Reproducibility and its confounders of CMR feature tracking myocardial strain analysis in patients with suspected myocarditis.

OBJECTIVES Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is an emerging technique for assessing myocardial strain with valuable diagnostic and prognostic potential. However, the reproducibility of biventricular CMR-FT analysis in a large cardiovascular population has not been assessed. Also, evidence of confounders impacting reader reproducibility for CMR-FT in patients is unknown and currently limits the clinical implementation of this technique. METHODS From a dual-center database of patients referred to CMR for suspected myocarditis, 125 patients were randomly selected to undergo biventricular CMR-FT analysis for 2-dimensional systolic and diastolic measures, with additional 3-dimensional analysis for the left ventricle. All image analysis was replicated by a single reader and by a second reader for intra- and inter-reader analysis (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Reliability was tested with intraclass correlation (ICC) tests, and the impact of imaging confounders on agreement was assessed through multivariable analysis. RESULTS Left and right ventricular ejection fractions were reduced in 34% and 37% of the patients, respectively. Good to excellent reliability was shown for 2D (all ICC > 0.85) and 3D (all ICC > 0.70) peak strain and early diastolic strain rate for both ventricles in longitudinal orientation as well as circumferential orientations for the left ventricle. An increased slice number improved agreement while the presence of pericardial effusion compromised diastolic strain rate agreement, and arrhythmia compromised right ventricular agreement. CONCLUSION In a large clinical cohort, we could show CMR-FT yields excellent inter-reader and intra-reader reproducibility. Multi-parametric CMR-FT of the right and left ventricles appears to be a robust tool in cardiovascular patients referred to CMR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03470571, NCT04774549. Key Points • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is an emerging technique to measure myocardial strain in cardiovascular patients referred for CMR; however, the evaluation of its reproducibility in a large cohort has not yet been performed. • In a large clinical cohort, CMR-FT yields excellent inter-reader and intra-reader reproducibility for both left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters. • Arrhythmia and pericardial effusion compromise agreement of select FT parameters, but poor ejection fraction does not

Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance segmental myocardial strain for detecting microvascular obstruction and late gadolinium enhancement in patients presenting after a ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Background Microvascular obstruction (MVO) and Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) assessed in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are associated with adverse outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our aim was to analyze the diagnostic performance of segmental strain for the detection of MVO and LGE. Methods Patients with anterior STEMI, who underwent additional CMR were enrolled in this sub-study of the CARE-AMI trial. Using CMR feature tracking (FT) segmental circumferential peak strain (SCS) was measured and the diagnostic performance of SCS to discriminate MVO and LGE was assessed in a derivation and validation cohort. Results Forty-eight STEMI patients (62 ± 12 years old), 39 (81%) males, who underwent CMR (i.e., mean 3.0 ± 1.5 days) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. All patients presented with LGE and in 40 (83%) patients, MVO was additionally present. Segments in all patients were visually classified and 146 (19%) segments showed MVO (i.e., LGE+/MVO+), 308 (40%) segments showed LGE and no MVO (i.e., LGE+/MVO-), and 314 (41%) segments showed no LGE (i.e., LGE-). Diagnostic performance of SCS for detecting MVO segments (i.e., LGE+/MVO+ vs. LGE+/MVO-, and LGE-) showed an AUC = 0.764 and SCS cut-off value was -11.2%, resulting in a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 67% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 30% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% when tested in the validation group. For LGE segments (i.e., LGE+/MVO+ and LGE+/MVO- vs. LGE-) AUC = 0.848 and SCS with a cut-off value of -13.8% yielded to a sensitivity of 76%, specificity of 74%, PPV of 81%, and NPV of 70%. Conclusion Segmental strain in STEMI patients was associated with good diagnostic performance for detection of MVO+ segments and very good diagnostic performance of LGE+ segments. Segmental strain may be useful as a potential contrast-free surrogate marker to improve early risk stratification in patients after primary PCI

Multimodality Imaging for Evaluation of Bicaval Valved Stent Implantation in Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Preprocedural planning and postprocedural evaluation after transcatheter treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation remain challenging and require further research and standardization. We illustrate the use of multimodality imaging techniques in 3 patients undergoing implantation of a novel custom-made bicaval valved stent for symptomatic treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Effect of Paroxetine-Mediated G-Protein Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibition vs Placebo in Patients With Anterior Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance Left ventricular remodeling following acute myocardial infarction results in progressive myocardial dysfunction and adversely affects prognosis. Objective To investigate the efficacy of paroxetine-mediated G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 inhibition to mitigate adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Design, Setting, and Participants This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. Patients with acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 45% or less were randomly allocated to 2 study arms between October 26, 2017, and September 21, 2020. Interventions Patients in the experimental arm received 20 mg of paroxetine daily; patients in the control group received a placebo daily. Both treatments were provided for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the difference in patient-level improvement of LVEF between baseline and 12 weeks as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance tomography. Secondary end points were changes in left ventricular dimensions and late gadolinium enhancement between baseline and follow-up. Results Fifty patients (mean [SD] age, 62 [13] years; 41 men [82%]) with acute anterior myocardial infarction were randomly allocated to paroxetine or placebo, of whom 38 patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging both at baseline and 12 weeks. There was no difference in recovery of LVEF between the experimental group (mean [SD] change, 4.0% [7.0%]) and the control group (mean [SD] change, 6.3% [6.3%]; mean difference, -2.4% [95% CI, -6.8% to 2.1%]; P = .29) or changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (mean difference, 13.4 [95% CI, -12.3 to 39.0] mL; P = .30) and end-systolic volume (mean difference, 11.4 [95% CI, -3.6 to 26.4] mL; P = .13). Late gadolinium enhancement as a percentage of the total left ventricular mass decreased to a larger extent in the experimental group (mean [SD], -13.6% [12.9%]) compared with the control group (mean [SD], -4.5% [9.5%]; mean difference, -9.1% [95% CI, -16.6% to -1.6%]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this trial, treatment with paroxetine did not improve LVEF after myocardial infarction compared with placebo. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03274752

The role and utilisation of public health evaluations in Europe: a case study of national hand hygiene campaigns

To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked Files. This article is open access.Evaluations are essential to judge the success of public health programmes. In Europe, the proportion of public health programmes that undergo evaluation remains unclear. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control sought to determine the frequency of evaluations amongst European national public health programmes by using national hand hygiene campaigns as an example of intervention.A cohort of all national hand hygiene campaigns initiated between 2000 and 2012 was utilised for the analysis. The aim was to collect information about evaluations of hand hygiene campaigns and their frequency. The survey was sent to nominated contact points for healthcare-associated infection surveillance in European Union and European Economic Area Member States.Thirty-six hand hygiene campaigns in 20 countries were performed between 2000 and 2012. Of these, 50% had undergone an evaluation and 55% of those utilised the WHO hand hygiene intervention self-assessment tool. Evaluations utilised a variety of methodologies and indicators in assessing changes in hand hygiene behaviours pre and post intervention. Of the 50% of campaigns that were not evaluated, two thirds reported that both human and financial resource constraints posed significant barriers for the evaluation.The study identified an upward trend in the number of hand hygiene campaigns implemented in Europe. It is likely that the availability of the internationally-accepted evaluation methodology developed by the WHO contributed to the evaluation of more hand hygiene campaigns in Europe. Despite this rise, hand hygiene campaigns appear to be under-evaluated. The development of simple, programme-specific, standardised guidelines, evaluation indicators and other evidence-based public health materials could help promote evaluations across all areas of public health