25 research outputs found

    Joint analysis of PK and immunogenicity outcomes using factorization model − a powerful approach for PK similarity study

    Get PDF
    Biological products, whether they are innovator products or biosimilars, can incite an immunogenic response ensuing in the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The presence of ADA’s often affects the drug clearance, resulting in an increase in the variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and challenges in the design and analysis of PK similarity studies. Immunogenic response is a complex process which may be manifested by product and non-product-related factors. Potential imbalances in non-product-related factors between treatment groups may lead to differences in antibodies formation and thus in PK outcome. The current standard statistical approaches dismiss any associations between immunogenicity and PK outcomes. However, we consider PK and immunogenicity as the two correlated outcomes of the study treatment. In this research, we propose a factorization model for the simultaneous analysis of PK parameters (normal variable after taking log-transformation) and immunogenic response subgroup (binary variable). The central principle of the factorization model is to describe the likelihood function as the product of the marginal distribution of one outcome and the conditional distribution of the second outcome given the previous one. Factorization model captures the additional information contained in the correlation between the outcomes, it is more efficient than models that ignore potential dependencies between the outcomes. In our context, factorization model accounts for variability in PK data by considering the influence of immunogenicity. Based on our simulation studies, the factorization model provides more accurate and efficient estimates of the treatment effect in the PK data by taking into account the impact of immunogenicity. These findings are supported by two PK similarity clinical studies with a highly immunogenic biologic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01742-2

    Essential protective role of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 in neurodegeneration

    Get PDF
    Despite the recognized role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in inflammation and neuronal degeneration, anti-TNF therapeutics failed to treat neurodegenerative diseases. Animal disease models had revealed the antithetic effects of the two TNF receptors (TNFR) in the central nervous system, whereby TNFR1 has been associated with inflammatory degeneration and TNFR2 with neuroprotection. We here show the therapeutic potential of selective inhibition of TNFR1 and activation of TNFR2 by ATROSAB, a TNFR1-selective antagonistic antibody, and EHD2-scTNFR2, an agonistic TNFR2-selective TNF, respectively, in a mouse model of NMDA-induced acute neurodegeneration. Coadministration of either ATROSAB or EHD2-scTNFR2 into the magnocellular nucleus basalis significantly protected cholinergic neurons and their cortical projections against cell death, and reverted the neurodegeneration-associated memory impairment in a passive avoidance paradigm. Simultaneous blocking of TNFR1 and TNFR2 signaling, however, abrogated the therapeutic effect. Our results uncover an essential role of TNFR2 in neuroprotection. Accordingly, the therapeutic activity of ATROSAB is mediated by shifting the balance of the antithetic activity of endogenous TNF toward TNFR2, which appears essential for neuroprotection. Our data also explain earlier results showing that complete blocking of TNF activity by anti-TNF drugs was detrimental rather than protective and argue for the use of next-generation TNFR-selective TNF therapeutics as an effective approach in treating neurodegenerative diseases.</p

    Determinants of GBP Recruitment to Toxoplasma gondii Vacuoles and the Parasitic Factors That Control It

    Get PDF
    IFN-γ is a major cytokine that mediates resistance against the intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii. The p65 guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) are strongly induced by IFN-γ. We studied the behavior of murine GBP1 (mGBP1) upon infection with T. gondii in vitro and confirmed that IFN-γ-dependent re-localization of mGBP1 to the parasitophorous vacuole (PV) correlates with the virulence type of the parasite. We identified three parasitic factors, ROP16, ROP18, and GRA15 that determine strain-specific accumulation of mGBP1 on the PV. These highly polymorphic proteins are held responsible for a large part of the strain-specific differences in virulence. Therefore, our data suggest that virulence of T. gondii in animals may rely in part on recognition by GBPs. However, phagosomes or vacuoles containing Trypanosoma cruzi did not recruit mGBP1. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed mGBP2, mGBP4, and mGBP5 as binding partners of mGBP1. Indeed, mGBP2 and mGBP5 co-localize with mGBP1 in T. gondii-infected cells. T. gondii thus elicits a cell-autonomous immune response in mice with GBPs involved. Three parasitic virulence factors and unknown IFN-γ-dependent host factors regulate this complex process. Depending on the virulence of the strains involved, numerous GBPs are brought to the PV as part of a large, multimeric structure to combat T. gondii.National Institutes of Health (U.S.)Massachusetts Life Sciences Center (New Investigator Award)National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U.S.) (Pre-Doctoral Grant in the Biological Sciences (5-T32-GM007287-33))Studienstiftung des deutschen VolkesCancer Research Institute (New York, N.Y.)Cleo and Paul Schimmel FoundationBayer HealthcareHuman Frontier Science Program (Strasbourg, France

    The guanylate binding protein-1 GTPase controls the invasive and angiogenic capability of endothelial cells through inhibition of MMP-1 expression

