Trastornos hipertensivos del embarazo: Redefiniendo puntos de corte y clasificación

En esta Tesis proponemos valores de la presión arterial (PA) en embarazadas de alto riesgo como posibles puntos de corte, diferentes a los tradicionalmente establecidos, para definir hipertensión arterial (HA). Por otro lado, también proponemos una nueva clasificación de los trastornos hipertensivos del embarazo, que actualmente, según las recomendaciones internacionales, se clasifican simplemente en HA crónica e HA gestacional de acuerdo con la aparición de la HA antes o después de las 20 semanas de gestación. Nuestra hipótesis es, por un lado, que los puntos de corte para definir HA en la embarazada no deben ser 140-90 mmHg, como son los utilizados para definir HA en la población general; ya que los mecanismos fisiológicos que regulan la PA en las mujeres embarazadas son diferentes. Por otro lado, creemos que existen embarazadas que, en la primera mitad del embarazo (< 20 semanas de gestación) tienen HA enmascarada (PA normal en el consultorio y elevada en el monitoreo ambulatorio de la presión arterial -MAPA-). Por lo tanto, si posteriormente durante el transcurso del embarazo se comprueban valores elevados de PA, no son verdaderas HA gestacionales como si lo son, aquellas embarazadas en las que las determinaciones de la PA por ambos métodos (consultorio y MAPA) son normales y solo se detecta el aumento de la PA posterior a las 20 semanas de gestación y que retorna a valores normales luego del parto. Estas últimas tendrían HA gestacional verdadera, mientras que en aquellas embarazadas con HA enmascarada antes de las 20 semanas correspondería diagnosticar Pseudo HA gestacional. Con esta preocupación y con el objetivo de obtener información que respalde la hipótesis de este trabajo de investigación se estudió a mujeres embarazadas derivadas del consultorio de alto riesgo del servicio de Obstetricia del Hospital San Martín de La Plata, a partir de las 10 semanas de gestación hasta la finalización del embarazo. Se realizaron mediciones de la PA en consultorio y ambulatorias antes de las 20 semanas de gestación. Mientras que, durante la segunda mitad del embarazo, además del seguimiento clínico se realizó una evaluación bioquímica exhaustiva. El marco teórico y las justificaciones que nos llevaron a pensar en esta Tesis y desarrollar nuestra hipótesis de trabajo, se desarrollan en el capítulo 1. La forma en que desarrollamos el plan de Tesis para la evaluación, diseño y recolección de los datos se describe en el capítulo 2 para finalmente poder analizarlos tal como se presenta en el capítulo 3. En el capítulo 4 se discuten los hallazgos y comparan con los publicados en la bibliografía. Las conclusiones de la Tesis se presentan en el capítulo 5.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Uso de aspirina 100 mg / dia para prevenção da pré-eclâmpsia, em gestações de alto risco, em uma coorte da Argentina

Objetivos: El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la utilidad de la dosis de 100 mg de aspirina como medida de prevención para preeclampsia en pacientes embarazadas de alto riesgo. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de embarazadas de alto riesgo en seguimiento con un protocolo de tensión arterial y se evaluó la utilización de aspirina 100 mg vs la no utilización de la misma, en la incidencia de PREEC. Se realizó estimaciones de riesgos entre ambos grupos sin y con ajuste de variables con modelos de regresión logística binaria. Resultados: Fueron evaluadas 633 embarazadas de alto riesgo con promedio de 30±7 años y 25±8 semanas de gestación, de las cuales 281 mujeres (44,3%) recibieron aspirina. La prevalencia total de PREEC en nuestra muestra fue de 151 embarazadas (23,8%). Las embarazadas que estaban ingiriendo aspirina, desarrollaron menos eventos de PREEC (19.2% vs 27.5%, p=0.019); con OR no ajustado 0.62 (IC95% 0.43-0.91 p= 0.017). Siendo este riesgo similar cuando fue ajustado por edad, antecedentes de preeclampsia, diabetes mellitus e hipertensión arterial crónica. (OR ajustado 0.63 IC95% 0.43-0.92 p= 0.017). Conclusiones: La utilización de aspirina 100 mg por día antes de las 20 semanas de gestación en embarazadas de alto riesgo disminuyó el riesgo de desarrollar PREEC, independientemente de la edad y factores de riesgo.Objectives: The objective of the present study was to analyse the use of 100 g aspirin dose as prevention method for preeclampsia in high risk pregnant patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in high risk pregnant patients with a blood pressure protocol, and the use of 100 mg of aspirin vs. its non-use was evaluated in the incidence of PREEC. Estimations between the two groups were performed with and without variable adjustment by means of binary logistic regression models. Results: 633 high risk pregnant patients were evaluated. The average age was 30±7 years old, and 25±8 weeks of pregnancy. 