Novel oral anticoagulants: focus on stroke prevention and treatment of venous thrombo-embolism

Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment and prevention of thrombo-embolic diseases as well as for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been accomplished by vitamin K antagonists for the last half century. Although effective under optimal conditions, the imminent risk of a recurrent event vs. the risk of bleeding due to the narrow therapeutic window, numerous food- and drug interactions, and the need for regular monitoring complicate the long-term use of these drugs and render treatment with these agents complicated. As a result, novel anticoagulants which selectively block key factors in the coagulation cascade are being developed. The efficacy and safety of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate, as well as of the selective factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban, have been demonstrated in Phase III trials for stroke prevention in AF and the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thrombo-embolism. This review summarizes the results from recently published pivotal clinical trials and discusses the opportunities as well as uncertainties in the clinical applications of these novel agent

Featuring: Eugene Braunwald

In the Cardiology Masters section of European Cardiology Review, we bring you an insight into the career of a key contributor to the field of cardiology. In this issue, we feature Professor Eugene Braunwald, cardiovascular medicine specialist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and distinguished Hersey Professor of Medicine at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, US

ST segment resolution as a tool for assessing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy

AbstractRapid, simple and inexpensive measures are needed to assess the efficacy of reperfusion therapy both in clinical practice and in clinical trials testing novel reperfusion regimens. In the last decade, several observations have led to a favorable reappraisal of the utility of ST segment monitoring as a simple means of assessing reperfusion in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction, and ST resolution is being used increasingly in clinical practice and in clinical research. This review focuses on four interrelated roles for ST segment monitoring: the assessment of epicardial reperfusion and the identification of candidates for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention; the evaluation of microvascular and tissue-level reperfusion; the determination of prognosis early after fibrinolytic therapy; and the use of ST segment resolution to compare different reperfusion regimens

Treatment of Heart Failure with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Other Anti-diabetic Drugs

Patients with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of developing heart failure, cardiovascular death and renal failure. The recent results of three large sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor cardiovascular outcomes trials have demonstrated a reduction in heart failure hospitalisation and progressive renal failure. One trial also showed a fall in cardiovascular and total death. A broad spectrum of patients with diabetes benefit from these salutary effects in cardiac and renal function and so these trials have important implications for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Selected glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have also been shown to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes

Reduction of Experimental Myocardial Infarct Size by Corticosteroid Administration

The influence of the administration of pharmacologic doses of hydrocortisone on the extent and severity of acute myocardial ischemic injury and on subsequent necrosis after acute coronary occlusion was investigated in 28 dogs. In order to study acute myocardial injury, repeated epicardial electrocardiograms were recorded from 10 to 15 sites on the anterior surface of the left ventricle. Average ST segment elevation (ST) and the number of sites in which ST segment elevation exceeded 2 mV (NST), indices of the magnitude and extent of myocardial injury, respectively, were analyzed at 30 and 60 min after coronary occlusion. In the control group ST and NST did not change significantly in this time interval while in the treated group, which received 50 mg/kg hydrocortisone just after the 30 min recording, ST fell from 3.5+/-0.8 to 1.1+/-0.4 mV (P 2 mV) in the control group showed histologic changes compatible with early myocardial infarction in 96% of specimens, while this occurred only in 61% and 63% of specimens, respectively, in the treated groups, showing that over one third of the sites were protected from undergoing necrosis due to the intervening hydrocortisone treatment. Thus pharmacological doses of hydrocortisone prevent myocardial cells from progressing to ischemic necrosis even when administration is initiated 6 h after coronary occlusion

Prognostic significance of nonfatal reinfarction during 3-year follow-up: Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II clinical trial

Objectives.This study sought to assess the independent contribution of nonfatal reinfarction to the risk of subsequent death in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing thrombolytic therapy.Background.A composite of “unsatisfactory outcomes” as an end point has increased statistical power and facilitated evaluation of evolving treatment regimens in acute myocardial infarction. The significance of nonfatal reinfarction as a component of a composite end point has not been evaluated in the thrombolytic era.Methods.Event rate of nonfatal reinfarction over 3-year follow-up was evaluated in patients with acute myocardial infarction entered into the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II trial. The independent risk of nonfatal reinfarction for subsequent death within various time intervals of follow-up was determined. The mortality rate after nonfatal reinfarction was compared with that of a matched control group.Results.During 3-year follow-up, 349 of 3,339 patients had a nonfatal reinfarction. Univariate predictors were history (antedating the index event) of angina (p = 0.01), hypertension (p = 0.01), multivessel disease (p = 0.007) and not a current smoker (p = 0.003); the latter was an independent predictor (relative risk [RR] 1.3, 99% confidence interval [CI]1.0 to 1.8). Forty-three of the 349 patients with a nonfatal reinfarction died: RR for death (vs. patients without a nonfatal reinfarction) was 1.9 (99% CI 1.1 to 3.2) if reinfarction occurred within 42 days of study entry, 6.2 (99% CI 3.0 to 12.9) if reinfarction occurred between 43 and 365 days and 2.9 (99% CI 0.6 to 13.4) if reinfarction occurred between 366 days and 3 years. The cumulative 3-year death rate was 14.1% in patients with a nonfatal reinfarction compared with 7.9% (p < 0.01) in a matched control group. Univariate predictors of death after nonfatal reinfarction were age ≥65 years (p < 0.001), not low risk category (p = 0.015) and history of heart failure before the index event (p < 0.001). Age ≥65 years was the only independent predictor (RR 5.4, 99% CI 2.3 to 12.4).Conclusions.Nonfatal reinfarction is a strong and independent predictor for subsequent death. It represents a powerful component for a composite end point in patients who received thrombolytic therapy after acute myocardial infarction

Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction According to Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A TRITON–TIMI 38 Subgroup Analysis (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38)

ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the efficacy of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundTreatment strategies and outcomes for patients with STEMI may differ when treated with primary compared with secondary PCI.MethodsSTEMI patients in the TRITON–TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38) were randomized to prasugrel or clopidogrel on presentation if primary PCI was intended or later during secondary PCI. Primary PCI was defined as within 12 h of symptom onset. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Because periprocedural MI is difficult to assess in the setting of STEMI, we performed analyses excluding these events.ResultsReductions in the primary endpoint with prasugrel versus clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.022) were consistent between primary and secondary PCI patients at 15 months (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.13 vs. HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.93; p interaction = 0.15). However, a tendency toward a difference in treatment effect at 30 days (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.87; p = 0.002) was observed between primary and secondary PCI patients (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.09 vs. HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.76; p interaction = 0.06). When periprocedural MI was excluded, the efficacy of prasugrel remained consistent among primary and secondary PCI patients at 30 days (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.81 vs. HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.88; p interaction = 0.68) and 15 months (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.03 vs. HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.21; p interaction = 0.96).ConclusionsThe efficacy of prasugrel versus clopidogrel was consistent irrespective of the timing of PCI, particularly in preventing nonprocedural events. (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38; NCT00097591