Ultrasonographic evaluation of three approaches for botulinum toxin injection into tibialis posterior muscle in chronic stroke patients with equinovarus foot: An observational study

Spastic equinovarus (SEV) foot deformity is commonly observed in patients with post-stroke spasticity. Tibialis posterior (TP) is a common target for botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) injection, as a first-line treatment in non-fixed SEV deformity. For this deep muscle, ultrasonographic guidance is crucial to achieving maximum accuracy for the BoNT-A injection. In current clinical practice, there are three approaches to target the TP: an anterior, a posteromedial, and a posterior. To date, previous studies have failed to identify the best approach for needle insertion into TP. To explore the ultrasonographic characteristics of these approaches, we investigated affected and unaffected legs of 25 stroke patients with SEV treated with BoNT-A. We evaluated the qualitative (echo intensity) and quantitative (muscle depth, muscle thickness, overlying muscle, subcutaneous tissue, cross-sectional area) ultrasound characteristics of the three approaches for TP injection. In our sample, we observed significant differences among almost all the parameters of the three approaches, except for the safety window. Moreover, our analysis showed significant differences in cross-sectional area between treated and untreated. Advantages and disadvantages of each approach were investigated. Our findings can thus provide a suitable reference for clinical settings, especially for novice operators

Methods for Drainage of Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after ERCP Failure: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

There is scarce evidence on the comparison between different methods for the drainage of distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. Therefore, we performed a network meta‐analysis to compare the outcomes of these techniques. We searched main databases through September 2021 and identified five randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was clinical success. The secondary outcomes were technical success, overall and serious adverse event rate. Percutaneous trans‐hepatic biliary drainage was found to be inferior to other interventions (PTBD: RR 1.01, 0.88– 1.17 with EUS‐choledochoduodenostomy (EUS‐CD); RR 1.03, 0.86–1.22 with EUS-hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HG); RR 1.42, 0.90–2.24 with surgical hepaticojejunostomy). The comparison between EUS‐HG and EUS‐CD was not significant (RR 1.01, 0.87–1.17). Surgery was not superior to other interventions (RR 1.40, 0.91–2.13 with EUS‐CD and RR 1.38, 0.88–2.16 with EUS‐HG). No difference in any of the comparisons concerning adverse event rate was detected, although PTBD showed a slightly poorer performance on ranking analysis (SUCRA score 0.13). In conclusion, all interventions seem to be effective for the drainage of DMBO, although PTBD showed a trend towards higher rates of adverse events

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a challenging medical problem that often negatively impacts the patient’s quality of life (QoL), postoperative complications, and survival rates. Endoscopic approaches to biliary drainage are generally performed by ERCP or, in selected cases, with a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Recent advances in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allow drainage where previous methods have failed. EUS has evolved from a purely diagnostic technique to one that allows a therapeutic approach in the event of ERCP failure in distal MBO. Moreover, the introduction of dedicated accessories and prostheses for EUS-guided transmural biliary drainage (EUS-BD) made these procedures more successful with regard to technical success, clinical outcomes and reduction of adverse events (AEs). Finally, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have improved the therapeutic role of the EUS. Subsequently, the electrocautery enhanced tip of the LAMS (EC-LAMS) allows a direct access of the delivery system to the target lumen, thereby simplifying and reducing the EUS-BD procedure time. EUS-BD using LAMS and EC-LAMS has proven effective and safe with a low rate of AEs. This review aims to evaluate biliary drainage techniques in malignant obstruction, focusing on the role of EUS biliary drainage by LAMS

Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration for lymph nodes tissue acquisition: A systematic review and meta-Analysis