281 women (44.3 %) within this group received aspirin. The total prevalence of PREEC in our sample was 151 pregnant women (23.8 %). Pregnant patients under the aspirin treatment developed less PREEC events (19.2% vs 27.5%, p=0.019); with OR not adjusted 0.62 (IC95% 0.43-0.91 p= 0.017). The risk was similar when it was adjusted by age, preeclampsia history, diabetes mellitus and chronic high blood pressure. (OR adjusted 0.63 IC95% 0.43-0.92 p= 0.017). Conclusions: The use of 100 mg of aspirin a day before the 20th week of pregnancy in high risk pregnant patients decreased the risk of developing PREEC, regardless the age and risk factors.Metas: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a utilidade da dose de 100 mg de aspirina como medida preventiva para pré-eclâmpsia em gestantes de alto risco. Métodos: Realizou-se estudo de coorte retrospectivo de gestantes de alto risco em acompanhamento com protocolo de pressão arterial e avaliou-se o uso de aspirina 100 mg versus não uso na incidência de PREEC. As estimativas de risco foram feitas entre os dois grupos sem e com ajuste das variáveis com modelos de regressão logística binária. Resultados: Foram avaliadas 633 gestantes de alto risco com média de 30 ± 7 anos e 25 ± 8 semanas de gestação, sendo que 281 (44,3%) mulheres receberam aspirina. A prevalência total do PREEC em nossa amostra foi de 151 gestantes (23,8%). Mulheres grávidas que estavam tomando aspirina desenvolveram menos eventos PREEC (19,2% vs 27,5%, p = 0,019); com OR não ajustado 0,62 (IC 95% 0,43-0,91 p = 0,017). Esse risco é semelhante quando ajustado para idade, história de pré-eclâmpsia, diabetes mellitus e hipertensão arterial crônica. (OR ajustado 0,63 IC 95% 0,43-0,92 p = 0,017). Conclusões: O uso de Aspirina 100 mg por dia antes da 20ª semana de gestação em gestantes de alto risco diminuiu o risco de desenvolver PREEC, independentemente da idade e dos fatores de risco.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Uso de aspirina 100 mg / dia para prevenção da pré-eclâmpsia, em gestações de alto risco, em uma coorte da Argentina

Objetivos: El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la utilidad de la dosis de 100 mg de aspirina como medida de prevención para preeclampsia en pacientes embarazadas de alto riesgo. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de embarazadas de alto riesgo en seguimiento con un protocolo de tensión arterial y se evaluó la utilización de aspirina 100 mg vs la no utilización de la misma, en la incidencia de PREEC. Se realizó estimaciones de riesgos entre ambos grupos sin y con ajuste de variables con modelos de regresión logística binaria. Resultados: Fueron evaluadas 633 embarazadas de alto riesgo con promedio de 30±7 años y 25±8 semanas de gestación, de las cuales 281 mujeres (44,3%) recibieron aspirina. La prevalencia total de PREEC en nuestra muestra fue de 151 embarazadas (23,8%). Las embarazadas que estaban ingiriendo aspirina, desarrollaron menos eventos de PREEC (19.2% vs 27.5%, p=0.019); con OR no ajustado 0.62 (IC95% 0.43-0.91 p= 0.017). Siendo este riesgo similar cuando fue ajustado por edad, antecedentes de preeclampsia, diabetes mellitus e hipertensión arterial crónica. (OR ajustado 0.63 IC95% 0.43-0.92 p= 0.017). Conclusiones: La utilización de aspirina 100 mg por día antes de las 20 semanas de gestación en embarazadas de alto riesgo disminuyó el riesgo de desarrollar PREEC, independientemente de la edad y factores de riesgo.Objectives: The objective of the present study was to analyse the use of 100 g aspirin dose as prevention method for preeclampsia in high risk pregnant patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in high risk pregnant patients with a blood pressure protocol, and the use of 100 mg of aspirin vs. its non-use was evaluated in the incidence of PREEC. Estimations between the two groups were performed with and without variable adjustment by means of binary logistic regression models. Results: 633 high risk pregnant patients were evaluated. The average age was 30±7 years old, and 25±8 weeks of pregnancy. 