audienceWe present a parametric strong-lensing modeling of the galaxy cluster MS 0440.5+0204 (located at z = 0.19). We have performed a strong-lensing mass reconstruction of the cluster using three different models. The first model uses the image positions of four multiply imaged systems (providing 26 constraints). The second one combines strong-lensing constraints with dynamical information (velocity dispersion) of the cluster. The third one uses the mass calculated from weak lensing as an additional constraint. Our three models reproduce equally well the image positions of the arcs, with an rms image equal to ≈0.″5. However, in the third model, the inclusion of the velocity dispersion and the weak-lensing mass allows us to obtain better constraints in the scale radius and the line-of-sight velocity dispersion of the mass profile. For this model, we obtain r s = kpc, km s−1, M 200 = ×1014 , and a high concentration c 200 = . Finally, we used our derived mass profile to calculate the mass up to 1.5 Mpc. We compare it with X-ray estimates previously reported, finding a good agreement