Social position, social ties and adult’s oral health: 13 year cohort study

Objectives This study explored different pathways by which social position and social ties influence adult’s oral health over a 13-year period. Methods A cohort investigation (Pro-Saúde Study) was conducted of non-faculty civil servants at a university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (N = 1613). Baseline data collected in 1999 included age, social position, social ties, and access to dental care. Psychological factors and smoking were assessed in 2001, whereas tooth loss and self-rated oral health (SROH) were collected in 2012. A hypothesised model exploring different direct and indirect pathways was developed and tested using structural equation modelling. Results The model was a good fit to the data and accounted for 40% and 27% of the variance in tooth loss and SROH, respectively. A greater social position was linked to more social ties (β = 0.31), health insurance (β = 0.48), low psychological distress (β = 0.07), less smoking (β = −0.21), more regular dental visiting (β = 0.30), less tooth loss (β = −0.44) and better SROH (β = −0.25) over time. Social position (β = 0.0005) and social ties (β = −0.0015) were linked indirectly with psychological distress, smoking and tooth loss. Social position was linked indirectly with social ties, psychological distress and SROH (β = −0.0071). Conclusions Poor social position and weak social ties were important predictors for tooth loss and poor SROH in adults over the 13-year period. Direct and indirect pathways via psychological factors and smoking on the aforementioned relationships were identified, suggesting different areas of intervention to promote adults’ oral health. Clinical significance Adult’s oral health is influenced by social conditions through direct and indirect pathways, including via psychological factors and smoking

População-alvo e freqüência da detecção do câncer de colo uterino

Palestra apresentada na reunião de consenso intitulada Consenso: Periodicidade e Faixa Etária no Exame de Prevenção do Câncer Cérvico-Uterino. Evento organizado pelo Ministério da Saúde, devido à necessidade de definição de alguns parâmetros e normas da política de controle de câncer cérvico-uterino no Brasil, reforçando os aspectos consensuais dessa política

Pattern evolution of antidepressants and benzodiazepines use in a cohort

OBJECTIVE: In recent decades there has been an increase in the use of antidepressants (AD) and a decrease in the use of benzodiazepines (BDZ). Prevalence, cumulative incidence, and factors associated with the incidence of AD and BDZ use in a Brazilian population were estimated in this article. METHODS: Data were collected with a self-administered questionnaire in a cohort of employees from a university in Rio de Janeiro. The prevalence of the use of AD and BDZ was calculated for 1999 (4,030), 2001 (3,574), 2006-07 (3,058), and 2012 (2,933). The cumulative incidences of the use of AD and BDZ between 1999 and 2007 were estimated by the Poisson models with robust variance estimates. RESULTS: In 1999, the prevalence of the use of AD and BDZ were 1.4% (95%CI: 1.1–1.8) and 4.7% (95%CI: 4.1–5.4), respectively; in 2012, they were 5.4% (95%CI: 5.5–6.2) and 6.8% (95%CI: 6.0–7.8). The incidence of use, between 1999 and 2007, was 4.9% (95%CI: 4.2–5.7) for AD and 8.3% (95%CI: 7.3–9.3) for BDZ. The incidences of AD and BDZ use were higher among women and participants with a positive General Health Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: In this population, the increase in the use of AD was not accompanied by a decrease in the use of BDZ, showing the prescriptions for psychotropic medication do not follow the currently recommended guidelines for treatment of common mental health disorders

Sociodemographic and health profile of asylum-seekers in Rio de Janeiro, 2016–2017