281 women (44.3 %) within this group received aspirin. The total prevalence of PREEC in our sample was 151 pregnant women (23.8 %). Pregnant patients under the aspirin treatment developed less PREEC events (19.2% vs 27.5%, p=0.019); with OR not adjusted 0.62 (IC95% 0.43-0.91 p= 0.017). The risk was similar when it was adjusted by age, preeclampsia history, diabetes mellitus and chronic high blood pressure. (OR adjusted 0.63 IC95% 0.43-0.92 p= 0.017). Conclusions: The use of 100 mg of aspirin a day before the 20th week of pregnancy in high risk pregnant patients decreased the risk of developing PREEC, regardless the age and risk factors.Metas: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a utilidade da dose de 100 mg de aspirina como medida preventiva para pré-eclâmpsia em gestantes de alto risco. Métodos: Realizou-se estudo de coorte retrospectivo de gestantes de alto risco em acompanhamento com protocolo de pressão arterial e avaliou-se o uso de aspirina 100 mg versus não uso na incidência de PREEC. As estimativas de risco foram feitas entre os dois grupos sem e com ajuste das variáveis com modelos de regressão logística binária. Resultados: Foram avaliadas 633 gestantes de alto risco com média de 30 ± 7 anos e 25 ± 8 semanas de gestação, sendo que 281 (44,3%) mulheres receberam aspirina. A prevalência total do PREEC em nossa amostra foi de 151 gestantes (23,8%). Mulheres grávidas que estavam tomando aspirina desenvolveram menos eventos PREEC (19,2% vs 27,5%, p = 0,019); com OR não ajustado 0,62 (IC 95% 0,43-0,91 p = 0,017). Esse risco é semelhante quando ajustado para idade, história de pré-eclâmpsia, diabetes mellitus e hipertensão arterial crônica. (OR ajustado 0,63 IC 95% 0,43-0,92 p = 0,017). Conclusões: O uso de Aspirina 100 mg por dia antes da 20ª semana de gestação em gestantes de alto risco diminuiu o risco de desenvolver PREEC, independentemente da idade e dos fatores de risco.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Comparison of two surrogate estimates of insulin resistance to predict cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy individuals

Background and aims: Insulin resistance is associated with a cluster of abnormalities that increase cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several indices have been proposed to identify individuals who are insulin resistant, and thereby at increased CVD risk. The aim of this study was to compare the abilities of 3 indices to accomplish that goal: 1) plasma triglyceride × glucose index (TG × G); 2) plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C); and 3) Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Methods and results: In a population sample of 723 individuals (486 women and 237 men, 50 ± 16 and 51 ± 16 years old, respectively), baseline demographic and metabolic variables known to increase CVD risk and incident CVD were compared among individuals defined as high vs. low risk by: TG × G; TG/HDL-C; or MetS. CVD risk profiles appeared comparable in high risk subjects, irrespective of criteria. Crude incidence of CVD events was increased in high risk subjects: 12.2 vs. 5.3% subjects/10 years, p = 0.005 defined by TG/HDL-C; 13.4 vs. 5.3% subjects/10 years, p = 0.002 defined by TG × G; and 13.4% vs. 4.5% of subjects/10 years, p < 0.001 in subjects with the MetS. The area under the ROC curves to predict CVD were similar, 0.66 vs. 0.67 for TG/HDL-C and TG × G, respectively. However, when adjusted by age, sex and multiple covariates, hazard ratios for incident CVD were significantly increased in high risk patients classified by either TG/HDL-C ratio (2.18, p = 0.021) or MetS (1.93, p = 0.037), but not by TG × G index (1.72, p = 0.087). Conclusion: Although the 3 indices identify CVD risk comparably, the TG × G index seems somewhat less effective at predicting CVD.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Comparison of two surrogate estimates of insulin resistance to predict cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy individuals

Background and aims: Insulin resistance is associated with a cluster of abnormalities that increase cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several indices have been proposed to identify individuals who are insulin resistant, and thereby at increased CVD risk. The aim of this study was to compare the abilities of 3 indices to accomplish that goal: 1) plasma triglyceride × glucose index (TG × G); 2) plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C); and 3) Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Methods and results: In a population sample of 723 individuals (486 women and 237 men, 50 ± 16 and 51 ± 16 years old, respectively), baseline demographic and metabolic variables known to increase CVD risk and incident CVD were compared among individuals defined as high vs. low risk by: TG × G; TG/HDL-C; or MetS. CVD risk profiles appeared comparable in