Membranas electrohiladas de doble acción para tratamiento de agua

Número de publicación: 2 663 129 Número de solicitud: 201600852 51 Int. CI.: B01D 61/00 (2006.01) C02F 1/44 (2006.01)Membranas electrohiladas de doble acción para tratamiento de agua. La presente invención consiste en un procedimiento para la fabricación de membranas activas basadas en fibras submicrométricas que combinan una acción antimicrobiana con la capacidad de retención de contaminantes apolares en solución acuosa. Las membranas se producen mediante un procedimiento de electrohilado en disolución acuosa a partir de mezclas de un poliácido y un polialcohol solubles en agua que se estabilizan mediante un procedimiento de curado y se post-funcionalizan mediante la incorporación de dendrímeros con terminación amino mediante un procedimiento de injertado can ayuda de un agente de acoplamiento. La aplicación del material es la producción de membranas o componentes de membranas multicapa para tratamiento de agua con acción antimicrobiana y con capacidad para retener contaminantes apolares.Universidad de Almerí

Image guided SBRT for multiple liver metastases with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating

AimTo report the outcome and toxicity of sequential stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for multiple liver metastases in patients treated with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating.BackgroundIn selected patients with a limited number of liver metastases, SBRT has been evaluated as a safe and effective treatment, with minimal toxicity and high rates of local control.Materials and methodsFrom April 2008 to October 2013, 21 patients with multiple (3–14) liver metastases (n[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]101) were treated sequentially with SBRT at our institution. Maximum tumor diameter was 7.5[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm. Prior to treatment, internal markers were placed inside or near the tumor. CT or PET-CT simulation was used for the definition of gross tumor volume (GTV). Median planning target volume was 32.3[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cc (3.6–139.3[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cc). Treatment consisted of 3 fractions (12–20[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy/fraction) or 5 fractions (10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy/fraction), prescribed to the 90–95% of the PTV volume. Daily intra-fraction image guidance was performed with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating. Regular follow-up included CT or PET-CT imaging.ResultsAfter a median of 23.2 months, the estimated local control rate was 94.4%, 80.6%, 65% and 65% after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years; the median overall survival was 62 months (95% CI 49.12–74.87) and the actuarial survival reached at 60 months was 57.6%. The univariate data analysis revealed that only primary histology other than colorectal adenocarcinoma was shown as an independent significant prognostic factor for local control (p[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.022). Number of treated metastases did not modify significantly the overall survival (p[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.51). No toxicity higher than G3 (1 patient with chest wall pain) and no radiation-induced liver disease were observed.ConclusionsSequential SBRT with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating for multiple liver metastases can be considered an effective, safe therapeutic option, with a low treatment-related toxicity. Excellent rates of local control and survival were obtained

Local control rates in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung metastases associated with the biologically effective dose

AimTo evaluate dose differences in lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and the correlation with local control, regarding the dose algorithm, target volume and tissue density.BackgroundSeveral studies showed excellent local control rates in SBRT for lung metastases, with different fractionation schemes depending on the tumour location or size. These results depend on the dose distributions received by the lesions in terms of the tissue heterogeneity corrections performed by the dose algorithms.Materials and methodsForty-seven lung metastases treated with SBRT, using intrafraction control and respiratory gating with internal fiducial markers as surrogates (ExacTrac, BrainLAB AG), were calculated using Pencil Beam (PB) and Monte Carlo (MC) (iPlan, BrainLAB AG).Dose differences between both algorithms were obtained for the dose received by 99% (D99%) and 50% (D50%) of the planning treatment volume (PTV). The biologically effective dose delivered to 99% (BED99%) and 50% (BED50%) of the PTV were estimated from the MC results. Local control was evaluated after 24 months of median follow-up (range: 3–52 months).ResultsThe greatest variations (40.0% in ΔD99% and 38.4% in ΔD50%) were found for the lower volume and density cases. The BED99% and BED50% were strongly correlated with observed local control rates: 100% and 61.5% for BED99%>85Gy an

Could pulmonary low-dose radiation therapy be an alternative treatment for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia? Preliminary results of a multicenter SEOR-GICOR nonrandomized prospective trial (IPACOVID trial)

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lung low-dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) for pneumonia in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Materials and methods: Inclusion criteria comprised patients with COVID-19-related moderate-severe pneumonia warranting hospitalization with supplemental O2 and not candidates for admission to the intensive care unit because of comorbidities or general status. All patients received single lung dose of 0.5 Gy. Respiratory and systemic inflammatory parameters were evaluated before irradiation, at 24 h and 1 week after LD-RT. Primary endpoint was increased in the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) or the pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2) to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio of at least 20% at 24 h with respect to the preirradiation value. Results: Between June and November 2020, 36 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and a mean age of 84 years were enrolled. Seventeen were women and 19 were men and all of them had comorbidities. All patients had bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on chest X‑ray. All patients received dexamethasone treatment. Mean SpO2 pretreatment value was 94.28% and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio varied from 255 mm Hg to 283 mm Hg at 24 h and to 381 mm Hg at 1 week, respectively. In those who survived (23/36, 64%), a significant improvement was observed in the percentage of lung involvement in the CT scan at 1 week after LD-RT. No adverse effects related to radiation treatment have been reported. Conclusions: LD-RT appears to be a feasible and safe option in a population with COVID-19 bilateral interstitial pneumonia in the presence of significant comorbidities