Comparación en los resultados de pacientes con bronquiolitis manejados con dos diferentes métodos de administrar oxígeno. Informe preliminar de avance del Hospital General de Niños Dr. Pedro de Elizalde

Introducción: La oxigenoterapia en el tratamiento de niños con bronquiolitis puede ser administrada mediantes cánulas nasales con bajo o alto flujo (CNAF). Las CNAF podrían ser una alternativa a la ventilación no invasiva, requiriendo menos recursos que los cuidados intensivos (UCIP). Objetivo: Evaluar si existe diferencia en la proporción de sujetos hospitalizados por bronquiolitis que requiere UCIP o en la duración de su hospitalización, según oxigenoterapia (convencional o CNAF). Métodos: Estudio observacional incluyendo lactantes hospitalizados por bronquiolitis en los meses de junio a agosto de 2017. Los pacientes fueron tratados según el servicio donde se encontraban (las unidades 1, 2 y 3 con oxigenoterapia convencional, y las unidades 4 y 5 con CNAF), al que fueron asignados según disponibilidad de cama. Resultados: Se incluyeron 329 pacientes, con edad promedio de 7,2 meses, que permanecieron hospitalizados 5,9 días y recibieron 4,6 días de oxigenoterapia. Todos recibieron oxigenoterapia, 84 (25,5%) CNAF y 245 (74,5%) convencional. Sólo 10 (3,1%) requirieron UCIP. De los que ingresaron a UCIP 5/84 recibieron CNAF y 5/245 recibieron terapia convencional (OR: 3,1; IC 95%: 0,8-10,7; p=0,07). Los pacientes con CNAF permanecieron significativamente más tiempo hospitalizados (6,9 ± 3,9 días vs. 5,6 ±3,2; p=0,003), luego de controlar por edad, la etiología viral y requerimiento de UCIP. Conclusión: En la población analizada no se observó diferencia en la proporción de pacientes que requirieron UTIP según hubieran recibido oxigenoterapia por CNAF o en forma convencional.Background: Oxygen in bronchiolitis treatment can be delivered by nasal cannulas using low or high flow (HFNC). HFNC can be an alternative to non-invasive ventilation or intensive care (PICU). Objective: To evaluate PICU requirement and length of stay (LOS) according to oxygen delivery method in children hospitalized for bronchiolitis. Methods: Observational study including infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis from June to August 2017. Patients received oxygen based on to the unit in which they were hospitalized (units 1, 2 and 3 received conventional oxygen therapy, while units 4 and 5 received HFNC), assigned according to bed availability. Results: We included 329 patients, aged 7.2 months, with a LOS of 5.9 days, and receiving oxygen for 4.6 days. All of them received oxygen, 84 (25.5%) HFNC and 245 (74,5%) conventional therapy. Only 10 (3.1%) required PICU, 5 using HFNC and 5 on conventional therapy (OR: 3,1; 95%IC: 0.8-10.7; p=0.07). After controlling for age, viral etiology and PICU requirement, patients on HFNC showed a significantly longer LOS (6.9 ± 3.9 vs. 5.6 ± 3.2 days; p=0.003). Conclusion: Patients who received oxygen trough HFNC required PICU less frequently than those in conventional therapy but showed a longer length of stay.Fil: Potasnik, J.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Golubicki, A.. Ministerio de Salud de la Nación; ArgentinaFil: Fernandez, A.. Gobierno de la Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Agudos Carlos Durand.; ArgentinaFil: Raiden, Silvina Claudia. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay; ArgentinaFil: Sosa, R.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Gonzalez, N.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Cairoli, H.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: De Lillo, L.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Sanluis Fenelli, G.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Planovsky, H.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Checacci, E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Lopez, M.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Gigliotti, E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Torres, F.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Ferrero, F.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); Argentin

La rabbia nel mantenimento del legame affettivo

Questo breve intervento vuole mettere in evidenza alcuni processi osservabili nei legami conflittuali in cui lo “stare insieme” ed il “separarsi “ appaiono due poli tra cui la coppia oscilla nel mantenimento della relazione. Il litigio può sfociare in episodi di violenza ove la rabbia espressa invece che portare alla rottura del legame ne determina il mantenimento. L’osservazione di questi processi necessita nel professionista l’assunzione di una posizione terza in modo tale da poter cogliere non la responsabilità o la colpa dei contendenti ma “in che modo” essi stessi partecipano alla creazione e mantenimento della transazione

