32 research outputs found
Mandibular trauma treatment: a comparison of two protocols
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment of mandibular fractures treated in two European
centre in 10 years.
Study Design: This study is based on 2 systematic computer-assisted databases that have continuously recorded
patients hospitalized with maxillofacial fractures in two centers in Turin, Italy and in Amsterdam, the Netherlands
for ten years. Only patients who were admitted for mandibular fractures were considered for this study.
Results: Between 2001 and 2010, a total of 752 patients were admitted at Turin hospital with a total of 1167
mandibular fractures not associated with further maxillofacial fractures, whereas 245 patients were admitted at
Amsterdam hospital with a total of 434 mandibular fractures. At Amsterdam center, a total of 457 plates (1.5 - 2.7
mm) were used for the 434 mandibular fracture lines, whereas at Turin center 1232 plates (1.5 â 2.5 mm) were used
for the management of the 1167 mandibular fracture lines. At Turin center, 190 patients were treated primarily
with IMF, whereas 35 patients were treated with such treatment option at Amsterdam center.
Conclusions: Current protocols for the management of mandibular fractures are quite efficient. It is difficult to
obtain a uniform protocol, because of the difference of course of each occurring fracture and because of surgeonsâ
experiences and preferences. Several techniques can still be used for each peculiar fracture of the mandible
Quantum sensors for dynamical tracking of chemical processes
Quantum photonics has demonstrated its potential for enhanced sensing.
Current sources of quantum light states tailored to measuring, allow to monitor
phenomena evolving on time scales of the order of the second. These are
characteristic of product accumulation in chemical reactions of technologically
interest, in particular those involving chiral compounds. Here we adopt a
quantum multiparameter approach to investigate the dynamic process of sucrose
acid hydrolysis as a test bed for such applications. The estimation is made
robust by monitoring different parameters at once
Different Presentation and Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Advanced MRONJ in Oncological and Nononcological Patients Taking or Not Corticosteroid Therapy
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe side effect caused by antiangiogenic antiresorptive drugs used to treat various oncological and non oncological diseases. The clinical and radiological characteristics of MRONJ depend on the type of causative drug, the time of administration, and its dosage. Proven systemic risk factors like anemia, uncontrolled diabetes, corticosteroid therapy, and chemotherapy in neoplastic diseases (e.g., high doses of methotrexate up to 30âmg daily) significantly increase the chances of acquiring MRONJ. The risk factors themselves can affect treatment outcomes. Although the main scientific societies have recently disseminated good practice rules on the patient's prevention, diagnosis, and management, there are still no guidelines on shared therapeutic strategies. In general, if conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment is considered, including local debridement, osteoplasty, and marginal or segmental osteotomy. In literature, cohorts of heterogeneous patients with MRONJ have been analyzed for a long time, resulting in a lack of uniformity of information and difficulties interpreting the data. According to the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons criteria, this retrospective study evaluates the surgical treatment outcomes of 64 patients with stage II-III MRONJ, evaluated at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the University of Turin (Italy). The first objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate treatment results for stages II-III in all cases; the second objective is to evaluate the same results by dividing the sample into different cohorts of patients: first, based on the underlying pathology, i.e., oncological and non oncological, and secondly, based on the drug or combination of drugs they took
A multicentric, prospective study on oral and maxillofacial trauma in the female population around the world
Epidemiology; Female; Maxillofacial fracturesEpidemiologĂa; Mujer; Fracturas maxilofacialesEpidemiologia; Dona; Fractures maxil¡lofacialsBackground/Aims
Approximately 20% of patients with maxillofacial trauma are women, but few articles have analysed this. The aim of this multicentric, prospective, epidemiological study was to analyse the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in the female population managed in 14 maxillofacial surgery departments on five continents over a 1-year period.
Methods
The following data were collected: age (0â18, 19â64, or âĽ65 years), cause and mechanism of the maxillofacial fracture, alcohol and/or drug abuse at the time of trauma, fracture site, Facial Injury Severity Scale score, associated injury, day of trauma, timing and type of treatment, and length of hospitalization.
Results
Between 30 September 2019 and 4 October 2020, 562 of 2387 patients hospitalized with maxillofacial trauma were females (24%; M: F ratio, 3.2:1) aged between 1 and 96 years (median age, 37 years). Most fractures occurred in patients aged 20â39 years. The main causes were falls (43% [median age, 60.5 years]), which were more common in Australian, European and American units (p < .001). They were followed by road traffic accidents (35% [median age, 29.5 years]). Assaults (15% [median age, 31.5 years]) were statistically associated with alcohol and/or drug abuse (p < .001). Of all patients, 39% underwent open reduction and internal fixation, 36% did not receive surgical treatment, and 25% underwent closed reduction.
Conclusion
Falls were the main cause of maxillofacial injury in the female population in countries with ageing populations, while road traffic accidents were the main cause in African and some Asian centres, especially in patients â¤65 years. Assaults remain a significant cause of trauma, primarily in patients aged 19â64 years, and they are related to alcohol use
Difference in outcomes in surgical treatment of stage II-II MRONJ in oncological and non-oncological patients.
