Pathophysiology and Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia

International audienceDrug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a life-threatening clinical syndrome that is under-recognized and difficult to diagnose. Many drugs can cause immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, but the most commonly implicated are abciximab, carbamazepine, ceftriaxone, eptifibatide, heparin, ibuprofen, mirtazapine, oxaliplatin, penicillin, quinine, quinidine, rifampicin, suramin, tirofiban, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Several different mechanisms have been identified in typical DITP, which is most commonly characterized by severe thrombocytopenia due to clearance and/or destruction of platelets sensitized by a drug-dependent antibody. Patients with typical DITP usually bleed when symptomatic, and biological confirmation of the diagnosis is often difficult because detection of drug-dependent antibodies (DDabs) in the patient's serum or plasma is frequently not possible. This is in contrast to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is a particular DITP caused in most cases by heparin-dependent antibodies specific for platelet factor 4, which can strongly activate platelets in vitro and in vivo, explaining why affected patients usually have thrombotic complications but do not bleed. In addition, laboratory tests are readily available to diagnose HIT, unlike the methods used to detect DDabs associated with other DITP that are mostly reserved for laboratories specialized in platelet immunology

Acquired platelet defect associated with gabapentin treatment: a case-report

Gabapentin, a structural analog of gamma-aminobutyric acid, is used to treat peripheral neuropathic pain. Here we report the first case of platelet function disorder associated with gabapentin treatment in a 44-year-old woman without a history of bleeding. She presented with mucocutaneous bleeding approximately 1 month after initiation of gabapentin and platelet function tests showed no aggregation to arachidonic acid and epinephrine, a defective response to ADP and a slightly decreased response to collagen. Gabapentin’s imputability was supported by the fact that all platelet functions were normalized 6 days after drug discontinuation, with the simultaneous disappearance of bleedings

The use of 1E12, a monoclonal anti-platelet factor 4 antibody, to improve the diagnosis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia

International audienceBACKGROUND: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a complication of adenoviral-based vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 due to prothrombotic immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and may be difficult to distinguish from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients treated with heparin. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the usefulness of competitive anti-PF4 enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) in this context. METHODS: The ability of F(ab’)2 fragments of 1E12, 1C12, and 2E1, 3 monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies, to inhibit the binding of human VITT or HIT antibodies to PF4 was evaluated using EIAs. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis was performed to define the amino acids involved in the interactions between the monoclonal antibodies and PF4. RESULTS: A strong inhibition of VITT IgG binding to PF4 was measured with 1E12 (median inhibition, 93%; n = 8), whereas it had no effect on the binding of HIT antibodies (median, 6%; n = 8). In contrast, 1C12 and 2E1 inhibited VITT (median, 74% and 76%, respectively) and HIT antibodies (median, 68% and 53%, respectively) binding to PF4. When a competitive anti-PF4 EIA was performed with 1E12 for 19 additional VITT samples, it strongly inhibited IgG binding to PF4, except for 1 patient, who had actually developed HIT according to the clinical history. Epitope mapping showed that 1E12 interacts with 5 key amino acids on PF4, of which 4 are also required for the binding of human VITT antibodies, thus explaining the competitive inhibition. CONCLUSION: A simple competitive anti-PF4 EIA with 1E12 could help confirm VITT diagnosis and distinguish it from HIT in patients when both diagnoses are possible