Genetic load and adaptive potential of a recovered avian species that narrowly avoided extinction

High genetic diversity is often a good predictor of long-term population viability, yet some species persevere despite having low genetic diversity. Here we study the genomic erosion of the Seychelles paradise flycatcher (Terpsiphone corvina), a species that narrowly avoided extinction after having declined to 28 individuals in the 1960s. The species recovered unassisted to over 250 individuals in the 1990s and was downlisted from Critically Endangered to Vulnerable in the IUCN Red List in 2020. By comparing historical, pre-bottleneck (130+ years old) and modern genomes, we uncovered a 10-fold loss of genetic diversity. The genome shows signs of historical inbreeding during the bottleneck in the 1960s, but low levels of recent inbreeding after the demographic recovery. We show that the proportion of severely deleterious mutations has reduced in modern individuals, but mildly deleterious mutations have remained unchanged. Computer simulations suggest that the Seychelles paradise flycatcher avoided extinction and recovered due to its long-term small Ne. This reduced the masked load and made the species more resilient to inbreeding. However, we also show that the chronically small Ne and the severe bottleneck resulted in very low genetic diversity in the modern population. Our simulations show this is likely to reduce the species’ adaptive potential when faced with environmental change, thereby compromising its long-term population viability. In light of rapid global rates of population decline, our work highlights the importance of considering genomic erosion and computer modelling in conservation assessment

Sensory systems and transcriptional regulation in escherichia coli

In free-living bacteria, the ability to regulate gene expression is at the core of adapting and interacting with the environment. For these systems to have a logic, a signal must trigger a genetic change that helps the cell to deal with what implies its presence in the environment; briefly, the response is expected to include a feedback to the signal. Thus, it makes sense to think of genetic sensory mechanisms of gene regulation. Escherichia coli K-12 is the bacterium model for which the largest number of regulatory systems and its sensing capabilities have been studied in detail at the molecular level. In this special issue focused on biomolecular sensing systems, we offer an overview of the transcriptional regulatory corpus of knowledge for E. coli that has been gathered in our database, RegulonDB, from the perspective of sensing regulatory systems. Thus, we start with the beginning of the information flux, which is the signal's chemical or physical elements detected by the cell as changes in the environment; these signals are internally transduced to transcription factors and alter their conformation. Signals transduced to effectors bind allosterically to transcription factors, and this defines the dominant sensing mechanism in E. coli. We offer an updated list of the repertoire of known allosteric effectors, as well as a list of the currently known different mechanisms of this sensing capability. Our previous definition of elementary genetic sensory-response units, GENSOR units for short, that integrate signals, transport, gene regulation, and the biochemical response of the regulated gene products of a given transcriptional factor fit perfectly with the purpose of this overview. We summarize the functional heterogeneity of their response, based on our updated collection of GENSORs, and we use them to identify the expected feedback as part of their response. Finally, we address the question of multiple sensing in the regulatory network of E. coli. This overview introduces the architecture of sensing and regulation of native components in E.coli K-12, which might be a source of inspiration to bioengineering applications.Funding for this work came from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and by NIGMS-NIH grant numbers 5RO1GM131643 and 2R01GM077678. Funding for open access publication fees comes from NIGMS-NIH grant 5RO1GM131643. We acknowledge funding from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and by NIGMS-NIH grant numbers 5RO1GM131643 and 2R01GM07767