    No full text
    Expression of the large GTPase guanylate binding protein-1 (GBP-1) is induced by inflammatory cytokines (ICs) in endothelial cells (ECs), and the helical domain of the molecule mediates the repression of EC proliferation by ICs. Here we show that the expression of GBP-1 and of the matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) are inversely related in vitro and in vivo, and that GBP-1 selectively inhibits the expression of MMP-1 in ECs, but not the expression of other proteases. The GTPase activity of GBP-1 was necessary for this effect, which inhibited invasiveness and tube-forming capability of ECs in three-dimensional collagen-I matrices. A GTPase-deficient mutant (D184N-GBP-1) operated as a transdominant inhibitor of wild-type GBP-1 and rescued MMP-1 expression in the presence of ICs. Expression of D184N-GBP-1, as well as paracrine supplementation of MMP-1, restored the tube-forming capability of ECs in the presence of wild-type GBP-1. The latter finding indicated that the inhibition of capillary formation is specifically due to the repression of MMP-1 expression by GBP-1, and is not affected by the anti-proliferative activity of the helical domain of GBP-1. These findings substantiate the role of GBP-1 as a major regulator of the anti-angiogenic response of ECs to ICs

    Nuclear factor-kappaB motif and interferon-alpha-stimulated response element co-operate in the activation of guanylate-binding protein-1 expression by inflammatory cytokines in endothelial cells.

    No full text
    The large GTPase GBP-1 (guanylate-binding protein-1) is a major IFN-gamma (interferon-gamma)-induced protein with potent anti-angiogenic activity in endothelial cells. An ISRE (IFN-alpha-stimulated response element) is necessary and sufficient for the induction of GBP-1 expression by IFN-gamma. Recently, we have shown that in vivo GBP-1 expression is strongly endothelial-cell-associated and is, in addition to IFN-gamma, also activated by interleukin-1beta and tumour necrosis factor-alpha, both in vitro and in vivo [Lubeseder-Martellato, Guenzi, Jörg, Töpolt, Naschberger, Kremmer, Zietz, Tschachler, Hutzler, Schwemmle et al. (2002) Am. J. Pathol. 161, 1749-1759; Guenzi, Töpolt, Cornali, Lubeseder-Martellato, Jörg, Matzen, Zietz, Kremmer, Nappi, Schwemmle et al. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 5568-5577]. In the present study, we identified a NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB)-binding motif that, together with ISRE, is required for the induction of GBP-1 expression by interleukin-1beta and tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Deactivation of the NF-kappaB motif reduced the additive effects of combinations of these cytokines with IFN-gamma by more than 50%. Importantly, NF-kappaB p50 rather than p65 activated the GBP-1 promoter. The NF-kappaB motif and ISRE were detected in an almost identical spatial organization, as in the GBP-1 promoter, in the promoter regions of various inflammation-associated genes. Therefore both motifs may constitute a cooperative inflammatory cytokine response module that regulates GBP-1 expression. Our findings may open new perspectives for the use of NF-kappaB inhibitors to support angiogenesis in inflammatory diseases including ischaemia

    A highly conserved repeated DNA element located in the chromosome of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

    No full text
    We report the discovery of a group of highly conserved DNA sequences located, in those cases studied, within intergenic regions of the chromosome of the Gram positive Streptococcus pneumoniae. The S. pneumoniae genome contains about 25 of these elements called BOX. From 5' to 3', BOX elements are composed of three subunits (boxA, boxB, and boxC) which are 59, 45 and 50 nucleotides long, respectively. BOX elements containing one, two and four copies of boxB have been observed; boxB alone was also detected in one instance. These elements are unrelated to the two most thoroughly documented families of repetitive DNA sequences present in the genomes of enterobacteria. BOX sequences have the potential to form stable stem-loop structures and one of these, at least, is transcribed. Most of these elements are located in the immediate vicinity of genes whose product has been implicated at some stage in the process of genetic transformation or in virulence of S. pneumoniae. This location raises the intriguing possibility that BOX sequences are regulatory elements shared by several coordinately controlled genes, including competence-specific and virulence-related genes

    Mapping of the Epitope of ATROSAB on human TNFR1.

    No full text
    <p>a) Comparison of amino acids 1–97 of human and mouse TNFR1 b). Positions of the identified residues involved in binding of ATROSAB (orange, green) and Htr-9 (blue) are highlighted. c) Location of the identified residues in the complex of LTα and TNFR1 (pdb entry 1TNF; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0072156#pone.0072156-Banner1" target="_blank">[44]</a>), colors as in b). d) Location of the identified residues in the TNFR1 dimer (pdb entry 1FT4; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0072156#pone.0072156-Carter1" target="_blank">[65]</a>), colors as in b). Structures were visualized using Pymol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1504 Schrödinger, LLC).</p
    corecore