high risk subjects, irrespective of criteria. Crude incidence of CVD events was increased in high risk subjects: 12.2 vs. 5.3% subjects/10 years, p = 0.005 defined by TG/HDL-C; 13.4 vs. 5.3% subjects/10 years, p = 0.002 defined by TG × G; and 13.4% vs. 4.5% of subjects/10 years, p < 0.001 in subjects with the MetS. The area under the ROC curves to predict CVD were similar, 0.66 vs. 0.67 for TG/HDL-C and TG × G, respectively. However, when adjusted by age, sex and multiple covariates, hazard ratios for incident CVD were significantly increased in high risk patients classified by either TG/HDL-C ratio (2.18, p = 0.021) or MetS (1.93, p = 0.037), but not by TG × G index (1.72, p = 0.087). Conclusion: Although the 3 indices identify CVD risk comparably, the TG × G index seems somewhat less effective at predicting CVD.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Riesgo de enfermedades cardiovasculares según categorías de presión arterial en una cohorte argentina

Background: Hypertension is a recognized strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, no data was available in our country to quantify the relationship between blood pressure and cardiovascular event. Objective: to quantify the risk of cardiovascular events according to blood pressure categories. Methods: A prospective epidemiological study was conducted in 1526 inhabitants from Rauch City, (Buenos Aires, Argentina) between 1997 and 2012. Subjects were classified into one of these blood-pressure categories: 1-optimal, 2-normal, 3-high-normal, 4-grade 1 hypertension, 5-grade 2 hypertension and 6-grade 3 hypertension. The first CVD event, including unstable angina pectoris, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, myocardial revascularization, and fatal or non-fatal stroke, was defined as the primary endpoint. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to estimate the relative risk (HR) of CVD according to base-line blood-pressure categories. Results: In 2012, 1124 individuals (73.7% of the baseline sample), 719 women and 405 men (in 1997, aged 45±16 and 46±16 respectively) or their relatives in case of death, could be surveyed again in order to obtain information concerning incident CVD events. Cardiovascular event rates and HR values increased in a stepwise manner across the blood pressure categories (p for trend across categories <0.001 in both sex); however, in subjects aged ≥55 years a j-curve phenomenon was observed, showing the lowest incidence in the high-normal category. In all categories CVD events rates were higher for men. Conclusion: This study quantified relationships between BP and CVD starting from high-normal blood pressure in Argentina.Antecedentes: La hipertensión arterial es un reconocido factor de riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV). Sin embargo, no hay información en Argentina que cuantifique la relación entre la presión arterial (PA) y ECV. Objetivo: Cuantificar el riesgo de ECV de acuerdo a categorías de PA. Método: Se realizó un estudio epidemiológico prospectivo en 1526 habitantes de la ciudad de Rauch (Buenos Aires, Argentina) entre octubre de 1997 y febrero de 2012. Los individuos fueron clasificados en las categorías de PA: 1-óptima, 2-normal, 3-normal-alta, 4-hipertensión grado 1, 5-hipertensión grado 2 y 6-hipertensión grado 3. Fue definido como punto final el primer evento de ECV (angina de pecho inestable, infarto fatal y no fatal, revascularización, y accidente cerebrovascular fatal y no fatal). El riesgo relativo (HR) de tener un evento fue estimado usando modelos de regresión multivariable de Cox. Resultados: En 2012, fueron re-encuestados 1124 individuos (73,7% de la muestra basal), 719 mujeres y 405 hombres, o sus parientes en caso de muerte (edad en 1997 45±16 y 46±16 años, respectivamente). Las tasas de ECV y los HR se incrementaron para cada categoría de PA por encima de la óptima (p &lt; 0.001 en ambos sexos); sin embargo, en sujetos mayores de 55 años se observó un fenómeno de curva en J, con la incidencia más baja en la categoría normal-alto. En todas las categorías la tasa de eventos fue mayor en hombres. Conclusión: Este estudio demostró y cuantificó la relación entre de PA y ECV a partir de PA normal alta en una población de Argentina.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Insulin resistance: the linchpin between prediabetes and cardiovascular disease

