Linguistic and social justice: towards a debate of intersections and disjuncture

Language and social justice in practice Netta Avineri Laura R. Graham Eric J. Johnson Robin Conley Riner Jonathan Rosa (Eds.) New York, NY: Routledge. 2019. 248 pp. Hb (9781138069442) £115.00 / Pb (9781138069459) £30.99 / Ebook: (9781315115702) £15.50. Language policy and linguistic justice: Economic, philosophical and sociolinguistic approaches Michele Gazzola Torsten Templin Bengt‐Arne Wickström (Eds.) Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. 2018. 535 pp. Hb (978‐3‐319‐75261‐7 160), €49 / Pb (978‐3‐030‐09184‐2) n/a / Ebook (978‐3‐319‐75263‐1 118) €9

Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices

Loss aversion can occur in riskless and risky choices. Yet, there is no evidence whether people who are loss averse in riskless choices are also loss averse in risky choices. We measure individual-level loss aversion in riskless choices in an endowment effect experiment by eliciting both WTA and WTP from each of our 360 subjects (randomly selected customers of a car manufacturer). All subjects also participate in a simple lottery choice task which arguably measures loss aversion in risky choices. We find substantial heterogeneity in both measures of loss aversion. Loss aversion in the riskless choice task and loss aversion in the risky choice task are highly significantly and strongly positively correlated. We find that in both choice tasks loss aversion increases in age, income, and wealth, and decreases in education.Loss aversion, endowment effect, field experiments

Cognition and framing in sequential bargaining for gains and losses

Noncooperative game-theoretic models of sequential bargaining give an underpinning to cooperative solution concepts derived from axioms, and have proved useful in applications (see Osborne and Rubinstein 1990). But experimental studies of sequential bargaining with discounting have generally found systematic deviations between the offers people make and perfect equilibrium offers derived from backward induction (e.g., Ochs and Roth 1989). We have extended this experimental literature in two ways. First, we used a novel software system to record the information subjects looked at while they bargained. Measuring patterns of information search helped us draw inferences about how people think, testing as directly as possible whether people use backward induction to compute offers. Second, we compared bargaining over gains that shrink over time (because of discounting) to equivalent bargaining over losses that expand over time. In the games we studied, two players bargain by making a finite number of alternating offers. A unique subgame-perfect equilibrium can be computed by backward induction. The induction begins in the last period and works forward. Our experiments use a three-round game with a pie of $5.00 and a 50-percent discount factor (so the pie shrinks to$2.50 and $1.25 in the second and third rounds). In the perfect equilibrium the first player offers the second player$1.25 and keeps $3.75

Flexibility, Dissonance and the conscious consumer

This paper considers the ethical purchasing of what are described as conscious consumers. Conscious consumers present a complex mix of behaviors; while seeking ethical alternatives, other social and economic forces impact on their behavior such that positive ethical choices are not always made. We identify two areas of theory relevant to the conceptualization of such consumers, flexibility and dissonance theory. A study of nine participants identified as conscious consumers was undertaken. As anticipated the participants revealed a range of often contradictory behaviors regarding their ethical purchases. The relevance of flexibility and dissonance theory to their behavior is discussed

Historical Notes on German Press Coverage of Technology

Professor Kepplinger accounts for increased negativism in German media coverage of technology by pointing to changes in journalists\u27 role definitions and attitudes

Foreword

The collection of articles in this Special Issue is based on an international conference on Advances in the Behavioral Analysis of Law: Markets, Institutions, and Contracts that took place on December 8, 2009 at the University of Haifa Faculty of Law in Israel. The conference addressed cuttingedge legal issues at the intersection of law, economics, and psychology from a diverse set of viewpoints, bringing together scholars engaged in both theoretical and experimental behavioral analyses of law

Media Coverage of EPA\u27s Draft Dioxin Reassessment Report

Using content analysis, the authors examine the utility of news media in democratic decision making