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe side effect caused by antiresorptive antiangiogenic medication for different pathologies. Although the main factors that seem to increase the risk of ONJ have been identified and the main scientific societies have recently disclosed rules of good behaviour regarding prevention, diagnosis and patient management, there are still no guidelines on therapeutic strategies to be adopted. In general, if conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment is considered, including local debridement, osteoplasty, and marginal or segmental osteotomy. To date, in literature, cohorts of heterogeneous patients with MRONJ have been analysed for a long time, with a lack of uniformity in information and difficulties in interpreting data. This retrospective study evaluates the results of surgical treatment of 62 patients with stage II-III of MRONJ according to the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons criteria, evaluated at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, in the University of Turin (Italy), by subdividing patients into different cohorts firstly according to the primary pathology, i,e. oncological and non-oncological, and secondly, according to the drug or combination of drugs taken
Characteristics and age-related injury patterns of maxillofacial fractures in children and adolescents: A multicentric and prospective study
Children; Epidemiology; Maxillofacial fracturesNiĂąos; EpidemiologĂa; Fracturas maxilofacialesNens; Epidemiologia; Fractures maxil¡lofacialsBackground/Aims
Paediatric maxillofacial trauma accounts for 15% of all maxillofacial trauma but remains a leading cause of mortality. The aim of this prospective, multicentric epidemiological study was to analyse the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in paediatric patients managed in 14 maxillofacial surgery departments on five continents over a 1-year period.
Methods
The following data were collected: age (preschool [0â6 years], school age [7â12 years], and adolescent [13â18 years]), cause and mechanism of the maxillofacial fracture, alcohol and/or drug abuse at the time of trauma, fracture site, Facial Injury Severity Scale score, associated injuries, day of the maxillofacial trauma, timing and type of treatment, and length of hospitalization. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software.
Results
Between 30 September 2019 and 4 October 2020, 322 patients (male:female ratio, 2.3:1) aged 0â18 years (median age, 15 years) were hospitalized with maxillofacial trauma. The most frequent causes of the trauma were road traffic accidents (36%; median age, 15 years), followed by falls (24%; median age, 8 years) and sports (21%; median age, 14 years). Alcohol and/or drug abuse was significantly associated with males (p < .001) and older age (p < .001). Overall, 474 fractures were observed (1.47 per capita). The most affected site was the mandibular condyle in children <13 years old and the nose in adolescents. The proportion of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation increased with age (p < .001).
Conclusion
The main cause of paediatric maxillofacial fractures was road traffic accidents, with the highest rates seen in African and Asian centres, and the frequency of such fractures increased with age. Falls showed an inverse association with age and were the leading cause of trauma in children 0â6 years of age. The choice of treatment varies with age, reflecting anatomical and etiological changes towards patterns more similar to those seen in adulthood.Open Access funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Torino within the CRUI-CARE Agreement
Manual versus rigid intraoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation in the surgical management of mandibular fractures:A European prospective analysis
Purpose: Intraoperative stabilisation of bony fragments with maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) is an essential step in the surgical treatment of mandibular fractures that are treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The MMF can be performed with or without wire-based methods, rigid or manual MMF, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the use of manual versus rigid MMF, in terms of occlusal outcomes and infective complications.
Materials and methods: This multi-centric prospective study involved 12 European maxillofacial centres and included adult patients (age âĽ16âyears) with mandibular fractures treated with ORIF. The following data were collected: age, gender, pre-trauma dental status (dentate or partially dentate), cause of injury, fracture site, associated facial fractures, surgical approach, modality of intraoperative MMF (manual or rigid), outcome (minor/major malocclusions and infective complications) and revision surgeries. The main outcome was malocclusion at 6âweeks after surgery.
Results: Between May 1, 2021 and April 30, 2022, 319 patients-257 males and 62 females (median age, 28âyears)-with mandibular fractures (185 single, 116 double and 18 triple fractures) were hospitalised and treated with ORIF. Intraoperative MMF was performed manually on 112 (35%) patients and with rigid MMF on 207 (65%) patients. The study variables did not differ significantly between the two groups, except for age. Minor occlusion disturbances were observed in 4 (3.6%) patients in the manual MMF group and in 10 (4.8%) patients in the rigid MMF group (pâ>â.05). In the rigid MMF group, only one case of major malocclusion required a revision surgery. Infective complications involved 3.6% and 5.8% of patients in the manual and rigid MMF group, respectively (pâ>â.05).
Conclusion: Intraoperative MMF was performed manually in nearly one third of the patients, with wide variability among the centres and no difference observed in terms of number, site and displacement of fractures. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative malocclusion among patients treated with manual or rigid MMF. This suggests that both techniques were equally effective in providing intraoperative MMF.</p
Characteristics and age-related injury patterns of maxillofacial fractures in children and adolescents:A multicentric and prospective study
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Paediatric maxillofacial trauma accounts for 15% of all maxillofacial trauma but remains a leading cause of mortality. The aim of this prospective, multicentric epidemiological study was to analyse the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in paediatric patients managed in 14 maxillofacial surgery departments on five continents over a 1âyear period. METHODS: The following data were collected: age (preschool [0â6 years], school age [7â12 years], and adolescent [13â18 years]), cause and mechanism of the maxillofacial fracture, alcohol and/or drug abuse at the time of trauma, fracture site, Facial Injury Severity Scale score, associated injuries, day of the maxillofacial trauma, timing and type of treatment, and length of hospitalization. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Between 30 September 2019 and 4 October 2020, 322 patients (male:female ratio, 2.3:1) aged 0â18 years (median age, 15 years) were hospitalized with maxillofacial trauma. The most frequent causes of the trauma were road traffic accidents (36%; median age, 15 years), followed by falls (24%; median age, 8 years) and sports (21%; median age, 14 years). Alcohol and/or drug abuse was significantly associated with males (p < .001) and older age (p < .001). Overall, 474 fractures were observed (1.47 per capita). The most affected site was the mandibular condyle in children <13 years old and the nose in adolescents. The proportion of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation increased with age (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The main cause of paediatric maxillofacial fractures was road traffic accidents, with the highest rates seen in African and Asian centres, and the frequency of such fractures increased with age. Falls showed an inverse association with age and were the leading cause of trauma in children 0â6 years of age. The choice of treatment varies with age, reflecting anatomical and etiological changes towards patterns more similar to those seen in adulthood