What is John Latham’s Rose-fronted Parrot?

Funding Information: We are grateful to two reviewers whose comments substantially improved the submitted manuscript.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The tangled nomenclatural history of Haplopelia forbesi Salvadori, 1904 : Were Forbes and Robinson right all along?

Acknowledgements: Alex Bond (NHMUK) and Rachel Petts (Manchester Museum) provided information about the only other specimen known to have been identified as Haplopelia forbesi. We are grateful to Martim Melo and Luís Lima Valente for access to Hugo José Eira Pereira's M.Sc. thesis and information about recent Lemon Dove samples collected in the Gulf of Guinea. We are indebted to Peter Jones for invaluable comments on the manuscript. Robert Prŷs-Jones, Alan Tye and an anonymous reviewer provided very helpful suggestions on the submitted draft.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

Funder: NCI U24CA211006Abstract: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts