K-Ras-Mutationen in ovariellen und extraovariellen Herden von serösen LMP-Tumoren (Borderline-Tumoren) des Ovars

K-RAS-Mutationen sind die häufigsten genetischen Veränderungen bei serösen Borderline-Tumoren des Ovars. Nach wie vor ist die Pathogenese der assoziierten ovariellen und extraovariellen Läsionen, die ein Spektrum von Müller-Inklusionszysten (Endosalpingiose) über Implantate bis hin zu kontralateralen LMP-Tumoren umfassen, ungeklärt. Um eine multifokale Entstehung dieser Herde von metastasenartiger Streuung zu unterscheiden, wurden diese Läsionen auf eine Mutation im K-RAS Onkogen hin untersucht. Acht Fälle mit bekannter K-RAS-Mutation und zwei RAS-negative Fälle ohne RAS-Mutation wurden zum Vergleich analysiert. Insgesamt wurde DNA aus 58 in Paraffin eingebetteten und laser-mikrodissezierten ovariellen und extraovariellen Herden extrahiert (10 SBOT, 8 kontralaterale Tumoren, 25 Implantate, 15 Inklusionszysten, insgesamt 97 Proben). Es wurde das Codon 12 des Exon 1 des K-RAS-Onkogens auf Mutationen mit einer DGGE voruntersucht und die genaue Art der Mutation durch direkte Sequenzierung bestimmt. In 12 von 14 SBOT und in 2 von 2 extraovariellen Implantaten konnte die K-RAS Mutation in verschiedenen Bereichen der gleichen Läsion gefunden werden. Sämtliche RAS-positive ovariellen Borderline-Tumoren, die mit einem kontralateralen Tumor assoziiert waren, wiesen in beiden Tumoren die identische Mutation auf (in einem Fall enthielt die oberflächliche Komponente des Borderline-Tumors eine zusätzliche zweite Punktmutation). In 4 von 5 RAS-positiven SBOT mit extraovariellen Läsionen wurden RAS-Mutationen auch in Implantaten (15/21 Implantate 71%) gefunden und seltener in Inklusionszysten (3/12 Läsionen, 25%). Alle extraovariellen Mutationen waren mit der des Ovars identisch (18/18 Läsionen, 100%). Bei den RAS-negativen Kontroll-Fällen ließ sich nur bei einem einzelnen Implantat eine RAS-Mutation nachweisen. Die Tatsache, daß sich K-RAS-Mutationen in Müller-Inklusionszysten und Implantaten von SBOT nachweisen lassen, weisen daraufhin, daß es sich dabei um einen sehr frühen Schritt in der neoplastischen Transformation von ovariellem und extraovariellem serösem Epithel handelt. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie legen die Vermutung nahe, daß die zwei postulierten pathogenetischen Mechanismen, die zur Entwicklung von Implantaten und Inklusionszysten führen sollen, nebeneinander koexistieren

Is the efficacy of psychopharmacological drugs comparable to the efficacy of general medicine medication?

There is an ongoing debate concerning the risk benefit ratio of psychopharmacologic compounds. With respect to the benefit, recent reports and meta-analyses note only small effect sizes with comparably high placebo response rates in the psychiatric field. These reports together with others lead to a wider, general critique on psychotropic drugs in the scientific community and in the lay press. In a recently published article, Leucht and his colleagues compare the efficacy of psychotropic drugs with the efficacy of common general medicine drugs in different indications according to results from reviewed meta-analyses. The authors conclude that, overall, the psychiatric drugs were generally not less effective than most other medical drugs. This article will highlight some of the results of this systematic review and discuss the limitations and the impact of this important approach on the above mentioned debate

Results from the Randomized Controlled Multicenter German Algorithm Project 3 Trial

Background Treatment algorithms are considered as key to improve outcomes by enhancing the quality of care. This is the first randomized controlled study to evaluate the clinical effect of algorithm-guided treatment in inpatients with major depressive disorder. Methods Inpatients, aged 18 to 70 years with major depressive disorder from 10 German psychiatric departments were randomized to 5 different treatment arms (from 2000 to 2005), 3 of which were standardized stepwise drug treatment algorithms (ALGO). The fourth arm proposed medications and provided less specific recommendations based on a computerized documentation and expert system (CDES), the fifth arm received treatment as usual (TAU). ALGO included 3 different second-step strategies: lithium augmentation (ALGO LA), antidepressant dose-escalation (ALGO DE), and switch to a different antidepressant (ALGO SW). Time to remission (21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤9) was the primary outcome. Results Time to remission was significantly shorter for ALGO DE (n=91) compared with both TAU (n=84) (HR=1.67; P=.014) and CDES (n=79) (HR=1.59; P=.031) and ALGO SW (n=89) compared with both TAU (HR=1.64; P=.018) and CDES (HR=1.56; P=.038). For both ALGO LA (n=86) and ALGO DE, fewer antidepressant medications were needed to achieve remission than for CDES or TAU (P<.001). Remission rates at discharge differed across groups; ALGO DE had the highest (89.2%) and TAU the lowest rates (66.2%). Conclusions A highly structured algorithm-guided treatment is associated with shorter times and fewer medication changes to achieve remission with depressed inpatients than treatment as usual or computerized medication choice guidance

The FKBP5 polymorphism rs1360780 influences the effect of an algorithm-based antidepressant treatment and is associated with remission in patients with major depression

Objective: The FKBP5-gene influences the HPA-system by modulating the sensitivity of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The polymorphism rs1360780 has been associated with response in studies with heterogeneous antidepressant treatment. In contrast, several antidepressant studies with standardized antidepressant treatment could not detect this effect. We therefore compared patients with standardized vs naturalistic antidepressant treatment to (a) investigate a possible interaction between FKBP5-genotype and treatment mode and (b) replicate the effect of the FKBP5-genotype on antidepressant treatment outcome. Methods: A total of 298 major depressive disorder (MDD) inpatients from the multicentred German project and the Zurich Algorithm Project were genotyped for their FKBP5 status. Patients were treated as usual (n=127) or according to a standardized algorithm (n=171). Main outcome criteria was remission (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21<10). Results: We detected an interaction of treatment as usual (TAU) treatment and C-allele with the worst outcome for patients combining those two factors (HR=0.46;p=0.000). Even though C-allele patients did better when treated in the structured, stepwise treatment algorithm (SSTR) group, we still could confirm the influence of the FKBP5-genotype in the whole sample (HR=0.52;p=0.01). Conclusions: This is the first study to show an interaction between a genetic polymorphism and treatment mode. Patients with the C-allele of the rs1360780 polymorphism seem to benefit from a standardized antidepressant treatment

Impact of axial active magnetic bearing stiffness coefficient on resonance frequencies of reaction wheel rotor

Разработана математическая модель системы «ротор - электромагнитные подшипники» для электродвигателя-маховика системы ориентации и стабилизации космического аппарата. Модель учитывает собственные частоты изгибных колебаний ротора и коэффициенты жесткости электромагнитных подшипников. Предложен способ повышения угловой жесткости системы путем применения многополюсного осевого электромагнитного подшипника и рассмотрено влияние его коэффициента жесткости на собственные частоты системы.The paper presents the mathematical model of «rotor - active magnetic bearings» system for reaction wheel used in spacecraft attitude control system. Developed model consider the natural frequencies of rotor bending oscillations and stiffness parameters of electromagnetic bearing. Method of angular stiffness increasing by using multipolar axial magnetic bearing is suggested and the results of impact analysis of multipolar axial magnetic bearing stiffness on resonance frequencies of system is considered

Mirroring everyday clinical practice in clinical trial design: a new concept to improve the external validity of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials in the pharmacological treatment of major depression

Background: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials constitute the gold standard in clinical research when testing the efficacy of new psychopharmacological interventions in the treatment of major depression. However, the blinded use of placebo has been found to influence clinical trial outcomes and may bias patient selection. Discussion: To improve clinical trial design in major depression so as to reflect clinical practice more closely we propose to present patients with a balanced view of the benefits of study participation irrespective of their assignment to placebo or active treatment. In addition every participant should be given the option to finally receive the active medication. A research agenda is outlined to evaluate the impact of the proposed changes on the efficacy of the drug to be evaluated and on the demographic and clinical characteristics of the enrollment fraction with regard to its representativeness of the eligible population. Summary: We propose a list of measures to be taken to improve the external validity of double-blind, placebocontrolled trials in major depression. The recommended changes to clinical trial design may also be relevant for other psychiatric as well as medical disorders in which expectations regarding treatment outcome may affect the outcome itself

Evaluating Depressive Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Psychometric Comparison of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

Background: The aim of this study was to compare two measures of depression in patients with schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorder, including patients with delusional and schizoaffective disorder, to conclude implications for their application. Sampling and Methods: A total of 278 patients were assessed using the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was also applied. At admission and discharge, a principal component analysis was performed with each depression scale. The two depression rating scales were furthermore compared using correlation and regression analyses. Results: Three factors were revealed for the CDSS and HAMD-17 factor component analysis. A very similar item loading was found for the CDSS at admission and discharge, whereas results of the loadings of the HAMD-17 items were less stable. The first two factors of the CDSS revealed correlations with positive, negative and general psychopathology. In contrast, multiple significant correlations were found for the HAMD-17 factors and the PANSS sub-scores. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that the HAMD-17 accounted more for the positive and negative symptom domains than the CDSS. Conclusions:The present results suggest that compared to the HAMD-17, the CDSS is a more specific instrument to measure depressive symptoms in schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorder, especially in acutely ill patients. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Base