1,246 research outputs found

    Tribute to Judge Betty Binns Fletcher

    Get PDF
    Thank you very much for the invitation to introduce this wonderful symposium honoring my mother, Judge Betty Binns Fletcher. Let me begin by thanking my mother. Without her I would not be here. I realize that everyone can, and should, thank their mother for being here—that is, for their very existence. But I mean my thanks not only in that way. I mean also that without her I really would not be here—at this podium, speaking to you as a judge on the Ninth Circuit

    Common Nucleus of Operative Fact and Defensive Set-Off: Beyond the Gibbs Test

    Get PDF
    Symposium: A Reappraisal of the Supplemental-Jurisdiction Statute: Title 28 U.S.C. § 1367

    Protection for Indian Sacred Sites

    Get PDF

    Atomic Bomb Testing and the Warner Amendment: A Violation of the Separation of Powers

    Get PDF
    Hundreds of thousands of American soldiers and civilians were exposed to radiation during atmospheric tests of atomic bombs between 1946 and 1963. An undetermined number of them are now ill or dead from diseases traceable to that exposure. In the early 1980s, some of the soldiers and civilians, or their survivors, brought damage suits against the private contractors that had helped the United States government carry out the tests. In 1984, Congress interfered with the judicial process by passing the Warner Amendment, which retroactively provided sovereign immunity to the contractors and required dismissal of the suits. Professor Fletcher shows that the Warner Amendment was passed for the specific purpose of requiring dismissal of the suits, thereby protecting the government and its contractors from the legal consequences of acts long since completed. Professor Fletcher then argues that the Warner Amendment\u27s intrusion into the judicial process violates the Separation of Powers

    The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy

    Get PDF

    An Appreciation of Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.

    Get PDF
    Thirty-four years is a long time in the life of a man, and even of our nation. I wish it had been longer

    Dissent

    Get PDF

    Dissent

    Get PDF

    Flame spread across liquid pools

    Get PDF
    For flame spread over liquid fuel pools, the existing literature suggests three gravitational influences: (1) liquid phase buoyant convection, delaying ignition and assisting flame spread; (2) hydrostatic pressure variation, due to variation in the liquid pool height caused by thermocapillary-induced convection; and (3) gas-phase buoyant convection in the opposite direction to the liquid phase motion. No current model accounts for all three influences. In fact, prior to this work, there was no ability to determine whether ignition delay times and flame spread rates would be greater or lesser in low gravity. Flame spread over liquid fuel pools is most commonly characterized by the relationship of the initial pool temperature to the fuel's idealized flash point temperature, with four or five separate characteristic regimes having been identified. In the uniform spread regime, control has been attributed to: (1) gas-phase conduction and radiation; (2) gas-phase conduction only; (3) gas-phase convection and liquid conduction, and most recently (4) liquid convection ahead of the flame. Suggestions were made that the liquid convection was owed to both vuoyancy and thermocapillarity. Of special interest to this work is the determination of whether, and under what conditions, pulsating spread can and will occur in microgravity in the absence of buoyant flows in both phases. The approach we have taken to resolving the importance of buoyancy for these flames is: (1) normal gravity experiments and advanced diagnostics; (2) microgravity experiments; and (3) numerical modelling at arbitrary gravitational level

    PRODUCER ACCEPTANCE OF A NEW PEANUT MARKETING COOPERATIVE: A SURVEY OF GEORGIA PEANUT PRODUCERS

    Get PDF
    Market conduct has become an important issue for peanut farmers. Consolidation in the first buyer market, increased imports, and political uncertainty have increased peanut producers' marketing risks. The purpose of this paper was to examine demographic differences in peanut producers' perceptions of the current marketing environment as well as their attitudes towards new marketing institutions. A standard t-test revealed that producers growing more than 250 acres of peanuts, irrigating at least 50 percent of their peanuts, and producers located in Southwest Georgia were statistically more dissatisfied with the current marketing environment and significantly more receptive to forming a new generation peanut cooperative.Agribusiness, Crop Production/Industries,
    • …
    corecore