A comparison of efficiency between experienced and novice squatters during high intensity squats

Individuals with significant resistance training experience are purported to exhibit greater efficiency at maximal and near maximal intensities during weight training than novice lifters. One of the primary exercises, which has been examined for biomechanical and technique efficiency is the squat. However, the comparison of lifting velocities between experienced and novice squatters as a marker of neuromuscular efficiency, has yet to be investigated.Florida Atlantic University proyecto internacional3.983 JCR (2014) Q1, 6/81 Sport SciencesUE

Does high intensity squatting elicit post activation potentiation in the squat?

The phenomenon post activation potentiation (PAP) can be defined as an increase in muscle performance following a heavy contraction of a movement that utilizes the same muscle group (i.e. improved 20m sprint following a high intensity squat). However, research has yet to examine if heavy squats elicit PAP on the squat itself. Further, past studies have not yet analyzed if PAP is elicited at a moderate intensity (i.e. 60% one-repetition maximum-1RM).Florida Atlantic University3.983 JCR (2014) Q1, 6/81 Sport Sciences.UE

Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve

The primary aim of this study was to compare rating of perceived exertion (RPE) values measuring repetitions in reserve (RIR) at particular intensities of 1 repetition maximum (RM) in experienced (ES) and novice squatters (NS). Furthermore, this investigation compared average velocity between ES and NS at the same intensities. Twenty-nine individuals (24.0 ± 3.4 years) performed a 1RM squat followed by a single repetition with loads corresponding to 60, 75, and 90% of 1RM and an 8-repetition set at 70% 1RM. Average velocity was recorded at 60, 75, and 90% 1RM and on the first and last repetitions of the 8-repetition set. Subjects reported an RPE value that corresponded to an RIR value (RPE-10 = 0-RIR, RPE-9 = 1-RIR, and so forth). Subjects were assigned to one of the 2 groups: (a) ES (n = 15, training age: 5.2 ± 3.5 years) and (b) NS (n = 14, training age: 0.4 ± 0.6 years). The mean of the average velocities for ES was slower (p ≤ 0.05) than NS at 100% and 90% 1RM. However, there were no differences (p > 0.05) between groups at 60, 75%, or for the first and eighth repetitions at 70% 1RM. In addition, ES recorded greater RPE at 1RM than NS (p = 0.023). In ES, there was a strong inverse relationship between average velocity and RPE at all percentages (r = −0.88, p < 0.001), and a strong inverse correlation in NS between average velocity and RPE at all intensities (r = −0.77, p = 0.001). Our findings demonstrate an inverse relationship between average velocity and RPE/RIR. Experienced squatter group exhibited slower average velocity and higher RPE at 1RM than NS, signaling greater efficiency at high intensities. The RIR-based RPE scale is a practical method to regulate daily training load and provide feedback during a 1RM test.Florida Atlantic University2.060 JCR (2016) Q2, 28/81 Sport Sciences1.354 SJR (2016) Q1, 348/2886 Medicine (miscellaneous), 30/280 Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 15/195 Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 28/127 Sports ScienceNo data IDR 2016UE