240 research outputs found
ORGANIZATIONAL REFORM AND THE EXPANSION OF THE SOUTHâS VOICE AT THE FUND
What organizational reforms might increase the influence of developing member countries within the International Monetary Fund? In this paper we argue that a variety of organizational changes are both feasible and could substantially increase the ability of developing countries to articulate policy alternatives and advance change. We focus particularly on changes in the recruitment, training, career paths and deployment of the Fundâs staff. Our recommendations address two general issues. First, we explore ways to diversify the âintellectual portfolioâ of the staff by drawing more effectively on hands-on knowledge of the concrete circumstances that shape policy outcomes in the South. More mid-career hiring of staff with practical experience inside developing country institutions could increase the degree to which the distinctive institutional circumstances of developing members are taken into account in formulating Fund policies and implementing them. Allocating a larger share of the Fundâs resources to research consulting contracts for researchers and institutions based in developing countries could also expand input of ideas that reflect the experience of member countries from the South. Second, large asymmetries in workload currently make it difficult for those working on the needs of developing members to formulate and advocate alternative policies. We suggest a number of ways in which even modest reallocation and addition of staff resources might create breathing space that would allow Executive Directors from developing countries to play a larger role in shaping the Fundâs policies.
DinĂąmicas de Norma Internacional e mudança polĂtica
PreocupaçÔes normativas e ideacionais sempre permearam o estudo da polĂtica internacional, e sĂŁo uma linha consistente na revista International Organization. Quando a IO foi fundada, as visĂ”es realistas dominantes da polĂtica, embora rejeitassem o idealismo, estavam muito preocupadas com questĂ”es relativas a legitimidade e ideologia. O inĂcio da Guerra Fria, afinal de contas, nĂŁo era simplesmente um conflito de posiçÔes entre grandes potĂȘncias anĂŽnimas: era uma guerra por "coraçÔes e mentes". A combinação de poder e um âpropĂłsito social legĂtimo" era central para a polĂtica externa norte-americana desse perĂodo.  Ao mesmo tempo, os pesquisadores de relaçÔes internacionais estavam estudando dois dos maiores projetos de construção social do perĂodo: a integração europeia e a descolonização. Os neofuncionalistas, assim como os realistas, estavam conscientemente tentando se afastar dos predecessores âidealistasâ (nesse caso, David Mitrany e seus colegas), mas a rede complexa de tarefas tĂ©cnicas que eles delinearam almejava mais do que promover bem-estar material: visava, em Ășltima instĂąncia, fins ideacionais e sociais. O efeito spillover deveria fazer mais do que criar tarefas tĂ©cnicas adicionais; ele deveria mudar atitudes, identidades e afetos entre os participantes. Da mesma forma, os estudiosos reconheciam que a descolonização foi impulsionada por uma agenda profundamente normativa, a qual explicitamente procurou reconstituir as identidades tanto dos novos Estados e de seus antigos colonizadores, como as relaçÔes entre eles
Convergence towards a European strategic culture? A constructivist framework for explaining changing norms.
The article contributes to the debate about the emergence of a European strategic culture to underpin a European Security and Defence Policy. Noting both conceptual and empirical weaknesses in the literature, the article disaggregates the concept of strategic culture and focuses on four types of norms concerning the means and ends for the use of force. The study argues that national strategic cultures are less resistant to change than commonly thought and that they have been subject to three types of learning pressures since 1989: changing threat perceptions, institutional socialization, and mediatized crisis learning. The combined effect of these mechanisms would be a process of convergence with regard to strategic norms prevalent in current EU countries. If the outlined hypotheses can be substantiated by further research the implications for ESDP are positive, especially if the EU acts cautiously in those cases which involve norms that are not yet sufficiently shared across countries
Recommended from our members
The diffusion of financial supervisory governance ideas
Who is watching the financial services industry? Since 1980, there have been multiple waves of thought about whether the ministry of finance, the central bank, a specialized regulator or some combination of these should have supervisory authority. These waves have been associated with the convergence of actual practices. How much and through what channels did internationally promoted ideas about supervisory 'best practice' influence institutional design choices? I use a new dataset of 83 countries and jurisdictions between the 1980s and 2007 to examine the diffusion of supervisory ideas. With this data, I employ Cox Proportional Hazard and Competing Risks Event History Analyses to evaluate the possible causal roles best practice policy ideas might have played. I find that banking crises and certain peer groups can encourage policy convergence on heavily promoted ideas
Pragmatism over principle: US intervention and burden shifting in Somalia, 1992â1993
The conventional wisdom about the 1992 US intervention in Somalia is that it was a quintessentially humanitarian mission pushed by President George H. W. Bush. This article challenges that interpretation, drawing on newly declassified documents. The Somalia intervention, I argue, was largely a pragmatic response to concerns held by the US military. In late 1992, as the small UN mission in Somalia was collapsing, senior American generals worried about being drawn into the resulting vacuum. Hence they reluctantly recommended a robust US intervention, in the expectation that this would allow the UN to assemble a larger peacekeeping force that would take over within months. The intervention ultimately failed, but the military learned useful lessons from this experience on how to achieve smoother UN handoffs in the future and thus effectively shift longer-term stabilisation burdens to the international community.Open access publication was made possible by an EC Career Integration Grant
The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.
Do international organizations really do what their creators intend them to do? In the past century the number of international organizations (1Os) has increased exponentially, and we have a variety of vigorous theories to explain why they have been created. Most of these theories explain IO creation as a response to problems of incomplete information, transaction costs, and other barriers to Pareto efficiency and welfare improvement for their members. Research flowing from these theories, however, has paid little attention to how IOs actually behave after they are created. Closer scrutiny would reveal that many IOs stray from the efficiency goals these theories impute and that many IOs exercise power autonomously in ways unintended and unanticipated by states at their creation. Understanding how this is so requires a reconsideration of IOs and what they do. In this article we develop a constructivist approach rooted in sociological institutionalism to explain both the power of IOs and their propensity for dysfunctional, even pathological, behavior. Drawing on long-standing Weberian arguments about bureaucracy and sociological institutionalist approaches to organizational behavior, we argue that the rational-legal authority that IOs embody gives them power independent of the states that created them and channels that power in particular directions. Bureaucracies, by definition, make rules, but in so doing they also create social knowledge. They define shared international tasks (like "development"), create and define new categories of actors (like "refugee"), create new interests for actors (like "promoting human rights"), and transfer models of political organization around the world (like markets and democracy.) However, the same normative valuation on impersonal, generalized rules that defines bureaucracies and makes them powerful in We are grateful t
- âŠ