VEGA, JOSÉ [Material gráfico]

Copia digital. Madrid : Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, 201

A numerical investigation on the fire response of a steel girder bridge

The response of bridges subject to fire is an under researched topic despite the number of bridge failures caused by fire. Since available data shows that steel girder bridges are especially vulnerable to fire, this paper delves into their fire response by analyzing with a 3D numerical model the response of a typical bridge of 12.20 m span length. A parametric study is performed considering: (1) two possibilities for the axial restraint of the bridge deck, (2) four types of structural steel for the girders (carbon steel and stainless steel grades 1.4301, 1.4401, and 1.4462), (3) three different constitutive models for carbon steel, (4) four live loads, and (5) two alternative fire loads (the hydrocarbon fire defined by Eurocode 1 and a fire corresponding to a real fire event). Results show that restraint to deck expansion coming from an adjacent span or abutment should be considered in the numerical model. In addition, times to collapse are very small when the bridge girders are built with carbon steel (between 8.5 and 18 min) but they can almost double if stainless steel is used for the girders. Therefore, stainless steel is a material to consider for steel girder bridges in a high fire risk situation, especially if the bridge is located in a corrosive environment and its aesthetics deserves special attention. The methodology developed in this paper and the results obtained are useful for researchers and practitioners interested in developing and applying a performance-based approach for the design of bridges against fire. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Funding for this research has been provided to Dr. Paya-Zaforteza by the Spanish Ministry of Education (contract number EX-2008-0669 of the Program for Postdoctoral Stays), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (research project BIA 2011-27104) and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Research and Development Support Program PAID-06-11). Funding has also been provided to Dr. Maria Garlock by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under award number CMMI-1068252. All opinions expressed in this paper are the authors' and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of the sponsors.Paya-Zaforteza, I.; Garlock, ME. (2012). A numerical investigation on the fire response of a steel girder bridge. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 75:93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.03.012S931037

The use of stainless steel in structures

The past 15 years have seen the introduction or major revision of structural stainless steel design codes throughout the world, and at the same time, interest in the use of stainless steel in construction has been accelerating. Historically the high initial material cost of stainless steel has limited its use primarily to specialist and prestige applications. However, the emergence of design codes, a better awareness of the additional benefits of stainless steel and a transition towards sustainability are bringing more widespread use into conventional structures. Although a number of similarities between stainless steel and ordinary carbon steel exist, there is sufficient diversity in their physical properties to require separate treatment in structural design. In addition to the straightforward differences in basic material properties (such as Young's modulus and yield strength), further fundamental differences exist, such as the nature of the stress–strain curve and the material's response to cold-work and elevated temperatures; these have implications at ultimate, serviceability and fire limit states. This paper describes the use of stainless steel as a structural material, discusses current structural design provisions, reviews recent research activities and highlights the important findings and developments

Robustness of beam-to-column end-plate moment connections with stainless steel bolts subjected to high rates of loading

This paper presents an experimental investigation into end-plate beam column connections for buildings. The work demonstrates that a fourfold increase in the energy absorbed to failure can be achieved by replacing carbon steel bolts with their stainless steel counterparts. Experimental tests were carried out under load control, and these provided the opportunity to observe the time required for connection fracture. Under quasi-static loading, connections tested with stainless steel bolts showed clearly visible signs of distress prior to failure, whereas the carbon-steel-bolted equivalents provided no warning of failure prior to brittle fracture. Experimental tests were carried out on bolts, and these showed strain rate–induced strength enhancements. End-plate connections were also tested under high strain rates. Loading rate was not observed to significantly affect the performance of stainless steel–bolted connections. However, carbon-steel–bolted connections were observed to weaken under high-strain rates; therefore, dynamically increased material properties did not always translate into increase connection strength. The design strengths predicted using Eurocode 3 were found to be in good agreement with the experimentally observed values under quasi-static loading for both bolt types. Under high-strain-rate conditions, the Eurocode 3 method was also found to provide a good prediction for stainless steel-bolted connections but was found to over predict for carbon-steel connections. The simple modification of replacing carbon-steel bolts with their stainless steel equivalents is shown to be an effective way of improving the performance of industry standard connections. This modification is of relevance to the design of buildings and other structures in which the ductility is of high importance; for example, in structures which may need to resist transient loads from blast or impact