Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the evolution of form and function in the amniote jaw.

The amniote jaw complex is a remarkable amalgamation of derivatives from distinct embryonic cell lineages. During development, the cells in these lineages experience concerted movements, migrations, and signaling interactions that take them from their initial origins to their final destinations and imbue their derivatives with aspects of form including their axial orientation, anatomical identity, size, and shape. Perturbations along the way can produce defects and disease, but also generate the variation necessary for jaw evolution and adaptation. We focus on molecular and cellular mechanisms that regulate form in the amniote jaw complex, and that enable structural and functional integration. Special emphasis is placed on the role of cranial neural crest mesenchyme (NCM) during the species-specific patterning of bone, cartilage, tendon, muscle, and other jaw tissues. We also address the effects of biomechanical forces during jaw development and discuss ways in which certain molecular and cellular responses add adaptive and evolutionary plasticity to jaw morphology. Overall, we highlight how variation in molecular and cellular programs can promote the phenomenal diversity and functional morphology achieved during amniote jaw evolution or lead to the range of jaw defects and disease that affect the human condition

Human monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells are comparably effective in vitro in presenting HLA class I-restricted exogenous peptides.

Recent experimental data have shown that mice could be immunized efficiently, in particular against cancer, by the injection of antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) or macrophages (MPH). In the present work, these two antigen-presenting cells (APC) were prepared in humans from circulating mononuclear cells (MNC). MPH were obtained from MNC that were cultured in hydrophobic plastic bags and purified by elutriation. DC were from the culture of adherent elutriation-purified monocytes in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). The two APC were prepared in parallel from the same donors and their phenotype and antigen-presenting capacity were compared. DC differed from MPH by a higher expression of HLA-DR and CD23 and a lower expression of CD14, CD64 and of adhesion molecules. DC and MPH were comparably effective in (a) enhancing the mitotic response of autologous lymphocytes to immobilized anti-CD3 (accessory function); (b) presenting melanoma peptides to specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clones; and (c) stimulating the generation of CTL directed against a myxovirus influenza peptide. However, DC were more effective than MPH in inducing the mitotic response of allogeneic peripheral blood leucocytes (PBL), possibly because of their higher expression of HLA class II molecules. In conclusion, DC and MPH prepared from blood MNC did not differ substantially in their ability to activate HLA class I-restricted T-cell responses by exogenous peptide presentation

Diversity of the fine specificity displayed by HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL specific for the immunodominant Melan-A/MART-1 antigenic peptide

HLA-A*0201 melanoma patients often develop a CTL response to an immunodominant peptide derived from the melanocyte lineage-specific protein Melan-A/MART-1. We have shown previously that the antigenic peptide most often involved is the decapeptide Melan-A(26-35) (EAAGIGILTV). We also observed some clonal diversity in the fine specificity of Melan-A-specific CTL. To substantiate this observation, we have now tested a series of Melan-A(26-35) variant peptides containing single alanine substitutions for binding to HLA-A*0201 and recognition by polyclonal and monoclonal Melan-A-specific CTL. Substitution of several residues with alanine reduced peptide binding activity by > 10-fold. In contrast, substitution of E26 with alanine (AAAGIGILTV) resulted in a 5-fold higher binding activity as well as in stronger stability of the corresponding HLA-A*0201/peptide complexes. Interestingly, the peptide variant AAAGIGILTV was recognized more efficiently than the natural decapeptide by short term cultured, tumor-infiltrated lymph node cell cultures and a number of Melan-A-specific CTL clones derived from different individuals. Moreover, this analysis revealed that the fine specificity of the CTL response to the Melan-A immunodominant epitope is quite diverse at the clonal level. At least three distinct patterns of fine specificity were identified. This diversity appears to reflect the diversity of the TCR repertoire available for this Ag, since similar results were obtained with a panel of Melan-A-specific CTL clones derived from a single melanoma patient. These findings have important implications for the formulation of Melan-A peptide-based vaccines as well as for the monitoring of Melan-A-specific CTL responses in melanoma patients