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition represents the choice of methods for suspected lymph nodes (LNs) located next to the gastrointestinal tract. This study aimed to compare the pooled diagnostic performance of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for LNs sampling. Methods: We searched PubMed/MedLine and Embase databases through August 2021. Primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy; secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, sample adequacy, optimal histological core procurement, number of passes, and adverse events. We performed a pairwise meta-Analysis using a random-effects model. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference along with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: We identified nine studies (1,276 patients) in this meta-Analysis. Among these patients, 66.4% were male; the median age was 67 years. Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between the two approaches (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.81-2.10; P = 0.270). The accuracy of EUS-FNB was significantly higher when being performed with newer end-cutting needles (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.17-3.00; P = 0.009) and in abdominal LNs (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.52-4.05; P < 0.001) than that of EUS-FNA. No difference in terms of sample adequacy was observed between the two approaches (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.46-4.26; P = 0.550); however, histological core procurement and diagnostic sensitivity with EUS-FNB were significantly higher than those with EUS-FNA (OR, 6.15; 95% CI, 1.51-25.07; P = 0.010 and OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27-2.74, P = 0.001). The number of needle passes needed was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB group than in the EUS-FNA group (mean difference,-0.54; 95% CI,-0.97 to-0.12; P = 0.010). Conclusions: EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB perform similarly in LN sampling; however, FNB performed with end-cutting needles outperformed FNA in terms of diagnostic accuracy

Landscape of alcohol-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the last 15 years highlights the need to expand surveillance programs

Background & Aims: Alcohol abuse and metabolic disorders are leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Alcohol-related aetiology is associated with a worse prognosis compared with viral agents, because of the lower percentage of patients diagnosed with HCC under routine surveillance and a higher burden of comorbidity in alcohol abusers. This study aimed to describe the evolving clinical scenario of alcohol-related HCC over 15 years (2006–2020) in Italy. Methods: Data from the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) registry were used: 1,391 patients were allocated to three groups based on the year of HCC diagnosis (2006–2010; 2011–2015; 2016–2020). Patient characteristics, HCC treatment, and overall survival were compared among groups. Survival predictors were also investigated. Results: Approximately 80% of alcohol-related HCCs were classified as cases of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. Throughout the quinquennia, <50% of HCCs were detected by surveillance programmes. The tumour burden at diagnosis was slightly reduced but not enough to change the distribution of the ITA.LI.CA cancer stages. Intra-arterial and targeted systemic therapies increased across quinquennia. A modest improvement in survival was observed in the last quinquennia, particularly after 12 months of patient observation. Cancer stage, HCC treatment, and presence of oesophageal varices were independent predictors of survival. Conclusions: In the past 15 years, modest improvements have been obtained in outcomes of alcohol-related HCC, attributed mainly to underuse of surveillance programmes and the consequent low amenability to curative treatments. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is a widespread condition in alcohol abusers, but its presence did not show a pivotal prognostic role once HCC had developed. Instead, the presence of oesophageal varices, an independent poor prognosticator, should be considered in patient management and refining of prognostic systems. Impact and Implications: Alcohol abuse is a leading and growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide and is associated with a worse prognosis compared with other aetiologies. We assessed the evolutionary landscape of alcohol-related HCC over 15 years in Italy. A high cumulative prevalence (78%) of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, with signs of metabolic dysfunction, was observed in HCC patients with unhealthy excessive alcohol consumption. The alcohol + metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease condition tended to progressively increase over time. A modest improvement in survival occurred over the study period, likely because of the persistent underuse of surveillance programmes and, consequently, the lack of improvement in the cancer stage at diagnosis and the patients’ eligibility for curative treatments. Alongside the known prognostic factors for HCC (cancer stage and treatment), the presence of oesophageal varices was an independent predictor of poor survival, suggesting that this clinical feature should be carefully considered in patient management and should be included in prognostic systems/scores for HCC to improve their performance

Material deprivation affects the management and clinical outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma in a high-resource environment

