Sex and gender aspects on intensive care : access, intensity and outcome

There is an underlying assumption in society that critically ill patients are admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) based on their illness severity coupled with their comorbidities, and that other variables are irrelevant. It is therefore troublesome to not fully understand the sexdiscrepancy in the ICU-population; the gender distribution in intensive care units is consistently found to be around 60% men and 40% women. We sought to elucidate the reasons for this discrepancy by constructing five different studies, covering the entire chain from admittance to the ICU until 90 days post intensive care. The overall aim for this thesis is to investigate if there are differences in allocation of intensive care resources depending on whether the patient is a man or a woman. The first two studies aimed at investigating gender differences in the afferent arm, i.e., the access to the ICU. This was done using surveys with fictive patient cases, where the respondent was to decide whether the patient in each case described was in need of ICU care or not. We concluded that in a blinded survey we could not see any differences in admittance to the ICU depending on whether the patient was a man or a woman. Study III is a retrospective cohort study with 8,598 adult patients admitted between 2006 and 2016 to the ICU at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. This study explored differences in the efferent arm, i.e., sex- and gender-based differences in discharge from the ICU and mortality after intensive care. We found that women had a higher probability of being discharged from the ICU. There were no differences in 30- or 90-day mortality. In Study IV we used the same cohort as in study III. In this retrospective cohort study, we explored care provided within the ICU, specifically different ICU-typical items, for example mechanical ventilation, vasoactive and inotropic treatment. We concluded that differences in the level of intensive care provided to men and women exist. Given equal severity of illness, men receive more intensive care. Finally, in study V, we investigated differences between men and women regarding care provided in the ICU as well as long-term outcome for all ICU-treated patients with COVID- 19 during the spring of 2020 in Sweden. Male sex was significantly associated with mortality. Additionally, age, COPD/asthma, immune deficiency, malignancy, SAPS 3 and admission month were associated with mortality. In this nationwide study of ICU patients with COVID- 19 we concluded that men were at higher risk of poor long-term outcome compared to women

Acid Tar Lagoons : Assessment and Environmental Interaction

EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Long-term survival after intensive care for COVID-19: a nationwide cohort study of more than 8000 patients

Background Was it worth it-what is the outcome after the extended ICU (intensive care unit) length of stay for COVID-19 patients? Surprisingly, data on long-term mortality in large cohorts are lacking. We investigate long-term mortality including differences between men and women, as previous studies show that men generally suffer a more severe course of COVID-19 in terms of severity of illness and short-term mortality.Methods Nationwide cohort including all adult COVID-19 patients admitted to Swedish ICUs until August 12, 2022. Primary outcome was 360-day mortality after ICU admission. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics and mortality.Results In total, 8392 patients were included. Median (IQR) age was 63 (52-72) years and the majority (70.1%) were men. Among the 7390 patients with complete 360-day mortality data, 1775 (24.4%) patients died within 30 days, 2125 (28.8%) within 90 days and 2206 (29.8%) within 360 days from ICU admission. 360-day mortality was 27.1% in women and 31.0% in men. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed increased risk of 360-day mortality in men compared to women (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.17-1.52). Other variables associated with poor 360-day mortality were age, cardiac disease, COPD/asthma, diabetes, immune deficiency, chronic kidney disease, neuromuscular disease, and malignancy.Conclusion This study confirms the increased severity of disease in critically ill men with COVID-19, even in a long-term perspective. However, mortality beyond 90 days was strikingly low, indicating high probability of survival after the acute phase of illness.Funding Agencies|We gratefully acknowledge the participating ICUs for their hard work in contributing data to the Swedish Intensive Care Registry.</p

Additional file 1: of The influence of gender on ICU admittance

Supplementary data. Has the full survey, case changes (Table S1) and participatinghospitals (Table S2). (DOCX 27 kb

Copyright: Elsevier

Implications for burn shock resuscitation of a new in vivo human vascular microdosing technique (microdialysis) for dermal administration of noradrenalin