65 research outputs found

    Ruxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator's choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non-relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy

    Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole in hematology adults under posaconazole prophylaxis : influence of food intake

    No full text
    Posaconazole (PCZ) is given at 200 mg three times daily as a fungal prophylaxis in neutropenic hematologic malignancy patients. A relationship between exposure, plasma concentration, and efficacy is suggested. The objectives of this prospective study were to analyze the PCZ plasma concentration in hematology adults at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and factors that could have an impact on the PCZ plasma concentration. PCZ plasma concentrations were measured after 2, 7, 10, 14, and 21 days of PCZ prophylaxis. Factors such as gender, age, body weight, posology, treatment duration, mucositis, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and food intake were studied. Sixty-three patients were included, with a median age of 52 years (range 17-70) and a median weight of 75 kg (range 47-150). The median PCZ plasma concentration of the 63 patients ranged from 0.42 to 0.48 mg/L. At day 2, 30% of PCZ plasma concentration were under 0.35 mg/L, and at day 7, 74% were < 0.70 mg/L. PCZ plasma concentrations were not affected by gender, age, body weight, or treatment duration. We found that food intake had a high influence on PCZ plasma concentrations (p = 0.0049). PCZ was well tolerated. One patient has developed a probable IFI, probably related to a low exposure to PCZ. PCZ therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential in order to early detect patients with low concentrations, to assess the etiology of such results, and to decide on the treatment strategy to apply
    corecore