8 research outputs found

    Expression level of serum miR-146a in Ecuadorian Non-diabetic controls and T2D patients.

    No full text
    <p>Fig. 1 shows mean and standard deviation of the fold change values of miR-146a (reference microRNA sync-cel-mir-39) in the serum of the T2D patients as compared to Non-diabetic controls. Differences between groups were tested using independent T test. Levels of significance were set at p = 0.05 (two-tailed).</p

    Decreased Serum Level of miR-146a as Sign of Chronic Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Background</p><p>There is increasing evidence that chronic inflammation is an important determinant in insulin resistance and in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D). MicroRNAs constitute a newly discovered system of cell regulation and in particular two microRNAs (miR-146a and miR-155) have been described as regulators and biomarkers of inflammation.</p><p>Aim</p><p>To determine a putative association between the levels of miR-146a and miR-155 in serum of T2D patients, clinical parameters and serological indicators of inflammation.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We performed quantitative Real Time PCR (qPCR) of microRNAs from serum (56 Ecuadorian T2D ambulatory patients and 40 non-diabetic controls). In addition, we evaluated T2D-related serum cytokines.chemokines and growth factors using a commercially available multi-analyte cytometric bead array system. We correlated outcomes to clinical parameters, including BMI, HbA1c and lipid state.</p><p>Results</p><p>The Ecuadorian non-diabetic controls appeared as overweight (BMI>25: patients 85%, controls 82.5%) and as dyslipidemic (hypercholesterolemia: patients 60.7%, controls 67.5%) as the patients.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The serum levels of miR-146a were significantly reduced in T2D patients as compared to these non-diabetic, but obese/dyslipidemic control group (mean patients 0.61, mean controls set at 1; p = 0.042), those of miR-155 were normal.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The serum levels of both microRNAs correlated to each other (r = 0.478; p<0.001) and to leptin levels. The microRNAs did not correlate to BMI, glycemia and dyslipidemia.</p><p></p><p></p><p>From the tested cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, we found IL-8 and HGF significantly raised in T2D patients versus non-diabetic controls (p = 0.011 and 0.023 respectively).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This study shows decreased serum anti-inflammatory miR-146a, increased pro-inflammatory IL-8 and increased HGF (a vascular/insular repair factor) as discriminating markers of failure of glucose control occurring on the background of obesity and dyslipidemia.</p></div

    A Mendelian Randomization Study of Metabolite Profiles, Fasting Glucose, and Type 2 Diabetes.

    Full text link
    Mendelian randomization (MR) provides us the opportunity to investigate the causal paths of metabolites in type 2 diabetes and glucose homeostasis. We developed and tested an MR approach based on genetic risk scoring for plasma metabolite levels, utilizing a pathway-based sensitivity analysis to control for nonspecific effects. We focused on 124 circulating metabolites that correlate with fasting glucose in the Erasmus Rucphen Family (ERF) study (n = 2,564) and tested the possible causal effect of each metabolite with glucose and type 2 diabetes and vice versa. We detected 14 paths with potential causal effects by MR, following pathway-based sensitivity analysis. Our results suggest that elevated plasma triglycerides might be partially responsible for increased glucose levels and type 2 diabetes risk, which is consistent with previous reports. Additionally, elevated HDL components, i.e., small HDL triglycerides, might have a causal role of elevating glucose levels. In contrast, large (L) and extra large (XL) HDL lipid components, i.e., XL-HDL cholesterol, XL-HDL-free cholesterol, XL-HDL phospholipids, L-HDL cholesterol, and L-HDL-free cholesterol, as well as HDL cholesterol seem to be protective against increasing fasting glucose but not against type 2 diabetes. Finally, we demonstrate that genetic predisposition to type 2 diabetes associates with increased levels of alanine and decreased levels of phosphatidylcholine alkyl-acyl C42:5 and phosphatidylcholine alkyl-acyl C44:4. Our MR results provide novel insight into promising causal paths to and from glucose and type 2 diabetes and underline the value of additional information from high-resolution metabolomics over classic biochemistry

    Hierarchical cluster analysis of the tested genes and microRNAs of the monocytes of Ecuadorian type 2 diabetic patients and controls in the validation cohort.

    No full text
    <p>On the left, the fold change values between the T2D group and the non-diabetic controls were determined from normalized Ct values (Ct gene/Ct reference gene ABL) by the ΔΔCt method (2−ΔΔCt, User Bulletin 2; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Data were standardized to the non-diabetic control subjects. The fold change of each gene in the non-diabetic control subjects is therefore 1. Differences between groups were tested using t tests for independent samples. This table shows that 2 microRNAs (MiR-34c-5p and miR-576-3p) were significantly higher expressed in the monocytes of the T2D patients compared to non-diabetic controls. Also, 4 genes (of the 24 tested) were significantly different expressed (PTGS2 lower, and CD9, DHRS3 and PTPN7 significantly higher). The heatmap and dendrogram present the result of the hierarchical clustering of the genes. Three major clusters were found: Cluster A contains inflammatory compounds and includes miR-410 and miR-576-3p. Cluster B contains inflammatory compounds and factors involved with migration/differentiation/metabolism; Cluster C only consists of migration/metabolic factors. MiR-138, miR-574-3p, miR-146a and miR-34c-5p formed a sub-cluster within cluster C and strongly clustered together.</p

    Dendrogram and heatmap of hierarchical clustering of T2D patients and non-diabetic controls of the validation cohort using microRNA and mRNA expression as determined by qPCR.

    No full text
    <p>This figure shows that two main subject clusters (X and Y) could be identified. Cluster X contained 5 diabetics and 7 non-diabetic subjects, and cluster Y comprised 17 diabetics and 12 non-diabetics. This approach did not distinguish between T2D patients and non-diabetic controls.</p

    Patients and Non-diabetic controls characteristics.

    No full text
    <p>Values in bold denote a significant difference between two groups.</p><p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115209#pone-0115209-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> shows the number of patients and controls used in this study and their ages, gender, comorbidities, HbA1c/hyperglycemia, BMI, lipid profile and medication use.</p><p>Patients and Non-diabetic controls characteristics.</p
    corecore