Setting e ciclo di vita del terapeuta

Seguendo il percorso di vita professionale e privata del terapeuta ed i cambiamenti del setting nel corso degli anni, si metterà in evidenza la reciprocità, facendo emergere la congruenza delle modificazioni e la loro interdipendenza. Aneddoti e fotografie saranno il filo conduttore della relazione

Cervical artery dissection: presentation and treatment

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a rare condition whereby a tear occurs in the intimal layer of the artery wall. This condition can determine stroke, peripheral symptoms or can be asymptomatic. Vascular surgeons are often involved in the treatment of this pathology and the present paper aims to overview the actual knowledge on this topic. Clinical studies and randomized trials were screened and analyzed through PubMed to report the incidence, the clinical manifestations and the treatment options of CeAD. CeAD involving extracranial internal carotid artery is most frequently involved (80%) rather than vertebral artery (15%) or carotid artery in association with vertebral artery (5%). Internal carotid dissection occurs in all age group and it is responsible for 2.5% of all strokes, and 40% of stroke in patients older than 50 years. Carotid artery dissection typically begins with local symptoms, such as a sudden onset of unilateral and constant headache or an ipsilateral neck pain or a partial Horner’s syndrome, followed by retinal or cerebral ischemia. Stroke associated with CeAD are present in 50-60% of symptomatic cases, even if many of CeAD are asymptomatic and therefore the real incidence of stroke associated with CeAD is difficult to establish. The risk of recurrent stroke after carotid artery dissection is less than 3%. Anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy are both associated with low-rate of symptoms recurrence (1-3%) at the follow-up. Surgical or endovascular therapy can be considered for patients with symptoms recurrence without benefit from medical therapy. CeAD is a possible cause of stroke, and it should be carefully investigated, particularly in young patients, in order to deliver an adequate therapeutic approach

The different effect of branches and fenestrations on early and long-term visceral vessel patency in complex aortic endovascular repair

Background: Aortic endovascular treatment with fenestrated or branched devices (f/bEVAR) requires a connection between the aortic graft and the visceral vessel (VV). However, data on the perioperative and long-term fate of the VVs remain scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate the VV loss (VVL) according to the type of revascularization performed (fenestrations vs branched) and the necessity for adjunctive visceral procedures (AVPs). Methods: From 2012 to 2017, all f/bEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PAAAs), and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) were considered. The perioperative VVL, AVPs, and graft configuration were considered and evaluated during the follow-up period. Results: In 158 patients, 523 VVs were considered, 140 (26%) in JAAAs, 165 (32%) in PAAAs, and 218 (42%) in TAAAs. Branches were used for 114 vessels (52%) in TAAAs, 8 (5%) in PAAAs, and 0 (0%) in JAAAs. The overall perioperative VVL was 20 (3.8%) and was significantly greater in TAAAs than in PAAAs or JAAAs (6.4% vs 2.4% vs 1.4%; P =.03). The branches resulted in greater perioperative VVL compared with fenestration (9% [11 of 122] vs 2% [9 of 401]; P =.0001). A significant VVL difference between the branches and fenestrations was identified selectively only for the renal arteries: 11 of 52 (21%) vs 6 of 224 (2.5%; P =.001). The results of the multivariate analysis confirmed the independent greater risk of VVL for branches and renal arteries (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 12.5-1.7; P =.04; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 52.6-1.05; P =.05, respectively). AVPs were performed in 43 VVs (8.2%) because of dissection (n = 2; 0.4%), stenosis (m = 3; 0.6%), bleeding (n = 3; 0.6%), or kinking between the bridging stent graft and the VV (n = 35; 7%). A significant difference between the branches and fenestrations was seen only for kinking between the bridging stent graft and VV (12% [15 of 112] vs 5% [20 of 401]; P =.005). At 5 years, the incidence of VVL was 2% \ub1 1%. The fenestrations had significantly greater freedom from VVL compared with the branches (100% vs 87% \ub1 6%; P =.04), which was confirmed selectively for TAAAs (100% vs 87% \ub1 6%; P =.04). The use of AVPs did not affect long-term visceral patency. Conclusions: Early and late VVL was infrequent in complex aortic procedures but seemed to occur more frequently in branches than in fenestration, especially for renal arteries. AVPs were often required to correct artery kinking but this did not affect the long-term patency