none94Aim: This study investigated how material deprivation in Italy influences the stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at diagnosis and the chance of cure. Methods: 4114 patients from the Italian Liver Cancer database consecutively diagnosed with HCC between January 2008 and December 2018 were analysed about severe material deprivation (SMD) rate tertiles of the region of birth and region of managing hospitals, according to the European Statistics on Income and Living Conditions. The main outcomes were HCC diagnosis modalities (during or outside surveillance), treatment adoption and overall survival. Results: In more deprived regions, HCC was more frequently diagnosed during surveillance, while the incidental diagnosis was prevalent in the least deprived. Tumour characteristics did not differ among regions. The proportion of patients undergoing potentially curative treatments progressively decreased as the SMD worsened. Consequently, overall survival was better in less deprived regions. Patients who moved from most deprived to less deprived regions increased their probability of receiving potentially curative treatments by 1.11 times (95% CI 1.03 to 1.19), decreasing their mortality likelihood (hazard ratio 0.78 95% CI 0.67 to 0.90). Conclusions: Socioeconomic status measured through SMD does not seem to influence HCC features at diagnosis but brings a negative effect on the chance of receiving potentially curative treatments. Patient mobility from the most deprived to the less deprived regions increased the access to curative therapies, with the ultimate result of improving survival.openCucchetti A.; Gramenzi A.; Johnson P.; Giannini E.G.; Tovoli F.; Rapaccini G.L.; Marra F.; Cabibbo G.; Caturelli E.; Gasbarrini A.; Svegliati-Baroni G.; Sacco R.; Zoli M.; Morisco F.; Di Marco M.; Mega A.; Foschi F.G.; Biasini E.; Masotto A.; Nardone G.; Raimondo G.; Azzaroli F.; Vidili G.; Brunetto M.R.; Farinati F.; Trevisani F.; Avanzato F.; Biselli M.; Caraceni P.; Garuti F.; Neri A.; Santi V.; Pellizzaro F.; Imondi A.; Sartori A.; Penzo B.; Sanmarco A.; Granito A.; Muratori L.; Piscaglia F.; Sansone V.; Forgione A.; Dajti E.; Marasco G.; Ravaioli F.; Cappelli A.; Golfieri R.; Mosconi C.; Renzulli M.; Cela E.M.; Facciorusso A.; Cacciato V.; Casagrande E.; Moscatelli A.; Pellegatta G.; de Matthaeis N.; Allegrini G.; Lauria V.; Ghittoni G.; Pelecca G.; Chegai F.; Coratella F.; Ortenzi M.; Missale G.; Olivani A.; Inno A.; Marchetti F.; Busacca A.; Camma C.; Di Martino V.; Maria Rizzo G.E.; Franze M.S.; Saitta C.; Sauchella A.; Berardinelli D.; Bevilacqua V.; Borghi A.; Gardini A.C.; Conti F.; Dall'Aglio A.C.; Ercolani G.; Adotti V.; Arena U.; Di Bonaventura C.; Campani C.; Dragoni G.; Gitto S.; Laffi G.; Coccoli P.; Malerba A.; Guarino M.; Capasso M.; Oliveri F.; Romagnoli V.Cucchetti, A.; Gramenzi, A.; Johnson, P.; Giannini, E. G.; Tovoli, F.; Rapaccini, G. L.; Marra, F.; Cabibbo, G.; Caturelli, E.; Gasbarrini, A.; Svegliati-Baroni, G.; Sacco, R.; Zoli, M.; Morisco, F.; Di Marco, M.; Mega, A.; Foschi, F. G.; Biasini, E.; Masotto, A.; Nardone, G.; Raimondo, G.; Azzaroli, F.; Vidili, G.; Brunetto, M. R.; Farinati, F.; Trevisani, F.; Avanzato, F.; Biselli, M.; Caraceni, P.; Garuti, F.; Neri, A.; Santi, V.; Pellizzaro, F.; Imondi, A.; Sartori, A.; Penzo, B.; Sanmarco, A.; Granito, A.; Muratori, L.; Piscaglia, F.; Sansone, V.; Forgione, A.; Dajti, E.; Marasco, G.; Ravaioli, F.; Cappelli, A.; Golfieri, R.; Mosconi, C.; Renzulli, M.; Cela, E. M.; Facciorusso, A.; Cacciato, V.; Casagrande, E.; Moscatelli, A.; Pellegatta, G.; de Matthaeis, N.; Allegrini, G.; Lauria, V.; Ghittoni, G.; Pelecca, G.; Chegai, F.; Coratella, F.; Ortenzi, M.; Missale, G.; Olivani, A.; Inno, A.; Marchetti, F.; Busacca, A.; Camma, C.; Di Martino, V.; Maria Rizzo, G. E.; Franze, M. S.; Saitta, C.; Sauchella, A.; Berardinelli, D.; Bevilacqua, V.; Borghi, A.; Gardini, A. C.; Conti, F.; Dall'Aglio, A. C.; Ercolani, G.; Adotti, V.; Arena, U.; Di Bonaventura, C.; Campani, C.; Dragoni, G.; Gitto, S.; Laffi, G.; Coccoli, P.; Malerba, A.; Guarino, M.; Capasso, M.; Oliveri, F.; Romagnoli, V

