34 research outputs found

    Role of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in neuroendocrine responses to daylength in the golden hamster

    Full text link
    Daylength regulates reproduction in golden hamsters through a mechanism which involves the pineal indoleamine, melatonin. Retinal input to the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN) and sympathetic innervation of the pineal are critical to the inhibition of reproduction by short photoperiods. Since the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) receives extensive input from the SCN in the rat, and may influence autonomic function via its brainstem and spinal cord projections, we studied the role of this nucleus in photoperiodically induced gonadal regression in the hamster. Bilateral electrolytic destruction of either the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) or suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus completely blocked testicular regression induced by either blinding or exposure to short days (10L:14D). Lesions in the retrochiasmatic hypothalamus (RCA) which may have interrupted the pathway of previously identified efferents from the SCN to the PVN were also effective in preventing short day-induced gonadal regression. Pineal melatonin content was measured in intact and lesioned hamsters sacrificed 3-5 h before lights on, at the time of the expected nocturnal peak. While SCN and RCA lesions significantly reduced pineal melatonin content, PVN lesions were still more effective in this regard. We conclude that the hamster's neuroendocrine response to photoperiod is mediated by neural pathways which include retinohypothalamic input to the SCN and efferents from this nucleus to the PVN which travel dorsocaudally through the retrochiasmatic area of the hypothalamus. Effectiveness of lesions restricted to the PVN suggests that direct projections from the PVN to spinal autonomic centers convey photoperiodic information which regulates pineal, and hence gonadal, function.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/24726/1/0000148.pd

    Total pinealectomy by an occipital parasagittal approach in sheep

    Full text link
    A reliable method of total pinealectomy in sheep without a resulting significant neurological deficit has been developed and is described. The known effect of light on sheep gonadotropin levels helps validate these studies of its pineal gland. Special attention is given to delineation of the surgical anatomy of the gland and its relationship under magnification to the central draining veins of the brain. In this large mammal this relationship differs considerably from that of humans. The application of an intrahemispheric occipital exposure using magnification, as well as the preoperative administration of steroids and osmotic agents, helped to minimize the effects of retraction and resultant cerebral edema. We have thus been able to increase the rate of successful pinealectomy to 83%, allowing the development of groups of animals suitable for studies of the neuroendocrine function of the pineal and pituitary glands.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23818/1/0000057.pd

    Effect of genotype on circadian period and its variability in male hamsters.

    No full text
    <p>Mean (±SEM) τ<sub>DD</sub> (top) and phase variation (bottom) of the time of activity onset (black bars), offset (hatched bars) or acrophase (white bars) of the first-order regression line used to determine τ<sub>DD</sub> in male hamsters bearing wild type, <i>tau</i>, and duper alleles in various combinations. Posthoc analysis indicated statistically significant differences in τ<sub>DD</sub> of activity onsets at the <i>P</i><0.05 level: TTDd = TTDD>TTdd>TtDD>ttDD>Ttdd>ttdd (Tukey HSD test; TtDd did not differ from TTdd and TtDD). Statistical differences between genotypes in τ<sub>DD</sub> of activity offset and acrophase showed similar patterns. Note that while strains differ markedly in τ<sub>DD</sub>, phase variation is generally similar between genotypes. For phase rariation of activity onset and offset, only ttdd and TTdd groups differed from each other at the <i>P</i><0.05 level; for phase variation of acrophase, ttdd>TTDD = TTdd. In all genotypes, phase variation of τ<sub>DD</sub> based on activity offset is greater than phase variation of τ<sub>DD</sub> assessed for onsets or acrophase.</p

    Circadian period does not predict activity:rest ratio.

    No full text
    <p>The relationship between the activity/rest ratio and the period of activity onsets (τ<sub>onset</sub>) in constant darkness was similar in TTDD, TTdd, ttDD and ttdd hamsters.</p

    Relationships between activity or rest duration and circadian period differ between genotypes.

    No full text
    <p>Correlations between the period of activity onset (τ<sub>DD</sub>) and α (top) or ρ (bottom) in TTDD (diamonds), TTdd (squares), ?tDD (triangles), and ttdd (circles) Syrian hamsters. Both α and ρ correlated with τ<sub>DD</sub> across all genotypes (linear and quadratic fits both <i>P</i><0.0001) but in none of the individual strains was the fit of the linear or quadratic regression statistically significant.</p

    All strains show coherent rhythmicity despite differences in precision.

    No full text
    <p>Actograms depicting locomotor activity rhythms in DD in the individuals showing the median value of circadian precision among groups of (A) TTDD, (B)TTdd, (C) ttDD, and (D) ttdd male hamsters. In each panel the top actogram is plotted modulo 24h. The same data are replotted in the bottom actogram modulo τ<sub>DD</sub>.</p

    Compensatory changes in variability of α and ρ occur to minimize variability of τ<sub>DD</sub>.

    No full text
    <p>Summed variance of activity and rest is greater than the variance of free running period of activity onsets in male TTDD (diamonds), TTdd (squares), ttDD (triangles) and ttdd (circles) hamsters.</p

    Mean (± SEM) period of activity onsets and precision, and linear and quadratic regression analysis in male wild type and mutant Syrian hamsters.

    No full text
    <p>Groups with different superscripts differ significantly at <i>P</i><0.05 level. Linear and quadratic R<sup>2</sup> values reflect first and second order regression fits of τ<sub>DD</sub> vs. precision within the respective group, respectively. Even in cases in which regression fit was statistically significant, the maximum precision did not occur at the mean τ<sub>DD</sub>. When all male hamsters were combined and analyzed across genotypes, linear and quadratic fits were both statistically significant at the <i>P</i><0.0001 level, but the R<sup>2</sup> value was low (0.09 and 0.118, respectively).</p
    corecore