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that cardiovascular disease occurs to the greatest extent in persons with prediabetes mellitus who are also insulin resistant. In 2003, 664 non-diabetic women (n = 457) and men (n = 207), aged 52 ± 16 and 53 ± 15 years, were surveyed during a programme for cardiovascular disease prevention. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations defined participants as having normal fasting plasma glucose (fasting plasma glucose <5.6 mmol/L) or prediabetes mellitus (fasting plasma glucose ⩾ 5.6 and <7.0 mmol/L). The tertile of prediabetes mellitus subjects with the highest fasting plasma insulin concentration was classified as insulin resistant. Baseline cardiovascular disease risk factors were accentuated in prediabetes mellitus versus normal fasting glucose, particularly in prediabetes mellitus/insulin resistant. In 2012, 86% of the sample were surveyed again, and the crude incidence for cardiovascular disease was higher in subjects with prediabetes mellitus versus normal fasting glucose (13.7 vs 6.0/100 persons/10 years; age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio = 1.88, p = 0.052). In prediabetes mellitus, the crude incidences were 22.9 versus 9.6/100 persons/10 years in insulin resistant versus non-insulin resistant persons (age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio = 2.36, p = 0.040). In conclusion, cardiovascular disease risk was accentuated in prediabetes mellitus/insulin resistant individuals, with a relative risk approximately twice as high compared to prediabetes mellitus/non-insulin resistant subjects.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Isolated nocturnal hypertension in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus

Introducción: La hipertensión nocturna aislada se asocia a mayor cantidad de eventos cardiovasculares y daño de órgano blanco por hipertensión arterial. La prevalencia en poblaciones especiales no se encuentra del todo descrita. El objetivo del siguiente estudio es describir la prevalencia de hipertensión nocturna aislada en población conviviendo con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana, y observar su relación con las categorías de presión arterial en el consultorio y los fenotipos de la medición ambulatoria de presión arterial de 24 h. Metodología: Se realizó una cohorte retrospectiva en una población con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en un hospital público de España, se registraron características clínico epidemiológicas, mediciones de presión arterial en consultorio y medición ambulatoria de presión arterial de 24 h (MAPA). Se realizó un análisis en función de los diferentes fenotipos de presión arterial por MAPA, así como también en función de las diferentes categorías de presión arterial de consultorio se calcularon los riesgos para la hipertensión nocturna aislada. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el análisis 116 individuos, sin medicación antihipertensiva ni antecedentes de enfermedad cardiovascular establecida. Se describió una prevalencia de hipertensión nocturna del 23,3%. No se pudo demostrar diferencias significativas entre fenotipos por MAPA de ninguna variable propia del VIH. No hubo diferencias de riesgo ajustadas entre las diferentes categorías de normotensos en consultorio. Conclusiones: La hipertensión nocturna aislada es más frecuente en pacientes con VIH, y los valores de presión arterial de consultorio en normotensos no son suficientes para predecir HTA nocturna aislada.Introduction: Isolated nocturnal hypertension is associated with a greater number of cardiovascular events and target organ damage due to arterial hypertension. It has been observed that patients in the general population with this entity do not have high blood pressure figures in the office; and it is necessary to perform an outpatient measurement to unmask it. The prevalence in special populations is not fully described. The objective of the following study is to describe the prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension in a population living with the human immunodeficiency virus and to observe its relationship with the categories of office blood pressure and the phenotypes of the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement. Methodology: A retrospective cohort was carried out in a population with human immunodeficiency virus in a public hospital in Spain, clinical epidemiological characteristics, office blood pressure measurements and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) were recorded. An analysis was performed based on the different ABPM blood pressure phenotypes, as well as based on the different office blood pressure categories, the risks for isolated nocturnal hypertension were calculated. Results: One hundred and sixteen individuals, without antihypertensive medication or history of established cardiovascular disease, were included in the analysis. A prevalence of nocturnal hypertension of 23.3% was described. It was not possible to demonstrate significant differences between phenotypes by ABPM of any variable specific to HIV. There were no adjusted risk differences between the different categories of office normotensives. Conclusions: Isolated nocturnal hypertension is more frequent in patients with HIV and office blood pressure values in normotensive patients are not sufficient to predict isolated nocturnal hypertension.