9 research outputs found

    PKO: alternative method for isolating mycobacteria from sputum PKO: um método alternativo para o isolamento de micobactérias em amostras de escarro

    Get PDF
    We elaborated an alternative culture method, which we denominated PKO (initials in tribute of respect to Petroff, Kudoh and Ogawa), for isolating Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), and to compare its performance with the Swab and Petroff methods. For the technique validation, sputum samples from patients suspected of pulmonary TB cases were examined by acid-fast microscopy (direct and concentrated smear), PKO, Swab and Petroff methods. We found that Petroff and PKO methods have parity in the effectiveness of M. tuberculosis isolation. However, by the PKO method, 65% of isolated strains were detected in a period of <FONT FACE=Symbol>&pound;</FONT>15 days, while by the Petroff method the best detection was in an interval of 16-29 days (71%). In positive smear samples, the average time of PKO isolation is only superior to the one related for Bactec 460TB. In conclusion, the exclusion of the neutralization stage of pH in the PKO reduces the manipulation of the samples, diminishes the execution time of the culture according to the Petroff method and facilitates the qualification of professionals involved in the laboratorial diagnosis of Tuberculosis.<br>Foi elaborado um método de cultivo alternativo, denominado por nós PKO (iniciais referentes à Petroff, Kudoh e Ogawa), para o isolamento do Mycobacterium tuberculosis em amostras de escarro para o diagnóstico da tuberculose pulmonar (TB). Para validação da técnica, amostras de escarro de pacientes suspeitos de TB foram submetidas aos métodos de baciloscopia (direta e pós-concentração), PKO, Swab e Petroff. A análise comparativa entre o método de Petroff e o PKO mostrou paridade de resultados em relação ao isolamento e número de colônias de M. tuberculosis. Porém, pelo método PKO, 65% das cepas isoladas foi detectada em um período <FONT FACE=Symbol>&pound;</FONT>15 dias, enquanto que pelo método de Petroff a melhor detecção ocorreu em um intervalo de 16-29 dias (71%). O tempo médio de isolamento pelo PKO é somente superior ao sistema comercial Bactec 460TB em amostras positivas na baciloscopia. A exclusão da etapa de neutralização de pH no método PKO reduz a manipulação das amostras, diminui o tempo de execução do cultivo em relação ao de Petroff e facilita o treinamento de profissionais que realizam o diagnóstico laboratorial da TB

    A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fecal Contamination and Inadequate Treatment of Packaged Water

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Background</p><p>Packaged water products provide an increasingly important source of water for consumption. However, recent studies raise concerns over their safety.</p><p>Objectives</p><p>To assess the microbial safety of packaged water, examine differences between regions, country incomes, packaged water types, and compare packaged water with other water sources.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles published in English, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Turkish, with no date restrictions were identified from online databases and two previous reviews. Studies published before April 2014 that assessed packaged water for the presence of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, thermotolerant or total coliforms were included provided they tested at least ten samples or brands.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 170 studies were included in the review. The majority of studies did not detect fecal indicator bacteria in packaged water (78/141). Compared to packaged water from upper-middle and high-income countries, packaged water from low and lower-middle-income countries was 4.6 (95% CI: 2.6–8.1) and 13.6 (95% CI: 6.9–26.7) times more likely to contain fecal indicator bacteria and total coliforms, respectively. Compared to all other packaged water types, water from small bottles was less likely to be contaminated with fecal indicator bacteria (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.17–0.58) and total coliforms (OR = 0.10, 95%CI: 0.05, 0.22). Packaged water was less likely to contain fecal indicator bacteria (OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.20, 0.62) compared to other water sources used for consumption.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Policymakers and regulators should recognize the potential benefits of packaged water in providing safer water for consumption at and away from home, especially for those who are otherwise unlikely to gain access to a reliable, safe water supply in the near future. To improve the quality of packaged water products they should be integrated into regulatory and monitoring frameworks.</p></div

    A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fecal Contamination and Inadequate Treatment of Packaged Water

    No full text

    Atlantic epiphyres: a data set of vascular and non-vascular epiphyte plants and lichens from the Atlantic Forest.

    Get PDF
    Epiphytes are hyper?diverse and one of the frequently undervalued life forms in plant surveys and biodiversity inventories. Epiphytes of the Atlantic Forest, one of the most endangered ecosystems in the world, have high endemism and radiated recently in the Pliocene. We aimed to (1) compile an extensive Atlantic Forest data set on vascular, non?vascular plants (including hemiepiphytes), and lichen epiphyte species occurrence and abundance; (2) describe the epiphyte distribution in the Atlantic Forest, in order to indicate future sampling efforts. Our work presents the first epiphyte data set with information on abundance and occurrence of epiphyte phorophyte species. All data compiled here come from three main sources provided by the authors: published sources (comprising peer?reviewed articles, books, and theses), unpublished data, and herbarium data. We compiled a data set composed of 2,095 species, from 89,270 holo/hemiepiphyte records, in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay, recorded from 1824 to early 2018. Most of the records were from qualitative data (occurrence only, 88%), well distributed throughout the Atlantic Forest. For quantitative records, the most common sampling method was individual trees (71%), followed by plot sampling (19%), and transect sampling (10%). Angiosperms (81%) were the most frequently registered group, and Bromeliaceae and Orchidaceae were the families with the greatest number of records (27,272 and 21,945, respectively). Ferns and Lycophytes presented fewer records than Angiosperms, and Polypodiaceae were the most recorded family, and more concentrated in the Southern and Southeastern regions. Data on non?vascular plants and lichens were scarce, with a few disjunct records concentrated in the Northeastern region of the Atlantic Forest. For all non?vascular plant records, Lejeuneaceae, a family of liverworts, was the most recorded family. We hope that our effort to organize scattered epiphyte data help advance the knowledge of epiphyte ecology, as well as our understanding of macroecological and biogeographical patterns in the Atlantic Forest. No copyright restrictions are associated with the data set. Please cite this Ecology Data Paper if the data are used in publication and teaching events.Made available in DSpace on 2019-10-30T18:12:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2019AnneteEcologyAtlanticEpiphytes.pdf: 6789870 bytes, checksum: ce2df25be3ecfcfb4b9744110f8fb4fd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019bitstream/item/197486/1/2019-Annete-Ecology-Atlantic-Epiphytes.pd
    corecore