Editorial: bariatric surgery to reduce the risk of liver cancer—authors' reply

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Ramai et al and Pirola & Sookoian papers. To view these articles, visit an

Cancer registry study of malignant hepatic vascular tumors: hepatic angiosarcomas and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas

Background: Malignant vascular tumors (MVTs) are rare and often misdiagnosed due to wide range of clinical presentations, varied histology, and exquisite imagining features. We aim to characterize two different types of MVTs of the liver: hepatic angiosarcomas (HA) and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas (HEHE). Methods: Data on HA and HEHE between 1975 and 2016 were extracted from the SEER database and analyzed. Results: A total of 366 patients with HA were identified where 64.2% were male and 79% of White race. The median age at diagnosis was 64 ± 16.2 years. Distant metastasis was found in 24% of patients, regional disease in 22.1%, and localized disease in 21.3%. The median overall survival for HA was 2 months. For HEHE, 120 cases were identified, 32.5% were male and 80% of White race. The median age of diagnosis was 51 ± 16.8 years. Distant metastasis was found in 37.5% of patients, regional disease in 27.5%, and localized disease in 20%. The median overall survival was 182 months. Conclusion: Patients’ demographics such as race, age, and gender may assist in elucidating distinct subtypes of MVTs. HA is an aggressive tumor despite intervention. Patients with HEHE tumors have significantly better survival compared to patients with HA. Further studies are needed to deepen our knowledge about the histopathology of these tumors, the outcomes of liver transplantation as a therapeutic alternative, and available molecular targets for MVTs

Hierarchic interaction of factors associated with liver decompensation after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

MPORTANCE Liver resection is the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in well-compensated liver cirrhosis. Postoperative liver decompensation (LD) is the most representative and least predictable cause of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES To determine the hierarchy and interaction of factors associated with the risk for LD and to define applicable risk classes among surgical candidates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective review collected data from 543 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent hepatic resection for HCC from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2013, in a tertiary comprehensive cancer center. Final follow-up was completed on January 31, 2015, and data were assessed from February 1 to 28, 2015. MAJOR OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Preoperative prognostic factors and risk stratification for postoperative LD. Multivariate logistic regression was performed, and the independent risk factors for LD were included in a recursive partitioning analysis model. Results were validated by means of 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS The analysis included 543 patients, of whom 411 (75.7%) were male, 132 (24.3%) were female, and the median age was 68 (interquartile range, 62-73) years. An independent association with LD was found for major hepatectomy (odds ratio [OR], 2.41; 95% CI, 1.17-4.30; P = .01), portal hypertension (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.13-4.30; P = .01), and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score greater than 9 (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.10-4.58; P = .02). Recursive partitioning analysis confirmed portal hypertension as the most important factor (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.93-4.62; P < .001), followed by extension of hepatectomy with (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.85-4.77; P = .03) and without (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.97-4.52; P < .001) portal hypertension, and MELD score (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.23-2.13; P < .001). Low-risk patients (LD rate, 4.9%[11 of 226]) without portal hypertension underwent minor resection with a MELD score of 9 or less; intermediate-risk patients (LD rate, 28.6%[85 of 297]) had no portal hypertension and underwent major resections or, in case of minor resections, had portal hypertension or a MELD score greater than 9; and high-risk patients (LD rate, 60.0%[12 of 20]) underwent major resection with portal hypertension. Risk-class progression paralleled median length of stay (7, 8, and 11 days, respectively; P < .001) and liver-related mortality (4.4%[10 of 226], 9.0% [27 of 297], and 25.0%[5 of 20], respectively; P = .001). A 10-fold cross-validation of the model resulted in a C index of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82) and an overall error rate of 0.06. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The risk for postoperative LD after resection for HCC in chronic liver disease is associated with preoperative hierarchic interaction of portal hypertension, planned extension of hepatectomy, and the MELD score