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Nocturnal but not Diurnal Hypertension Is Associated to Insulin Resistance Markers in Subjects with Normal or Mildly Elevated Office Blood Pressure

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the relationships among insulin resistance markers and nocturnal and diurnal hypertension in normotensive or mildly untreated hypertensive adults. Methods: The study was performed in both female and male adults referred to the Cardiometabolic Unit of the Hospital San Martín, La Plata, Argentina, in order to perform an ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) for the evaluation of a possible hypertensive disorder. The population was stratified according to their ABPM in: 1-presence or absence of diurnal hypertension and 2-presence or absence of nocturnal hypertension; both conditions were analyzed separately. Fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and triglycerides (TG)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio were used as surrogate markers of insulin resistance and compared among subjects with vs. without diurnal or nocturnal hypertension. Results: One hundred and five patients, 55 women, 47 (11) years old, and 50 men, 44 (16) years old, were included. Diurnal and nocturnal hypertension were found in 60% and 64% of the sample, respectively. There were no significant differences among the levels of insulin resistance markers between individuals with or without diurnal hypertension. In contrast, individuals with nocturnal hypertension were more insulin resistant irrespectively of whether they were evaluated using FPI (P = 0.016), HOMA-IR (P = 0.019), or TG/HDL-C ratio (P = 0.011); FPI differences remained significant after adjustment for sex, age, and obesity indicators (P = 0.032). Conclusions: Nocturnal but not diurnal hypertension was related to higher levels of 3 insulin resistance markers in normotensive and untreated mildly hypertensive adults; this relationship seems partially independent of obesity.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Nocturnal but not Diurnal Hypertension Is Associated to Insulin Resistance Markers in Subjects with Normal or Mildly Elevated Office Blood Pressure

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the relationships among insulin resistance markers and nocturnal and diurnal hypertension in normotensive or mildly untreated hypertensive adults. Methods: The study was performed in both female and male adults referred to the Cardiometabolic Unit of the Hospital San Martín, La Plata, Argentina, in order to perform an ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) for the evaluation of a possible hypertensive disorder. The population was stratified according to their ABPM in: 1-presence or absence of diurnal hypertension and 2-presence or absence of nocturnal hypertension; both conditions were analyzed separately. Fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and triglycerides (TG)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio were used as surrogate markers of insulin resistance and compared among subjects with vs. without diurnal or nocturnal hypertension. Results: One hundred and five patients, 55 women, 47 (11) years old, and 50 men, 44 (16) years old, were included. Diurnal and nocturnal hypertension were found in 60% and 64% of the sample, respectively. There were no significant differences among the levels of insulin resistance markers between individuals with or without diurnal hypertension. In contrast, individuals with nocturnal hypertension were more insulin resistant irrespectively of whether they were evaluated using FPI (P = 0.016), HOMA-IR (P = 0.019), or TG/HDL-C ratio (P = 0.011); FPI differences remained significant after adjustment for sex, age, and obesity indicators (P = 0.032). Conclusions: Nocturnal but not diurnal hypertension was related to higher levels of 3 insulin resistance markers in normotensive and untreated mildly hypertensive adults; this relationship seems partially independent of obesity.Facultad de Ciencias Médica