OBJECTIVE To analyze the sociodemographic profile and self-reported health conditions of asylum-seekers in Rio de Janeiro. METHODS A cross-sectional study of secondary data, collected from asylum claims forms completed in 2016 and 2017, at Cáritas Arquidiocesana do Rio de Janeiro (Cáritas-RJ). Descriptive analyses were performed and absolute and relative frequencies and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS Claims completed by 818 asylum-seekers from 49 different countries were identified, of whom 126 (20.3%) were stateless, 510 (62.7%) were male, 797 (97.4%) were adults, with a mean age of 30.5 years, 551 (73.5%) were single, 340 (44.1%) had higher education, and 27 (4.0%) were unemployed in their country of origin before coming to Brazil. Fear of persecution for political opinion, violation of human rights, and risk of torture stood out among the reasons stated for requesting asylum. To reach Brazil, 629 (80.5%) traveled only by plane. Regarding health conditions, 216 (29.0%) reported having some symptom, disease or health problem, the most frequent being pain, vision problems, infectious diseases (including HIV/AIDS), and hypertension. Only 15 individuals (2.2%) reported being in some medical or psychological treatment; 42 (6.0%) reported visual impairments, 14 (2.0%) reported physical impairments and 4 (0.6%) hearing impairments. CONCLUSIONS Unlike other countries, where forced migrants with a low level of education enter clandestinely by sea or land, asylum-seekers residing in Rio de Janeiro between 2016 and 2017 were mostly adults with higher education who migrated using air transport. They had primary care-sensitive health conditions that could be treated via access to public primary health care services.OBJETIVO Analisar o perfil sociodemográfico e as condições de saúde autorrelatadas por solicitantes de refúgio no Rio de Janeiro. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal de dados secundários, coletados de formulários de solicitação de refúgio preenchidos em 2016 e 2017, na Cáritas Arquidiocesana do Rio de Janeiro (Cáritas-RJ). Foram realizadas análises descritivas e calculadas frequências absolutas, relativas e intervalos de 95% de confiança. RESULTADOS Foram identificados formulários preenchidos por 818 solicitantes de refúgio, originários de 49 países diferentes, dos quais 126 (20,3%) eram apátridas, 510 (62,7%) do sexo masculino, 797 (97,4%) adultos, com idade média de 30,5 anos, 551 (73,5%) solteiros, 340 (44,1%) com ensino superior e 27 (4,0%) desempregados no país de origem antes da vinda para o Brasil. Entre os motivos declarados para solicitação de refúgio, destacaram-se o temor de perseguição por opinião política, violação de direitos humanos e risco de tortura. Para chegar ao Brasil, 629 (80,5%) viajaram somente de avião. Em relação às condições de saúde, 216 (29,0%) afirmaram ter algum sintoma, doença ou agravo em saúde, sendo as mais frequentes dores, problemas de visão, doenças infecciosas (incluindo HIV/aids) e hipertensão. Apenas 15 indivíduos (2,2%) relataram estar em algum tratamento médico ou psicológico; 42 (6,0%) relataram deficiências visuais, 14 (2,0%) relataram deficiências físicas e 4 (0,6%) deficiências auditivas. CONCLUSÕES Diferentemente de outros países, onde migrantes forçados de baixo grau de instrução entram por vias clandestinas marítimas ou terrestres, os solicitantes de refúgio residentes no Rio de Janeiro entre 2016 e 2017, eram, em sua maioria, adultos com ensino superior que migraram usando transporte aéreo. Apresentavam condições de saúde sensíveis à atenção primária que poderiam ser tratadas via acesso aos serviços públicos da atenção primária em saúde

Discriminação explícita e saúde: desenvolvimento e propriedades psicométricas de um instrumento

OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to assess discrimination effects on health outcomes and behaviors, capable of distinguishing harmful differential treatment effects from their interpretation as discriminatory events. METHODS: Successive versions of an instrument were developed based on a systematic review of instruments assessing racial discrimination, focus groups and review by a panel comprising seven experts. The instrument was refined using cognitive interviews and pilot-testing. The final version of the instrument was administered to 424 undergraduate college students in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, in 2010. Structural dimensionality, two types of reliability and construct validity were analyzed. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis corroborated the hypothesis of the instrument's unidimensionality, and seven experts verified its face and content validity. The internal consistency was 0.8, and test-retest reliability was higher than 0.5 for 14 out of 18 items. The overall score was higher among socially disadvantaged individuals and correlated with adverse health behaviors/conditions, particularly when differential treatments were attributed to discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the validity and reliability of the instrument developed. The proposed instrument enables the investigation of novel aspects of the relationship between discrimination and health.OBJETIVO: Desarrollar instrumento para evaluar los efectos de experiencias discriminatorias sobre condiciones y comportamientos en salud, distinguiendo efectos patológicos de la exposición a tratamientos diferenciales de su interpretación como eventos discriminatorios. MÉTODOS: Versiones sucesivas del instrumento fueron elaboradas con base en una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre escalas de discriminación, grupos focales y apreciación por un panel de siete especialistas. El refinamiento del instrumento fue alcanzado por medio de entrevistas cognitivas y estudio piloto, de modo que la versión final fue aplicada en 424 estudiantes de pregrado en Rio de Janeiro, sureste de Brasil, en 2010. La estructura dimensional, dos tipos de confiabilidad y validez del constructo fueron evaluadas. RESULTADOS: El análisis factorial exploratorio corroboró la hipótesis de unidimensionalidad del instrumento y siete especialistas indicaron que el presentaba validez de orientación y contenido. La consistencia interna fue de 0,8 y la confiabilidad de la prueba y re-evaluación fue mayor a 0,5 para 14 de los 18 itens. El escore general fue más alto en individuos socialmente desafortunados y se asoció con comportamientos/condiciones de salud adversos, especialmente al considerarse tratamientos atribuidos a la discriminación. CONCLUSIONES: Estos resultados sugieren validez y confiabilidad del instrumento desarrollado. La escala presentada permitirá investigar aspectos innovadores de las relaciones entre discriminación y salud.OBJETIVO: Desenvolver instrumento para avaliar os efeitos de experiências discriminatórias sobre condições e comportamentos em saúde, capaz de distinguir efeitos patológicos da exposição a tratamentos diferenciais de sua interpretação como eventos discriminatórios. MÉTODOS: Versões sucessivas do instrumento foram elaboradas com base em uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre escalas de discriminação, grupos focais e apreciação por um painel de sete especialistas. O refinamento do instrumento foi atingido por meio de entrevistas cognitivas e estudo-piloto, de modo que sua versão final foi aplicada em 424 estudantes de graduação no Rio de Janeiro, RJ, em 2010. A estrutura dimensional, dois tipos de confiabilidade e validade de construto foram avaliadas. RESULTADOS: A análise fatorial exploratória corroborou a hipótese de unidimensionalidade do instrumento e sete especialistas indicaram que este apresentava validade de face e conteúdo. A consistência interna foi de 0,8 e a confiabilidade teste-reteste foi maior do que 0,5 para 14 dos 18 itens. O escore foi estatisticamente mais alto em indivíduos socialmente desprivilegiados e associou-se com comportamentos/condições de saúde adversos, especialmente quando tratamentos atribuídos à discriminação foram considerados. CONCLUSÕES: Estes resultados sugerem validade e confiabilidade do instrumento desenvolvido. A escala apresentada permitirá investigar aspectos inovadores das relações entre discriminação e saúde

Breastfeeding duration and associated factors between 1960 and 2000

AbstractObjectiveTo describe a historical series on the median duration of breastfeeding in a population of mothers whose children were born from the 1960s onwards, identifying factors associated with the interruption of breastfeeding in each decade.MethodsData were analyzed from the Pró-Saúde Study, a longitudinal epidemiological investigation started in 1999 among technical and administrative employees of a university in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Breastfeeding duration was collected in two study phases: Phase 1 (1999), and phase 4 (2011–2012). Of these, those who had at least one child and reported the duration of breastfeeding for the first child were selected (n=1539). To analyze the duration of breastfeeding, survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the effect of covariates on the duration of breastfeeding was estimated by Cox regression model.ResultsIt was found that the median duration of breastfeeding was higher in the 1990s and 2000s and lower in the 1970s, compared to the 1960s. In addition, there was an association between higher income and maternal age with breastfeeding interruption, which was focused in the 1970s.ConclusionThere was shorter duration of breastfeeding in the 1970s compared to the 1960s. Increased duration and prevalence of breastfeeding from the 1970s onwards coincided with the national trend and the promotion of this practice since 1980